An Introduction to Finite Element Analysis with ProMECHANICA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

An Introduction to Finite Element Analysis with ProMECHANICA

Description:

An Introduction to Finite Element Analysis with ProMECHANICA – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2736
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: paula62
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An Introduction to Finite Element Analysis with ProMECHANICA


1
An Introduction to Finite Element Analysis with
Pro/MECHANICA
  • Stephen Seymour, P.E.Seymour Engineering
    Consulting Group, LLC
  • www.seymourecg.com

2
Presentation Outline
  • Introduction to Pro/Mechanica
  • Capabilities and differences
  • Cantilever beam demo
  • Materials, loads, and constraints
  • Element types and meshing
  • Idealizations, connections, and contact
  • Analysis definition and convergence
  • Reviewing results

3
What is Pro/Mechanica?
  • Pro/Mechanica is general finite element analysis
    (FEA) software tool that is directly integrated
    into Pro/Engineer
  • Pro/Mechanica (also referred to as Simulation) is
    generally classified as a structural and thermal
    Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) tool.

4
Pro/Mechanica Capabilities
  • Static structural stress/strain/disp
  • Modal, prestressed modal, and mechanical
    vibration
  • Buckling
  • Non-linear contact / large deformation
  • Fatigue
  • Hyperelastic materials
  • Steady state thermal analysis
  • Transient thermal analysis

5
How Does Pro/Mechanica Differ?
  • Pro/Mechanica is a linear P-element finite
    element solver
  • Most other commercial FEA packages are H-element
    codes
  • The difference convergence method
  • P varies element shape functions
  • H mesh refinement

6
How Does Pro/Mechanica Differ?
  • Pro/Mechanica by default is a linear finite
    element solver with some non-linear capabilities
  • Automated convergence via element shape function
    adaptation
  • Multi-pass adaptive (MPA)
  • Single pass adaptive (SPA)

7
Analysis Methodology
8
Cantilever Beam Demonstration
  • Goal determine the maximum bending stresses

9
Solution Comparison
Analytical Solution
  • Analytical model based on classic beam theory for
    slender uniform cross section beams

10
Solution Comparison
Pro/Mechanica FEA Solution
  • Pro/Mechanica FEA results indicate maximum
    bending stress is approximately 6000 psi
  • Stress varies linearly along length of beam as
    expected

11
Applying Material Properties
Parts
  • Pro/Mechanica provides a default library of
    materials
  • Ability to create custom materials with
    descriptions
  • Be careful of units!

12
Applying Material Properties
Assemblies
  • Ability to assign different materials to
    different components
  • Material assignment can be performed at either
    assembly or individual part level
  • Material properties must be assigned before
    meshing

13
Degrees of Freedom (DOF)
  • The primary 6 independent motions of any solid
    body. 3 translation and 3 rotation
  • All static structural FEA problems required no
    rigid motion, therefore after constraints (and
    idealizations) there must be no motion

14
Displacement Constraints
  • Constraints can be defined on surfaces, edges, or
    points
  • Constraints can be free, fixed, or prescribed
    relative to the coordinate system selection
  • Constraint coordinate systems can be Cartesian,
    cylindrical, or spherical.

15
Symmetry Constraints
  • The symmetry constraint will simulate a symmetry
    type boundary condition by constraining motion
    normal (perpendicular) to the selected surface
  • Should not be used with asymmetrical loading
    conditions
  • Should not be used with modal analyses

16
Loads
Forces and Moments
  • Most common of all load types
  • Can be applied on surfaces, edges, and points
  • Can reference user defined coordinate systems
  • Moments must be specified with the advanced
    option Total Load at Point

17
Loads
Other
  • Bearing loads
  • Centrifugal loads
  • Gravity loads
  • Pressure loads
  • Temperature loads
  • Thermal simulation result loads
  • Remember gravity in the IPS unit system is 386.4
    in/sec2

18
Element Types
Solid Elements
  • Tetrahedral shape
  • 3 translational DOFs at nodes
  • Rotational constraints not required
  • Shown in blue
  • Ideal for solid bodies with large cross-sectional
    areas
  • Not well suited for thin bodies

19
Element Types
Shell Elements
  • 2D or 3D triangles and quadrilaterals
  • 6 translational DOFs at nodes
  • Shown in green
  • Ideally suited for parts with thin cross-sections
    (i.e. tank walls, sheet metal components, etc.)
  • Non-linear contact not possible for this element
    type

20
Element Types
Beam Elements
  • 2D or 3D point-to-point or thru curve
  • 6 translational DOFs at nodes
  • Shown in light blue with cross-section (Shown
    here in red for clarity)
  • Well suited to represent beams with a 101
    slenderness ratio

21
Mesh
  • Meshing can be done either before or during
    analysis
  • The greater the of elementsthe longer the
    solution time
  • Mixed element meshes are possible
  • Convergence problems can typically be resolved
    by refinement in high gradient locations

22
Mesh Controls
  • Control the density of elements within specific
    regions of the model
  • Can be applied on volumes, surfaces, and edges
  • Ability to specify regions of exclusion where
    singularities may exist

23
Idealizations
Masses
  • Mass idealizations (also known as mass elements)
    are attached to a single point (either datum or
    vertex) within your model
  • Mass idealizations by default are mass only with
    no inertia. However, an advanced mass element
    may also included mass moments of inertia (MMOI)
    to increase the accuracy of the solution
  • Be careful of mass unit!

24
Idealizations
Springs
  • Spring idealizations can simulate the behavior of
    real world springs in the model without having to
    solid model a spring
  • Spring idealizations can range from very simple
    extension only springs that are defined
    point-to-point.to complex springs that can have
    varying linear and torsional spring constants in
    all 6 degrees of freedom

25
Connections
  • There are four main connection types
  • Interface
  • Weld
  • Rigid link
  • Weighted link

26
Connections
Interface
  • Bonded
  • Merges coincident faces together for
    the analysis
  • Free interface
  • Allows coincident faces to act independently of
    one another
  • Contact
  • Interpenetration not allowed. Can be
    frictionless or infinite friction

27
Connections
Welds
  • Three main types of welds
  • End weld
  • Perimeter weld
  • Spot weld
  • End and perimeter welding extend the base shell
    geometry
  • Spot welds are created using beams. May specify
    alternate material.

28
Connections
Rigid Link
  • Can be created to points, edges, curves, and
    surfaces
  • Couples the DOF
  • Features with rigid links cannot have localized
    displacements or rotations
  • Improper use of rigid links can adversely affect
    results

29
Connections
Weighted Link
  • Developed primarily for distributing mass or
    loads
  • Allow the attachment of mass idealizations
    without stiffening structure
  • Source point must be a datum
    point, target entities can be
    points, edges, or surfaces

30
Analysis Definition
  • Once loads, constraints, and materials have been
    defined it is time to define the type of analysis
    to be performed
  • Choose from the drop down list the analysis type
    or study you wish to perform
  • Some analysis types may require additional
    licensing

31
Analysis Definition
  • Analysis name entered will be subfolder name
    where files reside
  • Multiple load sets can be analyzed independently
    or summed.
  • Select the convergence method
  • Choose output options
  • Enable/Disable the exclusions of elements from
    the analysis

32
Convergence Options
  • Multi-Pass Adaptive (MPA)
  • Polynomial order is repeatedly increased until
    specified convergence is obtained (default 10)
  • Single Pass Adaptive (SPA)
  • First pass using order of 3. Second pass order
    is increased to a max of 9 in high stress
    gradient areas.
  • Quick check
  • Mechanica performs a single pass at a uniform
    polynomial order of 3.

33
Convergence Options
Multi-Pass Adaptive (MPA)
  • Percentage represents max allowable change from
    pass to pass
  • A poorly converged model is equal to pretty
    picture
  • Converged model doesnt imply accurate solution
  • GIGO principle
  • Poor boundary conditions

34
Reviewing Results
Launch The Results Viewer
  • There are three options for viewing the completed
    results
  • Select the analysis and choose the results icon
  • Start the results viewer from Pro/Mechanica or
    Pro/Engineer

35
Reviewing Results
Results Selection
  • Select from the drop down the result you wish to
    plot
  • Fringe is the default display type, but vector
    and graph plots are possible
  • P-level is a plot of the highest polynomial order
    used for each element throughout the domain

36
Reviewing Results
Results Display Location
  • Gives the option to plot results on specific
    geometric entities
  • For assemblies results may be plotted on certain
    components only or in exploded view

37
Reviewing Results
Results Display Options
  • Control color display and animation effects
  • Continuous tone creates smooth result plots, but
    requires more computing time and memory
  • To see the true deformation set the scaling to a
    value of 1 and uncheck the box

38
Results
  • Dynamical query results
  • Animate deformed shape
  • Create section planes
  • Customizable legend

39
Conclusion
  • This completes the introduction to Finite Element
    Analysis (FEA) with Pro/Mechanica
  • Many more features available
  • Remember always make sure your results make
    sense
  • GIGO principle

40
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com