Title: Lessons from German Labor Market Policy Klaus F' Zimmermann IZA, DIW Berlin and Bonn University Sept
1Lessons from German Labor Market PolicyKlaus
F. ZimmermannIZA, DIW Berlin and Bonn University
September 25, 2009Chinese University of Hong
Kong
2Outline
- The German Labor Market An Overview
- Structural Deficits before 2003
- Major Labor Market Reforms (2003-2005, Hartz
Reforms) - ALMP The German Experience
- Conclusions The Design of Labor Market Policy
3The German Labor Market An Overview
- High unemployment as a central problem in
post-unification Germany - This has often been linked to
- The high level of employment protection
- The high labor costs
- The strictly regulated labor market
- Protection of employment risks characterized by
- High level of statutory employment protection for
regular contracts - Predominance of compulsory social insurance
providing earnings-related benefits in case of
unemployment after a sufficient contribution
period - Until 2005 also earnings-related long-term
unemployment assistance - Replaced by a means-tested flat rate benefit in
2005 Major break with Germanys long tradition
of status maintenance in case of unemployment - Part of a broader policy shift towards activation
(Hartz reforms)
4Unemployment in Germany (1960-2009)
Dotcom bubble
Hartz reforms
German reunification
Oil crises
Post-war economic boom
Source Federal Employment Agency
- In October 2008 the unemployment dropped under
the level of 3 million for the first time since
1992 - This might be an indication that the fundamental
structural problems of the German labor market
could have been decisively loosen by the Hartz
reforms
5Policy Responses to the German Reunification
- After the German reunification, the integration
of the East German economy led to an increase in
unemployment - The political decision to finance a large share
of the transition costs through social insurance
contributions (and not by general taxation)
increased the burden on labor costs - Policymakers reacted in a selective way
- Higher non-wage labor costs put pressure on
standard forms of employment and dampened new
employment opportunities - Growth of flexible jobs, i.e., non-standard forms
of employment, facilitated by several legislative
steps that required less employment regulation,
involved lower or no non-wage labor costs, or
offered even subsidies for such employment forms - Additionally, active labor market policy (ALMP)
measures were extensively used in East Germany - In particular, public training programs and job
creation schemes
6Post-Unification Germany Development of
Standard vs. Non-Standard Forms of Employment
Source Federal Employment Agency
- Non-standard forms of employment gained
importance in recent years - Increase particularly strong in 2003 and 2004
7Post-Unification Germany Extensive Use of Job
Creation Schemes and Public Training Programs
... but both traditional ALMP measures in
Germany lost importance in recent years
Source Federal Employment Agency.
8Labor Market Institutions Historical Perspective
- Compulsory unemployment insurance introduced in
1927(complementing existing insurances for
health, accident and old age) - A generous benefit system emerged after World War
II, especially during the economic boom in the
1960s - ALMP introduced when unemployment started to rise
in the 1970s - When unemployment was still low, measures were
designed to prevent rather than to combat
unemployment - After German reunification, ALMP played a central
role in alleviating the social consequences of
the breakdown of the economy in East Germany - For instance, in 1992 the number of individuals
participating in job creation schemes or
training programs exceeded the number of
unemployed (in East Germany)
9Labor Market Institutions Set-Up during the 1990s
- Unemployment benefits (UB) meant to maintain the
workers social status during unemployment rather
than providing a safety net as a last resort - Duration 6 to 32 months (depending on previous
employment duration and age) - Amount 67 percent of last net income maximum
4,250 per month(60 percent without children) - Financing unemployment insurance contributions
(employers/employees) - Unemployment assistance (UA) paid after UB
entitlement period had expired - Duration without time limit (!)
- Amount 57 percent of last net income(53 percent
without children) - Financing taxes
- Social assistance (SA) as a possibility to
supplement UB/UA - Every household with an income below a certain
threshold qualified for SA
10Labor Market Institutions The Need for Reforms
(1/2)
- Passive Labor Market Policy
- Unlimited UB/UA payment duration extraordinary
feature of the German system - Replacement rates for long-term unemployed were
higher than in any other OECD country (OECD,
2004) - Replacement rates for short-time unemployed
comparable to many other OECD countries - Incentives to take up a job were very low,
especially for low-skilled - Generous benefit levels
- High benefit reduction rates
11Labor Market Institutions The Need for Reforms
(2/2)
- Active Labor Market Policy
- High expenditure levels and long durations of
programs - Most important programs
- Job creation schemes
- Training programs
- Job search assistance and monitoring was given
low priority - Sanctions were rarely implemented
- Assignment to programs based on the caseworkers
discretion (no systematic individual profiling) - No systematic evaluation
12Major Labor Market Reforms (2003-2005)Hartz
Reforms
- Implementation in four waves (Hartz I-IV)
between 2003 and 2005 - Hartz I-III
- Stronger role of activation (e.g. sanctions)
- Significant reduction of long-term benefits
- Massive deregulation of fixed-term contracts,
agency work and marginal part-time - Hartz IV
- Restructuring of the unemployment benefit and
social assistance schemes - Means-tested flat-rate benefit replaced
earning-related long-term unemployment
assistance -
? Implementation of the reforms was tied to an
evaluation mandate
13Underlying Principles of the Reforms
-
- improving employment services and policy
measures - activating the unemployed according to the
principles of right and duties - stimulating employment demand by deregulating the
labor market - Shift towards activation, effectiveness and
efficiency
core element principle of rights and duties
14Threefold Reform Approach (1/3)
- Improving employment services and policy
measures - Re-designing of old measures and introduction of
new measures of ALMP - Modernization of employment services along the
lines of New Public Management - Results-based accountability of local employment
offices - Outsourcing of many offices
- Open competition between private service
providersCustomer-orientated one-stop-centers,
offering individual profiling, job search
assistance, social services and administration of
benefit payments
15Threefold Reform Approach (2/3)
- Activating the unemployed according to the
principle of right and duties - Implementation of an activation strategy in
various policy changes - Priority to measures that support unemployed
workers who are pro-actively seeking integration
into regular employment - Introduction of jobs exempt from any or with
reduced social security contributions to take up
employment in low wage sector - Minijobs/ Midijobs
- Restructuring of the benefit-system
- Reduction of unemployment benefit levels and
durations - Eligibility for subsistence allowances according
to a person's ability to work rather than
according to previous contribution payments - Possibility of benefit sanctions and reductions
16Threefold Reform Approach (3/3)
- Stimulating employment demand by deregulating the
labor market - Deregulation of the temporary work sector
- Introduction of exemptions from restrictions on
fixed-term contracts and dismissal protection
17Overall Reform Effects Evolution of the German
Labor Force (1992-2007)
Decrease in the share of inactive individuals
Growth of flexible jobs
Decrease in the share of permanent full-time
employment
Source SOEP
18Growth of Flexible JobsOECD EPL Index
(1985-2008)
Continuous deregulation of temporary contracts
Source OECD
19ALMP Lessons from the Mandatory Evaluation
- Only a small part of the German ALMP effectively
improves individual reemployment probabilities - Training programs
- Start-up subsidies
- Wage subsidies
- Placement vouchers
- ... but further evaluation needed to assess
long-term effects - Reduced range of ALMP
- Focus on programs with proven positive effects
20Lessons learned? ALMP Expenditures in Germany
have decreased by about one-third (2002-2006)
- Expenditure increased
- Start-up subsidies
- Expenditure decreased
- Training programs
- Job creation schemes
- Wage subsidies
(in million )
Source Eichhorst and Zimmermann (2007)
21Further Results of the Mandatory Evaluation
- Re-organization of public employment services
mainly successful counseling and placement
were intensified in the course of the reforms
with the exception of outsourcing of services - Re-designing training programs seems to have
improved their effectiveness - Significant positive effects of the redesigned
wage subsidies and start-up subsidies - Job creation schemes continue to be detrimental
for participants employment prospects
22The Example of Training Programs Training
Vouchers and Stricter Selection Criteria
- Overall finding
- The effectiveness of training programs for the
unemployed has increased after the reforms - ... but which features of the reforms have
caused this increase and to what extent? - Introduction of training vouchers
- Job seekers are free to select their training
provider in the market (previously this choice
was made by the caseworker) - Stricter selection criteria
- Stricter selection of the participants by the
caseworkers based on the expected reemployment
probability
23Decomposing the Reform Impact on the
Effectiveness of Training Programs
Voucher Effect
Selection Effect
Source Rinne, Uhlendorff and Zhao (2008)
- Introduction of vouchers increased the
effectiveness of training programs in Germany - Stricter selection does not improve effectiveness
24Conclusions How to effectively design labor
market policy?
- Two elements of passive labor market policy
- Maintaining the workers social status during
unemployment(for a predetermined, finite period) - Providing a safety net as a last resort
- Systematic approach towards active labor market
policy - Evaluate the programs effectiveness
- Focus on programs with proven positive effects
- Activating the unemployed
- Principle of rights and duties
- Efficient placement services(but networks in
general more efficient) - Flexibility AND Security
25Klaus F. Zimmermann IZA, DIW Berlin and Bonn
University IZA, P.O. Box 7240, 53072 Bonn,
Germany Phone 49 (0) 228 - 38 94 0 Fax 49 (0)
228 - 38 94 180 E-mail zimmermann_at_iza.org www.iz
a.org