Chemical and Biological Weapons - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Chemical and Biological Weapons

Description:

Chemical and Biological Weapons. Kaleo Cuaresma. Mariana Galindo. Robyn Kobashigawa ... Biological weapons: intentional use of diseases to affect an adversaries ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2497
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: robynkob
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chemical and Biological Weapons


1
Chemical and Biological Weapons
  • Kaleo Cuaresma
  • Mariana Galindo
  • Robyn Kobashigawa

2
Relevant Facts
  • Biological weapons intentional use of diseases
    to affect an adversaries military force,
    population, crops, or livestock
  • Countries/Organizations known to have Biological
    Weapons
  • Iraq
  • Soviet Union
  • Al-Queda
  • Japans Aum Shin Rikyo

3
Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention
  • Banned development, production, stockpiling,
    acquisition, or retention of microbial or
    biological agents or toxins
  • Bans weapons, equipment or means of delivery
  • As of November 2001, 162 States signed BTWC, 144
    States have ratified
  • Use of BW prohibited by Geneva Protocol-1925

4
Anthrax
  • Three types of anthrax infections
  • cutaneous
  • gastrointestinal
  • inhalation
  • Anthrax
  • Can easily become airborne
  • can travel downwind for hundreds of miles
  • remains dangerous for decades

5
Professional Issues
  • Political officials must balance safety,
    economics, and politics
  • Is it right for private companies to manufacture
    anthrax?
  • Safety for employees in high risk jobs

6
Legal/Policy Issues
  • Breaking treaty that banned countries from mass
    producing chemical/biological weapons
  • Illegal to manufacture, distribute, or utilize
    anthrax in the US
  • The UN has the right to inspect biological
    laboratories of countries whom agreed to the
    treaty
  • If other countries, who are not part of the UN
    and who didnt sign the treaty, produce BW, who
    will enforce the ban? How?
  • How are our relations affected by other countries
    who produce anthrax?
  • Should authorities keep anthrax scares public?

7
Ethical Issues
  • Should we risk so many lives by using BW
  • How many civilian lives will be affected?
  • Would it be better to use biological or nuclear
    weapons in terms of environmental and human
    impact?
  • How would we decide which is better?
  • Does the US Defense Department have a duty to
    keep up manufacturing BW with other nations?
  • Who benefits from the use of BW and how?

8
Stakeholders
  • Civilians
  • i.e. Farmers
  • Humankind
  • Military
  • UN
  • Government
  • Biological Laboratories
  • Doctors

9
Possible Actions
  • Nuclear Weapons
  • Biological Weapons
  • Old Fashioned Warfare

10
Nuclear Weapons
  • Consequences
  • Efforts will be concentrated on nuclear weapons
    and not biological
  • More military spending
  • Biological Weapons- 10 million
  • Nuclear Weapons- 200 million
  • More toxic pollution/damage to environment
  • Faster outcome

11
Nuclear Weapons
  • Individual Rights/Fairness
  • Everyone has the right to live normally
  • Everyone has the right to be protected by their
    government
  • Governments have the right to defend themselves
    from attacks
  • Common Good
  • Increase Research

12
Biological Weapons
  • Consequences
  • Costs less to manufacture
  • Easier to produce
  • Almost as effective
  • Prolonged Effects

13
Biological Weapons
  • Individual Rights/Fairness
  • Everyone has the right to live normally
  • Everyone has the right to be protected by their
    government
  • Governments have the right to defend themselves
    from attacks
  • Common Good
  • Increase Research

14
Old-Fashioned Warfare
  • Consequences
  • Less harm to the environment
  • Less civilian casualties/military attacked
  • War lasts longer
  • More mental damage

15
Old-Fashioned Warfare
  • Individual Rights/Fairness
  • No countries would have an advantage because of
    technology
  • Everyone has the right to live normally
  • Everyone has the right to be protected by their
    government
  • Governments have the right to defend themselves
    from attacks
  • Common Good
  • May deter wars
  • Less long term harm to environment

16
Final Decision
  • World Peace
  • Did you expect us to choose how to murder people?
    Wed rather have the Bad People assassinated
    with snipers.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com