Lessons from German Labor Market Policy Klaus F' Zimmermann IZA, DIW Berlin and Bonn University Sept - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Lessons from German Labor Market Policy Klaus F' Zimmermann IZA, DIW Berlin and Bonn University Sept

Description:

Training Vouchers and Stricter Selection Criteria. Overall finding: ... Stricter selection does not improve effectiveness. Voucher Effect. Selection Effect ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Iza58
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lessons from German Labor Market Policy Klaus F' Zimmermann IZA, DIW Berlin and Bonn University Sept


1
Lessons from German Labor Market PolicyKlaus
F. ZimmermannIZA, DIW Berlin and Bonn University
September 25, 2009Chinese University of Hong
Kong
2
Outline
  • The German Labor Market An Overview
  • Structural Deficits before 2003
  • Major Labor Market Reforms (2003-2005, Hartz
    Reforms)
  • ALMP The German Experience
  • Conclusions The Design of Labor Market Policy

3
The German Labor Market An Overview
  • High unemployment as a central problem in
    post-unification Germany
  • This has often been linked to
  • The high level of employment protection
  • The high labor costs
  • The strictly regulated labor market
  • Protection of employment risks characterized by
  • High level of statutory employment protection for
    regular contracts
  • Predominance of compulsory social insurance
    providing earnings-related benefits in case of
    unemployment after a sufficient contribution
    period
  • Until 2005 also earnings-related long-term
    unemployment assistance
  • Replaced by a means-tested flat rate benefit in
    2005 Major break with Germanys long tradition
    of status maintenance in case of unemployment
  • Part of a broader policy shift towards activation
    (Hartz reforms)

4
Unemployment in Germany (1960-2009)
Dotcom bubble
Hartz reforms
German reunification
Oil crises
Post-war economic boom
Source Federal Employment Agency
  • In October 2008 the unemployment dropped under
    the level of 3 million for the first time since
    1992
  • This might be an indication that the fundamental
    structural problems of the German labor market
    could have been decisively loosen by the Hartz
    reforms

5
Policy Responses to the German Reunification
  • After the German reunification, the integration
    of the East German economy led to an increase in
    unemployment
  • The political decision to finance a large share
    of the transition costs through social insurance
    contributions (and not by general taxation)
    increased the burden on labor costs
  • Policymakers reacted in a selective way
  • Higher non-wage labor costs put pressure on
    standard forms of employment and dampened new
    employment opportunities
  • Growth of flexible jobs, i.e., non-standard forms
    of employment, facilitated by several legislative
    steps that required less employment regulation,
    involved lower or no non-wage labor costs, or
    offered even subsidies for such employment forms
  • Additionally, active labor market policy (ALMP)
    measures were extensively used in East Germany
  • In particular, public training programs and job
    creation schemes

6
Post-Unification Germany Development of
Standard vs. Non-Standard Forms of Employment
Source Federal Employment Agency
  • Non-standard forms of employment gained
    importance in recent years
  • Increase particularly strong in 2003 and 2004

7
Post-Unification Germany Extensive Use of Job
Creation Schemes and Public Training Programs
... but both traditional ALMP measures in
Germany lost importance in recent years
Source Federal Employment Agency.
8
Labor Market Institutions Historical Perspective
  • Compulsory unemployment insurance introduced in
    1927(complementing existing insurances for
    health, accident and old age)
  • A generous benefit system emerged after World War
    II, especially during the economic boom in the
    1960s
  • ALMP introduced when unemployment started to rise
    in the 1970s
  • When unemployment was still low, measures were
    designed to prevent rather than to combat
    unemployment
  • After German reunification, ALMP played a central
    role in alleviating the social consequences of
    the breakdown of the economy in East Germany
  • For instance, in 1992 the number of individuals
    participating in job creation schemes or
    training programs exceeded the number of
    unemployed (in East Germany)

9
Labor Market Institutions Set-Up during the 1990s
  • Unemployment benefits (UB) meant to maintain the
    workers social status during unemployment rather
    than providing a safety net as a last resort
  • Duration 6 to 32 months (depending on previous
    employment duration and age)
  • Amount 67 percent of last net income maximum
    4,250 per month(60 percent without children)
  • Financing unemployment insurance contributions
    (employers/employees)
  • Unemployment assistance (UA) paid after UB
    entitlement period had expired
  • Duration without time limit (!)
  • Amount 57 percent of last net income(53 percent
    without children)
  • Financing taxes
  • Social assistance (SA) as a possibility to
    supplement UB/UA
  • Every household with an income below a certain
    threshold qualified for SA

10
Labor Market Institutions The Need for Reforms
(1/2)
  • Passive Labor Market Policy
  • Unlimited UB/UA payment duration extraordinary
    feature of the German system
  • Replacement rates for long-term unemployed were
    higher than in any other OECD country (OECD,
    2004)
  • Replacement rates for short-time unemployed
    comparable to many other OECD countries
  • Incentives to take up a job were very low,
    especially for low-skilled
  • Generous benefit levels
  • High benefit reduction rates

11
Labor Market Institutions The Need for Reforms
(2/2)
  • Active Labor Market Policy
  • High expenditure levels and long durations of
    programs
  • Most important programs
  • Job creation schemes
  • Training programs
  • Job search assistance and monitoring was given
    low priority
  • Sanctions were rarely implemented
  • Assignment to programs based on the caseworkers
    discretion (no systematic individual profiling)
  • No systematic evaluation

12
Major Labor Market Reforms (2003-2005)Hartz
Reforms
  • Implementation in four waves (Hartz I-IV)
    between 2003 and 2005
  • Hartz I-III
  • Stronger role of activation (e.g. sanctions)
  • Significant reduction of long-term benefits
  • Massive deregulation of fixed-term contracts,
    agency work and marginal part-time
  • Hartz IV
  • Restructuring of the unemployment benefit and
    social assistance schemes
  • Means-tested flat-rate benefit replaced
    earning-related long-term unemployment
    assistance

? Implementation of the reforms was tied to an
evaluation mandate
13
Underlying Principles of the Reforms
  • improving employment services and policy
    measures
  • activating the unemployed according to the
    principles of right and duties
  • stimulating employment demand by deregulating the
    labor market
  • Shift towards activation, effectiveness and
    efficiency

core element principle of rights and duties
14
Threefold Reform Approach (1/3)
  • Improving employment services and policy
    measures
  • Re-designing of old measures and introduction of
    new measures of ALMP
  • Modernization of employment services along the
    lines of New Public Management
  • Results-based accountability of local employment
    offices
  • Outsourcing of many offices
  • Open competition between private service
    providersCustomer-orientated one-stop-centers,
    offering individual profiling, job search
    assistance, social services and administration of
    benefit payments

15
Threefold Reform Approach (2/3)
  • Activating the unemployed according to the
    principle of right and duties
  • Implementation of an activation strategy in
    various policy changes
  • Priority to measures that support unemployed
    workers who are pro-actively seeking integration
    into regular employment
  • Introduction of jobs exempt from any or with
    reduced social security contributions to take up
    employment in low wage sector
  • Minijobs/ Midijobs
  • Restructuring of the benefit-system
  • Reduction of unemployment benefit levels and
    durations
  • Eligibility for subsistence allowances according
    to a person's ability to work rather than
    according to previous contribution payments
  • Possibility of benefit sanctions and reductions

16
Threefold Reform Approach (3/3)
  • Stimulating employment demand by deregulating the
    labor market
  • Deregulation of the temporary work sector
  • Introduction of exemptions from restrictions on
    fixed-term contracts and dismissal protection

17
Overall Reform Effects Evolution of the German
Labor Force (1992-2007)
Decrease in the share of inactive individuals
Growth of flexible jobs
Decrease in the share of permanent full-time
employment
Source SOEP
18
Growth of Flexible JobsOECD EPL Index
(1985-2008)
Continuous deregulation of temporary contracts
Source OECD
19
ALMP Lessons from the Mandatory Evaluation
  • Only a small part of the German ALMP effectively
    improves individual reemployment probabilities
  • Training programs
  • Start-up subsidies
  • Wage subsidies
  • Placement vouchers
  • ... but further evaluation needed to assess
    long-term effects
  • Reduced range of ALMP
  • Focus on programs with proven positive effects

20
Lessons learned? ALMP Expenditures in Germany
have decreased by about one-third (2002-2006)
  • Expenditure increased
  • Start-up subsidies
  • Expenditure decreased
  • Training programs
  • Job creation schemes
  • Wage subsidies

(in million )
Source Eichhorst and Zimmermann (2007)
21
Further Results of the Mandatory Evaluation
  • Re-organization of public employment services
    mainly successful counseling and placement
    were intensified in the course of the reforms
    with the exception of outsourcing of services
  • Re-designing training programs seems to have
    improved their effectiveness
  • Significant positive effects of the redesigned
    wage subsidies and start-up subsidies
  • Job creation schemes continue to be detrimental
    for participants employment prospects

22
The Example of Training Programs Training
Vouchers and Stricter Selection Criteria
  • Overall finding
  • The effectiveness of training programs for the
    unemployed has increased after the reforms
  • ... but which features of the reforms have
    caused this increase and to what extent?
  • Introduction of training vouchers
  • Job seekers are free to select their training
    provider in the market (previously this choice
    was made by the caseworker)
  • Stricter selection criteria
  • Stricter selection of the participants by the
    caseworkers based on the expected reemployment
    probability

23
Decomposing the Reform Impact on the
Effectiveness of Training Programs
Voucher Effect
Selection Effect
Source Rinne, Uhlendorff and Zhao (2008)
  • Introduction of vouchers increased the
    effectiveness of training programs in Germany
  • Stricter selection does not improve effectiveness

24
Conclusions How to effectively design labor
market policy?
  • Two elements of passive labor market policy
  • Maintaining the workers social status during
    unemployment(for a predetermined, finite period)
  • Providing a safety net as a last resort
  • Systematic approach towards active labor market
    policy
  • Evaluate the programs effectiveness
  • Focus on programs with proven positive effects
  • Activating the unemployed
  • Principle of rights and duties
  • Efficient placement services(but networks in
    general more efficient)
  • Flexibility AND Security

25
Klaus F. Zimmermann IZA, DIW Berlin and Bonn
University IZA, P.O. Box 7240, 53072 Bonn,
Germany Phone 49 (0) 228 - 38 94 0 Fax 49 (0)
228 - 38 94 180 E-mail zimmermann_at_iza.org www.iz
a.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com