SURVIVING SEPSIS: SIX SIGMA APPROACH TO REDUCE MORTALITY AND COST - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

SURVIVING SEPSIS: SIX SIGMA APPROACH TO REDUCE MORTALITY AND COST

Description:

none – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:920
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: gcro9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SURVIVING SEPSIS: SIX SIGMA APPROACH TO REDUCE MORTALITY AND COST


1
SURVIVING SEPSIS SIX SIGMA APPROACH TO REDUCE
MORTALITY AND COST
  • WCBFS 8TH ANNUAL LEAN,SIX SIGMA, AND PROCESS
    IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTH CARE SUMMIT
  • Glenn Crotty Jr, MD, COO CAMC

2
Sepsis
  • Sepsis is a bloodstream infection that begins in
    one organ system and is transferred to other
    organ systems via the blood.
  • High Mortality over 50
  • One of the leading causes of death in US
    hospitals

3
Definitions
  • Sepsis Inflammatory Markers Site of Infection
  • Severe Sepsis Sepsis Organ Dysfunction (one
    or more)
  • Kidney impairment
  • Lung impairment
  • Confusion
  • Blood disorders
  • Septic Shock Severe Sepsis Unrelenting
  • Shock

4
Sepsis Symptoms
  • Often dependent on the presenting organ system
    involved
  • Can cause delirium, confusion, sweating, rapid or
    shallow respirations,high or low blood pressure,
    high or low pulse, high or low temperature
  • High WBC count, Left shift of differential, Low
    pH, low PO2, increased lactic acid level

5
Top Ten APR-DRG Mortalities
Of 813 deaths at CAMC in 2007, 15 were
attributed to Septicemia Disseminated Infection
(124 patients)
6
Define
  • 144 deaths at CAMC in 2005 twice the number of
    any other disease process
  • Patients who survived stayed an extra 6 days on
    average at cost of 900/day
  • Mortality for patients with sepsis both inpatient
    and ED to ICU is 56 consistent with national
    data
  • Decision to begin at one ED and one ICU

7
Define
Project Description
Improvement in the early identification and
aggressive care of the septic patient will
significantly decrease the mortality rate
associated with severe sepsis and septic shock.
National studies have identified best practice
around sepsis care and CAMC has an opportunity to
improve outcomes by applying this knowledge to
our processes of management of patients with
sepsis.
Project Scope Patients presenting to General
Hospital ED with positive screen for severe
sepsis, and admitted to the ICU (use ICD-9
discharge diagnosis codes of severe sepsis
(995.92) and septic shock (785.52)
Alignment Reduce expense per discharge, achieve
effective care by embedding clinical science into
care processes Strategic Goal Reduction of
Mortality
Target Reduce severe sepsis mortality rates by
25 at GH in 1 year
8
Measure Determine Potential Causes
Key Takeaway Process standardization and staff
education will yield the most opportunity for
improvement
9
Measure - Segmentation
10
Measure - Baseline
11
Measure - Baseline
12
Analyze
13
Improve
  • 2006 Severe Sepsis Order Set implemented at
    General Hospital, screening tool
    development/training, dedicated clinical
    pharmacists available for sepsis consults
  • 2007 ED nurse triage protocol developed, Philips
    Protocol Watch monitors placed in GH emergency
    department, rapid response teams (MET) engaged at
    both hospitals, Memorial Hospital sepsis team
    started, sepsis simulation training started for
    staff, residents, and medical staff
  • 2008 Sepsis Awareness week - Manny Rivers, MD
    visits and talks to many groups about EGDT,
    sepsis clinical coordinator hired to review all
    cases (concurrent vs. retrospective), focus on
    order set usage compliance at MH and roll out to
    Women and Childrens Hospital, algorithms
    developed for central line placement and use of
    PreSep catheter

14
FRONT- pg1
BACK- pg1
15
FRONT- pg2
BACK- pg2
16
FRONT- pg3
BACK- pg3
17
Awareness/Early Detection
18
Resuscitation Bundle Compliance (EGDT)
19
Maintenance Bundle Compliance/ Data
Analysis, Tracking, Reporting
20
Education
21
Pharmacy Sepsis Consult Data
P values lt 0.05 Statistically significant
22
Control GH Mortality Rates
23
Control Improved Recognition
24
System-wide Mortality Rates
25
Reliability
  • Unless there is a process capability of 80 there
    is generally not actual process.
  • First step is to achieve a process capability of
    80
  • Then improve process capability to 95 then to 99

26
Steps to 80 Reliabililty
  • Standardized order sets and protocols
  • Education and training
  • Increase process capability of use of order sets
    and protocols
  • Create shared vision and need

27
Steps to 95 Reliability
  • Alerts and Reminders New monitors with this
    capability
  • Root cause analysis of cases
  • Individual who reviews all cases
  • Sepsis ER alert to all care givers like Trauma
    and Cardiac alerts
  • Advanced simulation training for care givers and
    for outlining facilities who refer to CAMC
  • MET team to help respond to floor cases and who
    do active rounds
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com