Waste - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Waste

Description:

... in packaging produced. ... rigid plastics, glass fines, non-recyclable' papers ... plastic bags, public place. Summary. More rigorous compliance ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: edc92
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Waste


1
Waste Recycle 2005 A Strengthened National
Packaging Covenant 25 August 2005,
Fremantle Edward Cordner CEO, National Packaging
Covenant
2
Outcomes
  • Consistent NATIONAL approach.
  • Entire packaging supply chain is involved
    notably retailers.
  • gt 640 signatories
  • gt 90 of the packaging produced in Australia
  • gt 80 of retail brands
  • 40 of Local Government councils
  • Approx. 19 mill. joint funding spent.
  • Comprehensive evaluations and ongoing
    consultation.

3
Future Model
  • Include targets measurable outcomes.
  • Action plans reports to contain detailed
    actions, quantifiable performance measures,
    targets and timelines.
  • More rigorous compliance enforcement.
  • Greater Local Government engagement.
  • Better utilise the NEPM process.
  • Be adequately resourced and funded.

4
Whats Different ?
  • Explicit Performance Goals.
  • Overarching Covenant Targets.
  • Key Performance Indicators.
  • Broader Scope beyond kerbside.
  • Revised Environmental Code of Practice.
  • Expanded Covenant Council membership.
  • Mid-term Review.

5
Targets Data (03)
  • Consumption 3.47 million tonnes.
  • Recovery 1.65 million tonnes. 48
  • Paper Cardboard 64 60
  • Glass 35 60
  • Steel Cans 44 50
  • Aluminium Bev. 63 50
  • Plastics 21 22.5

6
Targets 2010
  • 1. Increased recycling rate for packaging of 65
  • Paper Cardboard 70 80
  • Glass 50 60
  • Steel Cans 60 65
  • Aluminium Bev. 70 75
  • Plastics 30 35
  • 2. Landfill no increase above current baseline.
  • 3. Increased recycling of non-recyclable
    packaging
  • 25 (current est. 10)

7
KPIs
  • Total weight of packaging sold by material type.
  • Ratio of weight of packaging to products
    packaged.
  • Proportion of packaging used, classified as
    non-recyclable.
  • recycled content in packaging produced.
  • Amount of packaging material generated on-site,
    sent to recycling landfill respectively.

8
KPIs
  • Implementation of Buy Recycled practices.
  • Total weight of packaging recovered recycled.
  • Packaging as of total waste.
  • of premises covered by collection systems.
  • Amount type of packaging in the litter stream.
  • Recovery rates and Contamination rates of
    resource recovery systems.

9
Broader Scope
  • Looking beyond kerbside key focus.
  • Development of Away from Home recovery systems
  • public places, workplaces and commercial
    industrial premises
  • throughout the packaging supply chain -
    distribution packaging
  • litter reduction
  • Data Collection Reporting
  • Increased focus on information education.

10
Action Plans
  • New Action Plan to be submitted by 30 Nov 2005.
  • 3 Year plans recommended.
  • Establish baseline data against relevant KPIs.
  • Set individual targets timelines for Year 1.
  • Include in-house distribution packaging.
  • Address issues of litter, market devt and
    awareness.

11
Annual Reports
  • Standardised on a reporting period July June.
  • Report for period ending 30 June 2005 to be
    submitted by 30 Sept 2005.
  • Thereafter annual reports to be submitted by 31
    Oct.
  • Will need to show real performance against KPIs
    and commitments.
  • Report and explain significant changes to
    packaging.
  • Set individual targets timelines for following
    year.

12
Code of Practice
  • Comprehensive transparent guide for making
    packaging choices.
  • Contains specific overall strategies including
  • Source Reduction
  • Recovery Recycling
  • Able to incorporate Recycled Content
  • Likelihood to become Litter
  • Signatories must demonstrate how the Code is
    being used and report progress.

13
NEPM
  • Focuses on
  • non-signatory Brand-Owners.
  • non-complying Signatories.
  • Brand owner definition broadened.
  • Exemption threshold under revision.
  • Mandatory take-back of packaging EPR
    principles.
  • Intended to be onerous.

14
Future Project Areas
  • Away From Home
  • workplaces, institutions, pubs / clubs
  • Enhanced Domestic Systems
  • increase yields within existing parameters
  • Enhanced Sorting Facilities
  • glass, plastics, metals
  • Market Development
  • rigid plastics, glass fines, non-recyclable
    papers

15
Future Project Areas
  • Education Awareness kerbside
  • minimise contamination, cans, community message
  • C I Recycling
  • paper / cardboard, beverage containers
  • Data Collection
  • consumption, recovery
  • Litter
  • plastic bags, public place

16
Summary
  • More rigorous compliance assessment
    enforcement.
  • Local Govt. involvement is integral to
    successful outcomes.
  • Away from Home offers major gains for
    recycling.
  • All signatories expected to re-sign by 30
    September.
  • Develop / Improve data collection reporting
    systems.
  • Targets apply to all Covenant stakeholders
    collectively.
  • Mid-Term review of progress against targets.

17
Waste Recycle 2005 A Strengthened National
Packaging Covenant 25 August 2005,
Fremantle Edward Cordner CEO, National Packaging
Covenant
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com