Westlake City School District We Educate for Excellence''' 2020 Vision Committee October 7, 2009

1
Westlake City School DistrictWe Educate for
Excellence... 20/20 Vision CommitteeOctober
7, 2009
2
Overview of 20/20 Process

• Facility Focus Group

Mike Bilardo, Hyland
Software  Jim Connole,
City Council Nate Cross,
City Planning Commission Mark Doran,
Energizer, Inc.  Dan Keenan,
Westlake City Schools Chris Milowicki,
CJ Tom Builders Mark Pepera,
Westlake City Schools Dave Puffer,
Westlake City Schools Nancy Schill,
Schill Architecture Steve
Schill, Schill
Architecture Steve Steffas,
C.B. Richard Ellis Property Management
3
Overview of 20/20 Process

• Facility Focus Group Findings and
  Recommendations
• A real problem exists that needs immediate
  attention
• Demonstrate care and pride in facilities by
  making positive changes with existing budget and
  maintaining the right way
• Move forward on engaging the entire community
• Conduct community forums to inform and seek input
• Establish a 20/20 Vision Committee to develop a
  plan using data and community input
• Include a long term maintenance plan
• Have a facility plan that reflects the
  communitys values
• Do the job well, on budget, and plan maintenance

4
Overview of 20/20 Process

• Vision 20/20 Committee Members
• The 24 member committee is multi-generational,
  represents public school and private school
  parents, those without children, civic leaders,
  business leaders, faculty and student
  representation

Harry Applegate Annette Caraulia Brian
Gottfried Duane Miller Steve Schill Julie
McCallister Del Younglis Jon Dregalla Bob
Hertl Kim Mather Chris Milowicki Cathy
Axcell Nancy Schill Mike Medoro Steve Steffas Dan
Keenan Andrew Mangels Bonnie Smith Jeff
Williams Melisa Yeoman Bill Baddour Mark
Pepera Nate Cross Dave Puffer
5
Overview of 20/20 Process

• Summary of 20/20 Meetings
• During the 6 meetings committee members
• Analyzed and requested various data
• Prioritized plans
• Discussed pros and challenges for each plan
• Listed important areas that needed to be
  considered for facilities
• Debated each plan with strengths, weaknesses,
  opportunities and threats
• Everyone, including people with connections to
  the school and without, strongly agreed there was
  a problem that needed to be addressed responsibly
  and soon.

6
Overview of 20/20 Process Vision 20/20
Committee Master Plan Options
7

• Building Assessments
• Master Plan Options
• Bob McAuliffe
• Senior Manager, Hammond Construction
• OSFC - RPC (Regional Program Consultant)
• Todd Wrobleski, AIA, Principal-In-Charge
• MKC Associates, Inc.
• Architects - Engineers - Planners

8
Building Assessments Master Plan Options
Additional Option Phasing, or Segmenting
version of Vision Group Options 1 or 2
9
Building Assessments Enrollment Projections

• Process
• District request - to OSFC (Ohio School
  Facilities Commission)
• OSFC assigns Regional Planning Coordinator
• Appoints Pre-qualified Assessment Firm
• CEFPI (Council of Educational Facility Planners
  Intl.) Standards
• Student Enrollment Projections
• Districts Architect/Engineering Firm and
  Regional Planning Coordinator review the
  assessment to assure accuracy

10
Building Assessments Enrollment Projections
Enrollment Inflation Data OSFC Enrollment
Projection
OSDM Construction Inflation Rate
Construction Cost Inflation
Ohio School Design Manual
11
Building Assessments
Rating 1 Satisfactory 2 Needs
Repair 3 Needs Replacement Based on 2009
OSFC Cost Set
12
Building Assessments
Renovate/Replace compares cost of
assessment-based renovation to new construction
cost of the same-sized building Does not
include cost of additional space required to
serve the number of students (by OSFC standards)
in that building
13
Building Assessments
14
Building Assessments
meeting OSFC Standards - renovate to
assessments and SF/Student standards
15
Master Plan Recap
Building Assessments - Master Plan Options -
Recap
Does Not include LFIs (Locally Funded
Initiatives)
16

• Process Going
• Forward
• Steve Miller
• Educational Facility Planner
• MKC Associates, Inc.
• Architects - Engineers - Planners

17
Process Going Forward

• Staff Engagement Discussion of Master Plan
  Options 1 and 2

18
Process Going Forward
19

• Break-Out
• Session
• Steve Miller
• Educational Facility Planner
• MKC Associates, Inc.
• Architects - Engineers - Planners

20
Break-Out Session

• We have scheduled informative presentations to
  include
• Scope and Budget
• Educational Considerations
• Operating Issues
• Site Considerations
• Co Curricular Considerations
• Funding Options
• What other information do you need to select a
  Master Plan?

21
Thank You !www.wlake.orgNext Meeting
October 21st
Westlake City School DistrictWe Educate for
Excellence...