Advanced Higher Modern Studies - Question 6 Exemplar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Advanced Higher Modern Studies - Question 6 Exemplar

Description:

the fact that it is an opinion poll ... how the poll was conducted ... is an internationally respected polling company ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: learn79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Advanced Higher Modern Studies - Question 6 Exemplar


1
  • Question Paper
  • 2005
  • Question 6

2
  • Question Paper 2005,
  • Question 6

6 (a) Outline the strengths and weaknesses of
this source for a researcher interested in
measuring public support for ID cards. (10)
6 (b) Suggest, giving reasons, one alternative
method by which the information could be
presented in order to make it easier for a
researcher to use. (5)
3
  • Question 6
  • 2005

Outline the strengths and weaknesses of
this source for a researcher interested in
measuring public support for ID cards. (10)
Key word this source means that you must
examine the source of the information very
carefully.
  • You should focus on
  • the fact that it is an opinion poll
  • the fact that the opinion poll was carried out by
    MORI, an internationally respected polling
    company
  • how the poll was conducted

4
Outline the strengths and weaknesses of
this source for a researcher interested in
measuring public support for ID cards. (10)
  • Question 6
  • 2005
  • date on which the poll was carried out
  • characteristics of the sample
  • who has been sampled
  • and who has been left out?
  • size of the sample
  • use of weighting
  • use of rounding
  • type of questions asked

5
  • Question 6 2005
  • Question asks you to describe and explain the
    strengths and weaknesses of this source of
    information.
  • Your answer therefore must be balanced for full
    marks.
  • This means that you must address both the
    strengths and the weaknesses.

6
  • Question 6 2005
  • If you do not, your answer will be marked out of
    6 marks and not 10.
  • Your answer though does not have to be equally
    balanced.
  • It is possible to achieve 6 marks for strengths
    and 4 marks for weaknesses or vice versa.

7
  • Question 6 2005
  • You will get a lot of credit for developing your
    points and for providing exemplification.
  • Answers that simply list points will not receive
    a high mark.
  • Answers that show a lack of knowledge or
    understanding of the issue will not achieve high
    marks.

8
Company used to carry out the opinion poll MORI
  • Strengths
  • is an internationally respected polling company
  • has a lot of experience in carrying out opinion
    polls knows importance of sample size,
    characteristics of sample population etc. and has
    to stay in business so it has to maintain its
    credibility as a polling company.
  • has to stay in business so it has to maintain its
    credibility as a polling company. used by many
    high profile companies such as market research,
    newspapers and political parties to gauge public
    opinion on many issues.
  • is used by many high profile companies such as
    market research, newspapers and political parties
    to gauge public opinion on many issues.

9
  • Question 6
  • 2005
  • Strengths

Company used weighting to choose the sample
  • Weighting ensures that the sample of 1000 people
    aged 18 and over are representative of the whole
    population of the UK.
  • Weighting takes into account the following
    characteristics of the UK population
  • its age structure
  • its gender structure
  • socio-economic structure.

10
  • Question 6 2005
  • Weaknesses
  • Many critics of opinion polls wonder how a
    sample of around 1000 people can be
    representative of the opinions of millions of
    people.

Size of sample - 1000
Use of computer rounding
  • This will introduce statistical error into the
    final results reducing their level of accuracy.

11
Research method used advantages and
disadvantages
  • Question 6 2005
  • Strengths
  • Advantages of telephone interviewing using RDD
    Random Digit Dialling.
  • RDD provides a representative probability sample
    of all telephone users, unlike telephone surveys
    which rely on registered telephone number lists
    or directories. (Telephone interviewing has
    traditionally been regarded as unreliable because
    of the difficulty of obtaining an unbiased
    genuinely random sample from the phone book).
  • ICM and Gallup argued that 94 of the population
    could now be contacted by phone. RDD can be used
    to contact ex-directory numbers.
  • Good because people who are ex-directory can now
    be contacted mainly female, people living on
    their own no longer excluded from the sample.

12
Research method used advantages and
disadvantages
  • Question 6 2005
  • Strengths
  • Advantages of telephone interviewing using RDD
    Random Digit Dialling.
  • Telephone interviewing makes it easier and
    cheaper to get a wider sample in terms of
    geographical positioning avoids clustering which
    happens with postal surveys.
  • Allows for more stringent checks to be carried
    out on those who are interviewing because they
    are all based in one central position rather than
    being spread throughout the country.

13
  • Question 6
  • 2005
  • Weaknesses

Research method used advantages and
disadvantages
  • Disadvantages of telephone interviewing using RDD
    Random Digit Dialling.
  • 10 of the UK population do not have a telephone
    these people are also excluded from the survey
    mainly people in the lower socio-economic
    groups in society.
  • Still the problem of obtaining a response-
    non-contacts and refusals.
  • Still the problem of reliability of information
    received over the phone. People find it easier to
    make false comments on the phone. Is the person
    on the phone who they say they are?

14
  • Question 6
  • 2005
  • Weaknesses

Reliability of opinion polls as a source of
information
  • Opinion polls are inherently limited in their
    value as predictors because they only represent a
    snap-shot of public opinion at the time the
    survey is carried out and the results go to
    press.
  • Opinion polls can only measure what people say.
    What people say and actually do are often not the
    same and so if used to predict how people might
    vote on the issue, opinion polls are not accurate.

15
Reliability of opinion polls as a source of
information
  • Question 6
  • 2005
  • Weaknesses
  • This poll was carried out between 18 and 23
    March 2004 but the results were not published
    until 23 April 2004.
  • Some of the respondents may well have changed
    their mind on the issue during that time. Results
    therefore may not be an accurate reflection of
    public opinion.

16
  • Question 6
  • 2005
  • Weaknesses

Reliability of opinion polls as a source of
information
  • 1972, 1992 General Elections - opinion polls
    carried out during the election campaign came
    under criticism for high level of inaccuracy.
  • Opinion polls since 1970 have predicted the
    wrong outcome in 5 out 7 elections.

17
  • Question 6
  • 2005
  • Weaknesses

Reliability of opinion polls as a source of
information
  • Some people are inclined to give politically
    correct answers to questions. This will
    inevitably increase the chances and size of error
    in the result.
  • Many critics of opinion polls wonder how a
    sample of around 1000 people can be
    representative of the opinions of millions of
    people.

18
Type of questions asked in the opinion poll
  • Question 6
  • 2005
  • Questions are examples of closed questions
    they give the respondent a choice of answers from
    a directed list. Gives standardised answers.
  • Advantages
  • Standardised answers make it possible to identify
    patterns and make comparisons between the
    different groups of people such as between males
    and females or between working-class and
    middle-class.
  • Results can be replicated easily to check for
    reliability.
  • Same questions can be repeated at a future date
    in order to make comparisons over time
    longitudinal study.
  • Reduces possibility of interviewer bias.

19
Type of questions asked in the opinion poll
  • Question 6
  • 2005
  • Disadvantages
  • With closed questions it is difficult for
    respondents to elaborate or develop their answers
    in depth. This means that the results may not be
    wholly valid in that they do not give a true
    picture of the respondents point of view.
  • Difficult to make generalisations or assumptions
    based on the results.

20
  • Key words information, presented, easier, a
    researcher.
  • Consider how the information is presented by MORI
    e.g.
  • The questions are written in bold.
  • The standardised answers are listed underneath.
  • The number who responded to each standardised
    answer is given beside it in s.
  • How could this be improved upon?
  • Question 6
  • 2005

b) Suggest giving reasons, one alternative way
in which the information in the source could be
presented in order to make it easier for a
researcher to use.
21
Primary data that is collected in statistical
form can be presented in a variety of graphical
ways.
  • Presenting and
  • Analysing Results

Presenting data in this way is very important
because it helps analysis.
  • Question 6
  • 2005

22
  • Presenting and
  • Analysing Results
  • Question 6
  • 2005

23
There is a huge range of graphical
and cartographical techniques available
  • Presenting and
  • Analysing Results

The technique you use will depend on the type
of data collected
  • Question 6
  • 2005

24
Whatever the technique chosen, it should be
  • Presenting
  • data

neat, colourful and annotated, in order to ensure
its impact and effectiveness.
25
  • Presenting
  • field data

So all diagrams must have
a labelled axis
a title
a key
and be referred to in the text
colour
26
  • Presentation
  • Techniques

Results of Opinion Poll on Identity Cards
  • A comparative bar graph is used to show the
    frequency or amount of a number of different
    categories or questions.
  • The bars are drawn with a gap in between them,
    and they are coloured or shaded differently. This
    is because the categories are unconnected.

27
  • Presentation
  • Techniques

Results of Question (i) To what extent, if at
all, are you in favour of, or opposed to, a
national identity card scheme?
  • This method of presenting the results is called a
    histogram used when results are connected
    yes, no, dont know
  • It has the same advantages as for a bar graph
    however in this example three histograms would
    have to be drawn
  • one for each question
  • a different colour could be used for each
    question.

28
  • Presentation
  • Techniques

Results of Opinion Poll on Identity Cards
This is an example of a comparative bar graph on
its side. It has the same advantages as for the
vertical presentation.
Key
Yes
No
Dont know
29
  • Presentation
  • Techniques

Results of Question (i) To what extent, if at
all, are you in favour of, or opposed to, a
national identity card scheme?
This is an example of a bar graph on its side. It
has the same advantages as for the vertical
presentation.
30
  • Presentation techniques
  • Pie charts

31
  • Presentation techniques
  • Pie charts
  • Advantages
  • A pie chart is a good way of showing how a whole
    is divided up in this case the answers to the
    question.
  • Each segment of the pie represents the possible
    answers to the question.
  • The size of a segment represents the percentage
    support for that answer e.g. Dont know 1.
  • The use of different colours for each segment
    makes it easier to distinguish between the
    different levels of support for each answer.

32
  • Presentation techniques
  • Pie charts
  • Good way of comparing and analysing the results
    for all three questions.

33
  • Question 6(b)
  • 2005
  • No marks are given for the choice of alternative
    method of presentation.
  • Marks are given for the explanation of method
    chosen e.g. why that method would be easier for a
    researcher.
  • For full marks you would have to give at least
    two well developed points.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com