An Ecological Economics Capital Stock Approach to Quality of Life Assessment in Burlington, Vermont, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

An Ecological Economics Capital Stock Approach to Quality of Life Assessment in Burlington, Vermont,

Description:

An Ecological Economics Capital Stock Approach to Quality of Life Assessment in Burlington, Vermont, – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: JonDEr4
Learn more at: https://www.uvm.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An Ecological Economics Capital Stock Approach to Quality of Life Assessment in Burlington, Vermont,


1
An Ecological Economics Capital Stock Approach to
Quality of Life Assessment in Burlington,
Vermont, USA
  • Andrews, C., Antonucci, J., Augeri, S., Berliet,
    E., Birkby, M., Brennan, W., Brown, E., Brundige,
    M., Buechler, M., Cohen, M., Coleman, C., Coogan,
    C., Cooper, A., Costello, K., Crane, M.,
    D'Aversa, A., Davis, A., DeCelles, J., Delgado,
    A., DiBiccari, M., Dudley, H., Dye, J., Effler,
    A., Egbers, M., Freeman, P., Gilmartin, M.,
    Graves, E., Hall, M., Hancock, C., Harrison, E.,
    Hartz, E., Hayes, K., Herold-Lind, C., Holthaus,
    R., Hubbard, D., Johansson, H., Junger, L.,
    Kelly, B., Kelly, J., Kirschner, A., Klein, A.,
    Martin, M., Marvin, I., McCreight, C.,
    O'Donoghue, B., Palmer, M., Parke, B.,
    Pearlstein, A., Randall, J., Reeves, C., Rosa,
    D., Smith, C., Smith, J., Sterling, R., Sullivan,
    C., Van Etten, T., Verinis, A., Virchick, P.,
    Voinov, A., Waters, J.

Photo Anton Voinov
2
Previous Surveys
3
Eight Neighborhoods
Thanks to Margaret Bozik from CEDO Burlington,
and Eric Brown our resident pizza guy!
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
Survey Questions
  • Neighborhood Identity
  • Built Capital
  • Natural Capital
  • Human Capital
  • Social Capital
  • Total Quality of Life
  • Demographics

Photo Anton Voinov
8
Neighborhood Identity
  • Please rank the top five regions according to
    which ones you most identify with as your home,
    from 1 (most identify) to 5 (least identify).

9
Importance vs. Happiness
  • For questions rating For questions rating
  • importance happiness
  • 1 Very important 1 Very happy
  • 2 Important 2 Happy
  • 3 Neither important 3 Neither happy
  • or unimportant or unhappy
  • 4 Unimportant 4 Unhappy
  • 5 Very unimportant 5 Very unhappy

Photo Anton Voinov
10
Built Capital
  • How important are the things you own or rent (for
    example, your home, car, furniture, clothes,
    etc.) to your happiness and quality of life?

Photo Anton Voinov
11
(No Transcript)
12
Mean Importance Home 1.58 Food
Drink 1.85 Transportation 2.24 Entertainment 2.64
Cons. Durables 2.67 Pers. Access. 2.67
Mean Happiness Food Drink 1.77 Home 1.85 Enter
tainment 2.08 Transportation 2.12 Pers.
Access. 2.16 Cons. Durables 2.19
13
City Wide Built Capital Happiness
Photo Anton Voinov
14
Are you happy with your current family or
personal yearly income?
Percent Yes for Burlington 66
15
If not, how much more income per year would you
need to be satisfied?
16
Natural Capital
  • How important is the quality of the natural
    environment in which you live (for example, air,
    water, open space, cleanliness) to your happiness
    and quality of life?

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Human Capital
  • How important are investments made in yourself
    (for example, education, job skills, health,
    spirituality) to your happiness and quality of
    life?

Photo Anton Voinov
20
(No Transcript)
21
Social Capital
  • How important are relationships with your family
    and friends to your happiness and quality of
    life?
  • How important are interactions with people in
    your neighborhood to your happiness and quality
    of life?

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Total Quality of Life
  • How would you rate your overall quality of life
    (on a scale from 1 very high to 5 very low)?
  • Please distribute 100 points across the following
    four categories according to their importance to
    your overall quality of life.
  • Personal and public investments in your home,
    lifestyle, and neighborhood
  • Investments and access to the natural
    environment in or near your neighborhood
  • Your personal well-being and investments made
    in yourself
  • Your relationship with your family, friends,
    and community

Photo Anton Voinov
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Testing the Income Effect
28
Testing the Income Effect
Without Students 21 of respondents
29
(No Transcript)
30
Neighborhood Analysis
31
Time Allocation
  • Please distribute 100 points across the following
    four categories according to their importance to
    your overall quality of life.
  • Personal and public investments in your home,
    lifestyle, and neighborhood
  • Investments and access to the natural
    environment in or near your neighborhood
  • Your personal well-being and investments made
    in yourself
  • Your relationship with your family, friends,
    and community

32
(No Transcript)
33
New North End
Ranking (Data) Avg. Quality of Life 6
(1.95) Avg. Happiness with Built
Capital 4 (1.99) Natural Capital 4
(2.01) Human Capital 4 (2.11) Social
Capital 2 (2.01) Avg. Time Spent doing
Employment 4 (33) Volunteer Activities 3
(9) Household Chores 1 (21)
Family Activities 2 (19) Personal
Activities 8 (20) Percent with Health Ins. 4
(93) Home Ownership 1 (73) Satisfied with
Yrly Income 2 (75)
34
Old North End
Ranking (Data) Avg. Quality of Life 8
(2.10) Avg. Happiness with Built
Capital 7 (2.11) Natural Capital 8
(2.35) Human Capital 2 (2.00) Social
Capital 4 (2.25) Avg. Time Spent doing
Employment 2 (37) Volunteer Activities 5
(7) Household Chores 3 (19)
Family Activities 8 (16) Personal
Activities 6 (23) Percent with Health Ins. 8
(81) Home Ownership 4 (55) Satisfied with
Yrly Income 7 (52)
35
Downtown
Ranking (Data) Avg. Quality of Life 7
(2.10) Avg. Happiness with Built
Capital 8 (2.29) Natural Capital 7
(2.34) Human Capital 5 (2.13) Social
Capital 8 (2.38) Avg. Time Spent doing
Employment 7 (26) Volunteer Activities 7
(7) Household Chores 4 (18)
Family Activities 6 (18) Personal
Activities 2 (33) Percent with Health Ins. 5
(93) Home Ownership 7 (15) Satisfied with
Yrly Income 5 (64)
36
Collegetown
Ranking (Data) Avg. Quality of Life 3
(1.88) Avg. Happiness with Built
Capital 5 (2.07) Natural Capital 6
(2.31) Human Capital 7 (2.22) Social
Capital 7 (2.33) Avg. Time Spent doing
Employment 5 (28) Volunteer Activities 8
(6) Household Chores 8 (14)
Family Activities 3 (19) Personal
Activities 1 (33) Percent with Health Ins. 7
(85) Home Ownership 6 (17) Satisfied w/
Yrly Income 8 (51)
37
Northeast
Ranking (Data) Avg. Quality of Life 5
(1.95) Avg. Happiness with Built
Capital 3 (1.92) Natural Capital 5
(2.21) Human Capital 3 (2.08) Social
Capital 6 (2.27) Avg. Time Spent doing
Employment 6 (27) Volunteer Activities 2
(11) Household Chores 2 (20)
Family Activities 7 (17) Personal
Activities 4 (27) Percent with Health Ins. 1
(100) Home Ownership 8 (7) Satisfied with
Yrly Income 3 (68)
38
The Hill
Ranking (Data) Avg. Quality of Life 1
(1.50) Avg. Happiness with Built
Capital 2 (1.88) Natural Capital 1
(1.78) Human Capital 1 (1.96) Social
Capital 1 (2.01) Avg. Time Spent doing
Employment 8 (24) Volunteer Activities 4
(8) Household Chores 7 (14)
Family Activities 1 (26) Personal
Activities 3 (29) Percent with Health Ins. 2
(98) Home Ownership 2 (73) Satisfied w/
Yrly Income 1 (77)
39
Pine Street
Ranking (Data) Avg. Quality of Life 4
(1.89) Avg. Happiness with Built
Capital 6 (2.08) Natural Capital 3
(1.98) Human Capital 8 (2.22) Social
Capital 3 (2.14) Avg. Time Spent doing
Employment 3 (33) Volunteer Activities 6
(7) Household Chores 5 (17)
Family Activities 5 (18) Personal
Activities 5 (24) Percent with Health Ins. 6
(90) Home Ownership 5 (51) Satisfied with
Yrly Income 6 (63)
40
South End
Ranking (Data) Avg. Quality of Life 2
(1.85) Avg. Happiness with Built
Capital 1 (1.82) Natural Capital 2
(1.92) Human Capital 6 (2.22) Social
Capital 5 (2.26) Avg. Time Spent doing
Employment 1 (37) Volunteer Activities 1
(13) Household Chores 6 (15)
Family Activities 4 (19) Personal
Activities 7 (21) Percent with Health Ins. 3
(95) Home Ownership 3 (61) Satisfied with
Yrly Income 4 (67)
41
Burlington v. EcoVillages
42
Thanks to
  • Burlington Legacy Project (www.cedo.ci.burlington.
    vt.us/legacy/)
  • In particular the Community Indicators committee,
    Betsy Rosenbluth, and Sandra OFlaherty.
  • Community and Economic Development Office
    (www.cedoburlington.org)
  • In particular Margaret Bozik and Beth Ruzansky.
  • UVM and Gund Faculty
  • In particular, Bob Costanza, Josh Farley, Lynne
    Bond, Matthew Wilson, Gary Flo, and Roel Boumans.

Photo Anton Voinov
43
Evolving analysis and results posted at
  • www.uvm.edu/jdericks/QOL/

Photo Anton Voinov
44
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com