Run for the Hills How to successfully create an Evacuation Tool for all Jurisdictions By Shad Burcha - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Run for the Hills How to successfully create an Evacuation Tool for all Jurisdictions By Shad Burcha

Description:

... URS 206-438-2133 James_Gregory_at_urscorp.com. Jordan Karp, URS 857-383-3835 ... King County OEM developed RFP, and using Evacuation Planning Committee, hired ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: shadbu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Run for the Hills How to successfully create an Evacuation Tool for all Jurisdictions By Shad Burcha


1
Run for the Hills!How to successfully
create an Evacuation Tool for all
JurisdictionsBy Shad Burcham and Jim Gregory
2
Evacuation Template Project History and Lessons
learnedSeptember 16, 2009
  • King County OEM
  • URS Corporation

3
(No Transcript)
4
Contacts
  • Shad Burcham, KC OEM 206-205-4072
    Shad.Burcham_at_kingcounty.gov
  • Jim Gregory, URS 206-438-2133 James_Gregory_at_ursco
    rp.com
  • Jordan Karp, URS 857-383-3835
  • Jordan_Karp_at_urscorp.com
  • URS Evacuation Planning Website
    http//www.urscorpseattle.com/forum1/

5
Evacuation
  • Organized, phased and supervised withdrawal of
    civilians from dangerous areas, and their
    reception and care in safe areas.

6
Genesis of Evacuation Project
  • Failures of Support to Impacted Areas of
    Hurricane Katrina - 2005
  • Federal Plans Review Team - April, 2006
  • Jurisdictions need to plan for Katrina-like
    Event
  • Pacific Northwest Common Sense
  • Scalable Template first before plans

7
Overview
  • UASI 2006 allocated 175,000 to hire consultant
    to develop evacuation template (Workbook).
  • King County OEM developed RFP, and using
    Evacuation Planning Committee, hired URS
    Corporation as consultant.
  • Evacuation Planning Committee will support
    consultant with the development of the template

8
UASI Evacuation Planning Group
  • Representatives from
  • Emergency Management - Pierce, King, Snohomish,
    Seattle, Bellevue, State, Burien
  • Transportation King, Seattle, State, and Pierce
  • LE King, WSP. Fire Pierce, Seattle
  • NGOs King, Pierce ARCs
  • PW King, Pierce, and Snohomish

9
Evacuation Concepts
  • Large scale mass evacuation not a high
    probability event
  • Always multiple jurisdictional
  • Movement is from area of no service to area of
    service

10
(No Transcript)
11
Planning Assumptions
  • Evacuation is a multiple jurisdiction activity
  • ICS will be used to manage evacuation
    activities/phases at all levels
  • Disasters or emergencies occur with little or no
    warning
  • Evacuees may be only temporarily displaced unless
    the event causes destruction or contamination of
    homes, businesses

12
Planning Assumptions Cont.
  • Evacuations are likely to be spontaneous without
    government control
  • With rare exception the State has no authority to
    mandate evacuations and enforce them
  • Some citizens will not evacuate regardless of the
    hazard(s)
  • Planning must include special needs, pets,
    livestock

13
Six Evacuation Phases
  • Incident Analysis and Decision to Evacuate by
    local ICS.
  • Warning
  • Preparation to Move
  • Movement En-Route Support
  • Reception Support
  • Return

14
Incident Analysis Phase
  • Local ICS initiates the evacuation process
  • Any time a local ICS plans an evacuation outside
    of its jurisdiction, it is multi-jurisdictional
  • What form of ICS do we use?
  • Unified Command
  • Area Command
  • Use of Incident Management Team (IMT)?

15
Incident Analysis Phase Cont.
  • State EOC as Area Command?
  • IMT Overhead Team to manage evacuation for local
    ICS?
  • Governor Appoints IMT and provides Delegation of
    Authority?

16
Proposed Scalable Evacuation Incident Management
Team (IMT) Table
17
Impacts on Local Infrastructure
  • Road systems
  • Water and Sewer systems
  • Food service distribution
  • Fire, LE, EMS resources
  • Power
  • Local Human Service organizations
  • Schools, facilities used as shelters, media

18
(No Transcript)
19
WARNING PHASE
  • To provide timely and accurate information and
    instructions to citizens at risk from natural
    and/or technological emergencies and disasters.

20
WARNING PHASE CONT.
  • Types Pre-Event and Post-Event
  • Priority Move people out of harms way
  • Warning Systems in UASI and Washington State
  • NAWAS (National Warning System).
  • CEMNET
  • NOAA
  • MyState USA, Code Red

21
WARNING PHASE CONT.
  • 800 MHz Radio
  • Lahar Warning System (Mt. Rainier)
  • Amateur Radio
  • NWWARN
  • Satellite Phones
  • Maximize Use of Media through JICs, PIOs, RPIN
  • Teaching Point Effective Warning PIO Media
    Standardized Messaging

22
(No Transcript)
23
Preparation To Move Phase
  • In most evacuations, the local ICS will need to
    change to Unified ICS in order to successfully
    coordinate multiple jurisdictions
  • Local ICS determines the need for evacuation,
    changes to unified command and notifies
    applicable organizations to begin preparation
  • Use of Assembly Areas, or Rally Points

24
Preparation To Move Phase Cont.
  • ICS (or dedicated IMT) coordinates safe area,
    route from danger area to safe area, access to
    route, support services along route and at
    reception area
  • Is the use of an Incident Management Team (IMT)
    feasible?
  • Proclamations of Disasters from local
    jurisdictions to State
  • Coordination ID of safe area predicated on
    population to be moved

25
Preparation to Move Phase Cont.
  • Public Information requirements as big as Warning
    Phase (multi-media, constant repetition, multiple
    sources, standardized messages)
  • Clearly defined route(s), all public officials
    sending same message
  • Huge Business Community Role
  • Evacuees will need to pack critical meds, food
    for pets, disaster supplies, etc.

26
(No Transcript)
27
MOVEMENT EN-ROUTE SUPPORT PHASE
  • Operational activities that move population from
    danger area to safe area
  • En-Route support includes, fuel, rest stops, food
    service, maintenance, ATM services, phone
    services, information signage, EMS, LE, Fire
    service, DOT, JIC activities
  • Pre-designated, Prioritized Routes?

28
(No Transcript)
29
RECEPTION SUPPORT PHASE
  • Largest body of work
  • Reception Area receives evacuees at reception
    point, performs triage for general and special
    needs population, provides support services
    (short term shelter, sanitation, security, food
    service, public information education,
    translation services, medical services, shelter
    for pets, service animals, livestock).

30
Reception Support Cont.
  • Special Needs Shelters
  • Schools, Prisons, Medically Fragile Population
    (example kidney dialysis patients, etc.)
  • Frail Elderly Alzheimer patients
  • Language Translation Services
  • Medical Staff Support from Nursing/Assisted
    Living Facilities
  • Prescription Drug Services Requirements
  • Current logistics is from ARC, jurisdictions for
    general population shelters.

31
Reception Support Cont.
  • Emergency Managers think Groups
  • Must combine emergency services with
    Comprehensive Individual Client Services by
    Social Service Agencies.
  • Logistics, Logistics, Logistics!
  • Teaching Point Cost capturing will be critical
    for the Return Phase!

32
(No Transcript)
33
RETURN PHASE
  • Planning and Security are Critical
  • Unified Planning Approach
  • Safety Considerations Paramount
  • Reverse Process

34
Workbook Vision
  • Enable jurisdiction to prepare its own evacuation
    plan
  • Create a planning tool
  • Provide education and guidance
  • Promote degree of consistency among plans in UASI
    region

35
Elements of Workbook
  • Educational Text
  • Planning Checklists
  • Plan Template

Template
Text
Checklists
36
Workbook Content
  • How to Use
  • Purpose
  • Evacuation Types
  • Evacuation Phases
  • Jurisdiction Roles
  • Plan Scope
  • Critical Assumptions
  • Concept of Operations
  • Command and Control
  • Situational Awareness
  • Communications
  • Traffic Management Tactics
  • Destinations
  • Re-Entry
  • Administration
  • Plan Review and Maintenance
  • Exercises
  • Authorities
  • Planning Checklists
  • Plan Template
  • Additional Resources

37
Template Content
  • Introduction
  • Authorities
  • Critical Assumptions
  • Hazards
  • Concept of Operations
  • Evacuation Operations
  • Administration and Logistics
  • Plan Review and Maintenance
  • Training and Exercises
  • Appendices

38
Planning Checklists
  • Steps necessary to prepare plan
  • Items to prepare / data to collect
  • Matched to Template sections
  • Cross-referenced to Workbook text sections

39
Planning Checklist Sample
40
Planning Challenges
  • Most events will be multi-jurisdictional
  • Need for interagency coordination
  • Communications - interoperability
  • Extensive resource management/logistics

41
Lessons Learned
  • Decide whether Evacuation Plan will be
    stand-alone document or annex to other plan
    (CEMP)
  • Bring all relevant departments to planning
    process early
  • Leverage previous planning efforts (e.g.,
    communications processes, common organization
    data etc)
  • Much of necessary data is likely already
    available Planning Dept., Traffic Dept.

42
Lessons Learned Continued
  • Be Flexible! Each jurisdiction has different
    priorities.
  • Take advantage of learning opportunities
    example San Diego County Fires
  • Critical to have one organization for corporate
    memory example URS

43
Epilogue
44
Be Careful What You Ask For!
  • Final Evacuation Template distributed Q2 2008
  • Phase II Develop TTXs in each UASI county to
    test evacuation plans developed by individual
    jurisdiction using the Template
  • January, 2009 Corps of Engineers Seattle
    District announces Howard Hanson Dam is leaking
  • Green River 60 miles long headwaters in east
    KC, flows east to west goes north through cities
    of Auburn, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, Seattle to
    Puget Sound.

45
(No Transcript)
46
Leaking Dam Situation Cont.
  • Economic Engine for Washington State is King,
    Pierce, and Snohomish Counties
  • Economic value of Lower Green River Valley 12
    Billion Dollars
  • Boeing, NW Harvest, multiple food production
    facilities, chemical plants, fuel natural gas
    pipelines, water, sewer, power, rail
    infrastructure.

47
Green River Evacuation Planning
  • 26,000 residents to move out of flood area
  • 4,000 planning figure for Reception Support
  • Coordination and synchronization of warning
    messages, evacuation information, PIO/Media
    messages is critical.

48
Green River Evacuation Planning Cont.
  • Mega-Shelters for General Population
  • Livestock Shelter
  • Pet Shelters
  • Feeding Shelter

49
(No Transcript)
50
Recovery Planning
  • Transitional Housing
  • Long Term Housing
  • Decontamination of facilities
  • PA for Jurisdictions
  • IA for Individuals and Business

51
QUESTIONS ??
52
(No Transcript)
53
QUESTIONS ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com