Turnover, Layoffs, Buyouts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Turnover, Layoffs, Buyouts

Description:

C. The article takes no stand ' ... With fixed number of older workers, hiring more younger ... Professors who stayed were the ones no one else would hire ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: Babc
Learn more at: http://www.econ.ucsb.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Turnover, Layoffs, Buyouts


1
Chapter 4
  • Turnover, Layoffs, Buyouts

2
Reading for next class
  • http//valleywag.gawker.com/374442/its-april-1-and
    -i-dont-know-what-my-salary-is

3
Question from CNN Money reading
  • The article argues that taking a buyout offer
    from a firm (and retiring early instead of
    staying on) is
  • A. Usually a bad idea, except if firm is about to
    lay off workers
  • B. Usually a good idea, except if firm is growing
  • C. The article takes no stand
  • The enticements you'll get to retire early
    likely won't offset the drawbacks of spending
    fewer years at the office
  • Nonsense
  • 60 of workers find other jobs after taking the
    buyout
  • Value of leisure
  • Invalidates the whole argument

4
Clip
  • http//www.nbc.com/The_Office/video/clips/branch-c
    losing/116285/

5
Opinion Poll
  • Are lay-offs wrong?
  • A. Yes
  • B. No

6
Opinion Poll
  • Would it be better to lower all workers wages
    than to lay off some workers?
  • A. Yes
  • B. No

7
Opinion Poll
  • If lay-offs must occur, who should be laid off?
  • A. Older workers
  • B. Younger workers
  • C. Both
  • D. Pick randomly

8
Chapter Themes
  • When is turnover (quitting or layoffs) good for a
    firm?
  • Which groups should be targeted?
  • How do existing laws influence the
    decision-making process?
  • When and how to buy out older workers?
  • How to avoid adverse selection in turnover?

9
When is Turnover Good for a Firm?
  • When combination of workers by skill not profit
    maximizing.
  • Example Workers by age.
  • Older workers have more firm-specific skill
  • Younger workers, more recent ed., more technology
    savy.
  • With fixed number of older workers, hiring more
    younger workers increases output at diminishing
    rate.
  • (Works both ways).
  • Could have wrong mix

Qyoung

Qold
10
Factors that Favor Younger Workers
  • Rapid tech change
  • Most H.C. is attainable through schooling, not
    OJT
  • Firm does not need much firm-specific capital
  • Not quirky

Qyoung

Qold
11
What Makes Firm Alter its Mix?
  • Factors
  • Change in technology
  • Change in demand for product
  • Change in prices of inputs
  • Flexible firms survive
  • Non-flexible firms fail
  • Both worker and firm lose when firm fails

Qyoung

Qold
12
When firm needs to downsize, whom to lay off?
  • Most firms have some firm-specific H.C.
  • Initially firms lose money while subsidizing
    training
  • Later, make profits each year because VMPgtwage.
  • Rule
  • Firms want to keep worker if PDV of rent (gap
    between VMP and wages) gt0.

13
Analysis
  • Definitions
  • VtVMP(t)
  • Wtwage paid to worker.
  • Tretirement age
  • tcurrent age
  • rinterest rate
  • Initially, firm loses money
  • WtltVt
  • Later firm earns profit
  • VtgtWt
  • Rent to firm for keeping worker from t until T
    is


Wt
Vt
t
T
14
Question
  • Example R7
  • In the Figure, what appears to be true of the
    firms rent at time t7, R7
  • A. R7gt0
  • B. R7lt0
  • C. R70


Wt
Vt
t
7
T
15
Rents
  • Note 1 R00. Why?
  • Must pay worker what she is worth or similar
    firms steal worker and still make profit
  • Note 2 RT0. Why?
  • Invest initially, then get all of it back.
  • By the last instant of the last period, there is
    nothing left to get back.
  • (epsilon maybe)


Wt
Vt
t
T
16
Worker Alternative
  • Worker has alternative options,outside the firm
  • AtValue at t of best outside option
  • Generally this rises over time
  • Leisure more valuable when older.
  • Retirement, fishing, etc.


At
Wt
Vt
t
T
17
Graph of Rents
  • R00
  • Rt rising as worker gets trained
  • Already have some investment in worker, fewer
    periods of losses remain
  • Rt peaks as worker is fully trained
  • Only surplusses remain
  • Rt falls in later years
  • Fewer and fewer years of surplusses left
  • RT0


At
Wt
Vt
t
T
Rt
t
0
18
What Happens if Demand for Firms Product Falls?
  • Vt? at every pnt in time
  • Rt ? at every pnt in time so
  • Some workers now have negative rents
  • Whom do you lay off?
  • A. Oldest workers
  • B. Youngest workers
  • C. Both
  • D. Neither
  • E. Can tell
  • Makes sense to lay offoldest and youngest
  • Lowest rents


At
Wt
Vt
Vt
t
T
Rt
t
0
19
Legal Considerations
  • Age discrimination act
  • Prohibits firms from laying off based on age
  • Protects workers gt40
  • Upshot Cant be seen to lay off oldest workers
    first
  • Continental Can sued for 100s of millions of
    dollars.
  • Sidebar Law make sense?l
  • Why not lower wages to reflect lower VMP?
  • Contractual arrangement
  • Veiled attempt to fire
  • Workers dont like it


At
Wt
Vt
Vt
t
T
Rt
t
0
20
Buyouts
  • If you cant fire older workers, buy them out.
  • A buyout is an offer made to worker of specific
    age to retire early in exchange for severance pay
  • Voluntary
  • Pay them to go away.
  • Rule
  • Buyout when PV of workers alternative gt PV of
    productivity.

21
Buyouts Analysis (Workers)
  • Worker accepts buyout if BPV(At)gtPV(Wt)
  • Bgt PV(Wt)-PV(At)
  • Example Workers will accept buyout if
  • Bgtarea of small green triangle


At
Wt
Vt
Vt
t
T
Rt
t
0
22
Buyouts Analysis (Firms)
  • Firm offers buyout ifBltPV(Wt)-PV(Vt)
  • Note This assumes PV(Wt)gtPV(Vt).
  • Example Firm will want to buy out workers if
  • Bltarea of small blue triangle


At
Wt
Vt
Vt
t
T
Rt
t
0
23
Buyouts Analysis (Workers and Firms)
  • Firm offers if
  • BltPV(Wt)-PV(Vt)
  • Worker accepts if
  • BgtPV(Wt)-PV(At)
  • When both conditions holdPV(Wt)-PV(At)ltBlt
    PV(Wt)-PV(Vt)
  • -PV(At)lt -PV(Vt)
  • PV(At)gtPV(Vt)
  • Intution If what firm is losing on me is bigger
    than what I lose by choosing my next best job,
    firm can pay me to quit and were both better off


At
Wt
Vt
Vt
t
T
Rt
t
0
24
Buyouts Notes
  • Who least suited for buy-out?
  • Workers with lots of firm specific capital.
  • More valuable at the firm than elsewhere.
  • Low alternative options
  • High prody.
  • What about most productive workers?
  • They may cost more.
  • May be more productive elsewhere
  • Sometimes these should be bought out.
  • PV(At) high.


At
Wt
Vt
Vt
t
T
Rt
t
0
25
Opinion Poll
  • Buyout offered for 5 years. You decide to wait
    for a while to take buyout. In the meantime, do
    you
  • A. Try to be extra productive
  • B. Try to be unproductive
  • C. Make no change in effort

26
Moral Hazard
  • What happens if you have a buyout plan available
    for 5 yrs?
  • Worker acts unproductive so hell get generous
    buyout plan
  • This is moral hazard or hidden action problem
  • Solution Window plan. (Small time interval)


At
Wt
Vt
Vt
t
T
Rt
t
0
27
Example
  • Universities didnt want old tired professors
  • Solution adopted Universities offered early
    retirement incentives to older faculty.
  • Who took early retirement?
  • A. Productive professors
  • B. Unproductive professors
  • C. Cant tell

28
Example
  • The most able professors took early retirement
    packages, got jobs at other universities.
  • Professors who stayed were the ones no one else
    would hire
  • The ones they wanted to stay left, and the ones
    they wanted to leave stayed!
  • Classic problem of adverse selection!

29
How to fix?
  • Make retirement package more generous for less
    productive researchers.
  • If youre bad at your job, well pay you a lot to
    leave early.
  • If youre good at your job, we wont pay you much
    to leave early.
  • Problem. Could be unpopular. Looks like punishing
    workers for being productive!
  • How to get around this?

30
Question
  • As drawn, who requires a larger buyout to be
    willing to leave?
  • A. 64 year old workers
  • B. 60 year old workers
  • C. Cant tell


At
Wt
Vt
Vt
t
T
60
64
Rt
t
0
31
Question
  • In CNN reading, we learned that buyouts often
    offer a sweetened pension, with as much as five
    years added to your age and job tenure.
  • Say, full pension kicks in at 65. Who gets the
    bigger marginal gain from the buyout offer
  • A. The 64 year old worker who gets a sweetened
    pension and is treated as if he were 65.
  • B. The 60-year old worker who gets a sweetened
    pension and is treated as if he were 65
  • Better deal if you are younger!

32
Adverse Selection
  • You want to offer different buyout plans for
    different workers
  • 64 year old worker will take low buyout
  • 60 year olds require more
  • How to offer more to the workers you want to
    quit?
  • Law makes it hard to offer more to 60 than 64
    year olds.
  • Retirement bridge.
  • Means extra pension benefits the younger you are
  • Example CNN reading


At
Wt
Vt
Vt
t
T
60
64
Rt
t
0
33
Review

34
Lifecycle graph
  • Drawing lifecycle wages and productivities


At
Wt
Vt
t
35
Question 1
  • At which instant in time (A, B, C, D, or E) would
    the worker be earning the most profit for the
    firm?


At
Wt
Vt
B
C
D
A
E
t
36
Question 2
  • At which point in time is the total rent the
    firm gets for keeping the worker largest?


At
Wt
Vt
B
C
D
A
E
t
37
Question 3
  • At which point in time (A, B, C, D, or E) is the
    worker unwilling to work?


At
Wt
Vt
B
C
D
A
E
t
38
Other strategies
  • Some firms offer job placement programs to
    workers facing buyouts
  • Are these firms being completely unselfish?
  • A. Probably
  • B. Probably not


At
Wt
Vt
Vt
t
T
60
64
Rt
t
0
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com