Affect Sensing in Speech: Studying Fusion of Linguistic and Acoustic Features - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Affect Sensing in Speech: Studying Fusion of Linguistic and Acoustic Features

Description:

Insignificant improvement through fusion (about 2%) Maximal ... Insignificant improvement through fusion (about 2%) Feature-level Fusion Before Discretization ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: kat7176
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Affect Sensing in Speech: Studying Fusion of Linguistic and Acoustic Features


1
Affect Sensing in Speech Studying Fusion of
Linguistic and Acoustic Features
  • Alexander Osherenko, Elisabeth André, Thurid Vogt
  • University of Augsburg

2
Affect Sensing
  • Acoustic information
  • Linguistic information (lexical, stylometric,
    deictic)

3
Fusion
  • Decision-level
  • Feature-level

4
Research Questions
  • Fusion
  • Context
  • Decision-level vs. feature-level

5
Experimental Setting
  • SAL corpus, 574 turns, 5 classes
  • Decision-level using majority, feature-level
    fusing features
  • Data 2 stages (history 0 and history 7)
  • Acoustic modality - 2 (discrete/continuous)
    acoustic datasets (A)
  • Lingustic modality - 29 lexical (L), 31
    stylometric (S), 63 deictic datasets (D)

6
Results representation
  • Tree
  • Nodes features from particular modalities (A,
    L,S, D)
  • Values
  • Maximal recall value
  • Maximal multimodality value
  • Dotted arcs

7
Decision-level Fusion Before Discretization
  • Best results 64.2 (history 7) and 44.2
    (history 0)
  • Significant improvement through context
  • Insignificant improvement through fusion (about
    2)
  • Maximal multimodality value (76.5)

8
Decision-level Fusion After Discretization
  • Best results 66.0 (history 7) and 49.0
    (history 0)
  • Significant improvement through context
  • Insignificant improvement through fusion (about
    2)
  • Maximal multimodality value (77.8)

9
Feature-level Fusion Before Discretization
  • Best results 62.8 vs. 64.2 (history 7) and
    46.7 vs. 44.2 (history 0)
  • Significant improvement through context
  • Insignificant improvement through fusion (about
    2)

10
Feature-level Fusion After Discretization
  • Best results 67.5 vs. 64.9 (history 7) and
    52.8 vs. 45.9 (history 0)
  • Significant improvement through context
  • Insignificant improvement through fusion (about
    2)

11
Discussion
  • Role of context
  • Role of discretization
  • Fusion?

12
Future work
  • New modalities
  • Weighting
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com