Proposed Revisions for UCSD Policies and Procedures for Faculty AppointmentAdvancement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Proposed Revisions for UCSD Policies and Procedures for Faculty AppointmentAdvancement

Description:

UCD proposed: perform or facilitate scholarship (full-time clinicians) ... How to review clinical faculty with less than full-time clinical/teaching effort? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: heal48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Proposed Revisions for UCSD Policies and Procedures for Faculty AppointmentAdvancement


1
Proposed Revisions for UCSD Policies and
Procedures for Faculty Appointment/Advancement
  • SOM Academic Affairs Meeting
  • April 4, 2007

2
PPM 230-20 (Appointment) and PPM 230-28
(Advancement) of Academic Personnel
  • UCSD campus-wide effort to update policies to
    reduce inconsistencies and align policies with
    current practice
  • Draft PPM 230-20 with proposed changes released
    for review campus-wide and by Academic Senate
  • Proposed changes to PPM 230-28 still under
    discussion by campus Academic Personnel
  • Final approval by SVC Academic Affairs after
    review by Academic Senate

3
Key Proposed Changes
  • Salaried Clinical Faculty (PPM 230-20 28)
  • Scholarly/creative activity requirement
  • Assistant Professors (PPM 230-28)
  • One Appraisal (4 years)
  • Promotion assessment by 6th year
  • Approval required to postpone
  • Promotion whenever ready not acceleration

4
Scholarly/Creative ActivityBackground
  • UC Medical Schools have varying policies
    regarding scholarly/creative activity requirement
    in salaried clinical series
  • All (UCLA, UCSF, UCD)
  • None (UCI, UCSD)
  • UCD proposed perform or facilitate scholarship
    (full-time clinicians)

5
Scholarly/Creative Activity for Clinical
FacultyBackground/Rationale
  • SOM and SOMCAP concerns
  • Fairness of academic review with different
    departmental requirements (current practices not
    c/w policy)
  • Review criteria based solely on clinical/teaching
    do not reflect varied job descriptions
  • Is there a minimum required clinical effort to be
    eligible for this series (e.g., 50)?
  • How to review clinical faculty with less than
    full-time clinical/teaching effort?
  • Difficult to justify/evaluate acceleration

6
Scholarly/Creative Activity - 2006
  • Discussions SOMCAP, Exec Committee, Faculty
    Council
  • HSEC (chairs) unanimously supports some
    requirement
  • Concerns
  • Fairness of review if required only in some
    departments
  • Inappropriate burden for full-time clinicians
  • Will expectations change over time?
  • Miscommunication (research) will alienate
    clinical faculty
  • Blur distinction with Clinical X series
  • Positives
  • Increased stature/respect for clinical faculty
    (avoid 2 classes)
  • Most salaried clinical faculty already meet
    proposed criteria
  • Improve recruitment and retention of clinicians
    in University
  • Decided that official PPM revision needed
  • Specific criteria for reviewers to apply
    equitably
  • Clarify distinction between Clinical X and
    Salaried Clinical

7
Scholarly/Creative Activity - 2007
  • HS Faculty Council developed plan to disseminate,
    review, and discuss proposed policy
  • HSFC, BOG, SOMCAP, AOCS, Departments, General
  • Faculty meeting (2/15) and forums (2/20
    2/21)
  • Feedback to Academic Personnel
  • Review by Academic Senate
  • Final approval by SVC

8
Appointment of Academic PersonnelPPM 230-20
  • Proposed revisions released for comment 12/6/06
    (through 3/15/07)
  • http//academicaffairs.ucsd.edu/offices/apo/P
    PMUnderReview.htm
  • Supplements I (Clinical X) and II (Health
    Sciences Clinical) provide guidelines for these
    series
  • Updated policy attempts to clarify and
    distinguish requirements for salaried (Health
    Sciences) Clinical and Clinical X series

9
PPM 230-20 (Supplement I - Clinical X)
  • Demonstrated excellence in clinical and teaching
    within and outside UCSD
  • Key review criteria
  • Documented scholarship in area of expertise
  • Impact beyond UCSD
  • Usually appointed at Associate level and above
  • Well established scholarship and career path
  • Full-time only

10
PPM 230-20 (Suppl II - Salaried Clinical)
  • Primary role patient care and clinical teaching
  • Not escape or contingency series for faculty who
    dont succeed in other series
  • May be less than full-time
  • Same review categories but weighted differently
    (clinical, teaching, scholarly/creative, service)
  • Specific examples for scholarly/creative
    activity, broadly defined

11
Scholarly/Creative Activity(HS Clinical)
  • Some evidence of scholarly or creative activity
    appropriate to the clinical discipline, as
    determined by the individual department
  • Scholarly Activities e.g., participation in
    collaborative research, publications in medical
    literature (case reports, book chapters, reviews,
    letters to the editor,), published lay articles
    (e.g., newsletters, newspapers, magazines),
    presentations at scholarly meetings or continuing
    education courses
  • Creative Accomplishments e.g., innovative
    clinical procedures and teaching methods, new
    courses, clinical guidelines, instructional
    materials for teaching patients

12
Clinical X vs. (HS) Salaried Clinical
13
Scholarly/Creative Activity for Clinical
FacultySummary
  • General support for some requirement
  • Broad definition to recognize academic activities
    of most clinical faculty
  • Updated policy should be specific with examples
    to inform future reviewers
  • Clear distinction from Clinical X
  • Clinical faculty should be reviewed based on
    actual job descriptions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com