Communications Systems Lecture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Communications Systems Lecture

Description:

May be a poor choice for fiber optics due to problems with splitting/merging ... Popular choice for fiber optics. Star Network. Ring Network. Example ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: DAnd81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Communications Systems Lecture


1
Communications SystemsLecture 7
  • David Andrews
  • dandrews_at_eecs.ukans.edu

2
What We Will Cover Today
  • Real Time Communication Requirements
  • Time
  • Fault Tolerance
  • Network Configurations
  • Single Node
  • Multiple Nodes
  • Protocols
  • Lower Level Data Transmission Formats

3
Real Time Communication Requirements
  • Must Support System Requirements
  • Hard/Soft Requirements
  • Computer Delay Times
  • Predictable versus Variable Delays
  • Transit Time Jitter
  • Reliability Issues
  • Guaranteed Delivery
  • Error Detection
  • Support Reconfiguration
  • Standardization
  • No One Standard Yet For R.T. Systems

4
Real Time Communications
  • Modern Systems Distributed
  • Attempting to Employ More Standards
  • Message Passing Protocols
  • Network Protocols
  • Network Topology Adopts Hierarchical Protocols
  • Allows Heterogeneous Operations
  • Application programs modified without need to
    modify low level protocols
  • Addition of Nodes Easier
  • Composable Protocols
  • Application Layer
  • Transport
  • Network Layer
  • Physical Layer

5
OSI Reference Model
  • OSI Open Systems Interconnection
  • Were going to deal mostly with Transport
    Network Data Link Layers

6
Example Distributed Pattern Using OSI Model
  • Each Layer forms virtual interconnections

7
Embedded Network Standards
  • The nice thing about standards is that you have
    so many to choose from. Furthermore, if you do
    not like any of them, you can just wait for next
    year's model.
  • - - - Tanenbaum '89

8
IEEE Standards
  • IEEE 802.1 - Interface definitions
  • A document that contains an introduction to
    the standards and interface definitions
  • IEEE 802.2 - Logic Link Control (LLC)
  • The upper part of the Data Link layer
  • Establishes/terminates links...
  • IEEE 802.3 - CSMA/CD - Carrier Sense Multiple
    Access/Collision Detection
  • IEEE 802.4 - Token Bus
  • IEEE 802.5 - Token Ring
  • IEEE 802.11 Wireless LAN
  • IEEE 802.15 Wireless Personal Area Network
    (WPAN)
  • IEEE 1394 - Firewire (consumer electronics)

9
Physical TopologiesLinear Networks
  • BUS
  • Good fit to long skinny systems
  • elevators, assembly lines, etc...
  • Flexible - many protocol options
  • Break in the cable splits the bus
  • May be a poor choice for fiber optics due to
    problems with splitting/merging
  • Was prevalent for early desktop systems
  • TREE
  • An extension of a bus
  • Better fault isolation
  • Be careful that root node is not a single
    point of failure

10
Other Network Topologies
  • Star
  • Can emulate bus functions
  • Easy to detect and isolate failures
  • Broken wire only affects one node
  • Good for fiber
  • Broken hub is catastrophic
  • Requires more wiring common for current
    desktop systems
  • No contention over a shared wire
  • Nodes act as repeaters
  • Requires bypass for failed node
  • Popular choice for fiber optics

11
Example Distributed Topology
12
Application/Transport Protocols
  • Application Layer Defines Message Passing
    Protocols
  • Supports Synchronous/Asynchronous Communications
  • Supports Error Detection
  • Separates Node from Network
  • Transmission error detection
  • Node error detection
  • Supports Composability
  • Encapsulates Node
  • Transport Layer (OS) Provides Implementation
    Additional Functionality
  • Common Characteristics (Well look in more detail
    later)
  • Application Protocols
  • Asynchronous/Synchronous Send/Receive
  • End to End Acknowledgements
  • Transport Protocols
  • Flow Control
  • OS Timeout and Retries

13
Example Message Passing Pattern
  • SEND( Channel_ID in CHANNEL_PTR_TYPE
  • MSG_SIZE in MSG_SIZE_TYPE
  • Buffer_Ptr in BUFFER_PTR_TYPE) return
    TX_PTR_TYPE

14
Message Transfer Protocol
  • User message to Communication Buffer
  • Message Executive Header (to OS at receiving
    node)
  • Request to send (OS -gt send network)
  • Message Transfer (segmented)
  • Transfer Complete (send network -gt receive
    network)
  • Transfer Complete (receive network -gt receive OS)
  • Header uploaded (receive network -gt receive OS)
  • Message uploaded (receive network -gt app)
  • Status return (receive OS -gt receive network)
  • Status return (receive -gt send network)
  • State return (send network -gt send OS)

15
Header Information
  • Increasing functionality requires more
    complicated structures/processing

 
CCM Executive Header Layout
CCM Communications control message (OS lt-gt
Network) information CCM keeps transport
information based on OS protocols
Executive Header (OS lt-gt OS) keeps information
between OSs
16
Error Detection
  • Application Layer
  • Message Context (Validity of Data)
  • OS Layer
  • Can Check for the following Problems
  • Data corrupted during transfer
  • Checksum errors, CRC checks
  • Reciever Must Reproduce Checksums, CRCs
  • Message Not delivered
  • Receiver Node/OS Down
  • Network Clogged
  • Time Out (Watchdog Timer) set on each
    transmission goes off before ack
  • OS Can Attempt Resolution by Resending Message
  • Single Segments Within Bigger Message
  • OS Can Status OS on Receiver Node
  • May be Network instead of OS
  • Network Layer
  • Check for transmission of bit streams between
    nodes complete
  • Parity check, Network Connectivity

17
Network Protocols
  • OS Bridges between application program and
    network
  • Network has own Data/Invocation protocols
  • Examples of Data Protocols
  • CSMA/CD Carrier Sense Multiple Access/Collision
    Detection
  • Ethernet
  • CSMA/CA Carrier Sense Multiple Access/Collision
    Avoidance
  • CAN (control area network) We will study more
    next class
  • Examples of Invocation Protocols
  • BPP Buffered Pipe Protocol
  • Mailbox

18
Generic Protocol Message(Transport and Network)
  • Transport/Network Both Have Protocols
  • Usually mutually supportive
  • Header
  • Routing information (source, destination)
  • Transport Logical ID for programs
  • Network Node ID
  • Global priority information (which message
    gets on bus first?)
  • Data
  • Application- or high-level-standard defined
    data field ( 1 Meg message)
  • Transport Segments (typically 1k bytes)
  • Network Packets (typically lt 100 bytes)
  • Error detection
  • Detects corrupted data (e.g., using a CRC)
  • Embedded networks can have very high bit error
    rates

19
Distributed Node Hardware Support
  • Hardware Support For Message Passing
  • Decouple Network From Transport/Application
    Program
  • Typical DMA Channels, Built in Error Checking
    (CRC)
  • Example Shows Event Driven Interface

20
Physical Layer
  • Transmission Issues of Physical Channel
  • Channel Characteristics
  • Logic Levels of voltage
  • Transmission speeds
  • Width of logic 1/0
  • Bit Encodings
  • Non-recurring-zero (NRZ)
  • No timing info contained within message
  • Timing is initiated with start bit, but thats it
    !
  • Synchronous
  • Introduces intentional line changes within
    message bits to synch on

21
Basic Bit Encoding - NRZ
  • Asynchronous
  • No Synchronization within data stream
  • Timing at start of transmission
  • Separate send/receive clocks must be close in
    frequency
  • Number bits in message limited by drift (approx.
    10)

22
Synchronous EncodingManchester Code
  • Manchester Encoding
  • Data encoded by transition from high-to-low or
    low-to-high
  • Self-clocking scheme

0
0
1
1
23
General Considerations
  • Flexibility Generally Traded Off With Temporal
    Accuracy
  • Additional support (retries/flow control) require
    more processing
  • Jitter introduced with variable functionality
  • Hierarchical Protocols Introduce Composability
  • Good Expansion, Better Abstractions
  • More Complexity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com