Towards an Advanced Learning Infrastructure Based on Semantic Web Technologies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Towards an Advanced Learning Infrastructure Based on Semantic Web Technologies

Description:

How do we entice non-technical people to structure their data? ... Magpie plug-in for IE and now also Mozilla downloadable from ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: kmi2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Towards an Advanced Learning Infrastructure Based on Semantic Web Technologies


1
Towards an Advanced Learning Infrastructure Based
on Semantic Web Technologies
  • Martin Dzbor and Enrico Motta
  • Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University

KnowledgeWeb Workshop, 27th Sep 2004
2
Semantic Browsing and Semantic Services in
Education
3
Magpie Components
4
Semantically Enhanced Web Browsing
  • Zero overhead costs
  • Dynamic ontology-driven enrichment in real time
  • Utilizing interfaces familiar to the lay user
  • Resource re-usability openness
  • Gateway to the semantic web
  • Access knowledge through annotated web resources
  • Integrated with standard web browsers
  • Magpie services are first class concepts
  • Multiple user interaction modalities
  • User-requested (pull or clickgo) semantic
    services
  • Trigger (push or subscribelearn) semantic
    services
  • One-click (or less) interface

5
Value of tools like Magpie
  • Quan Karger (2004)
  • separate pieces of information about a single
    resource that used to require navigation through
    different web sites can be merged together
    without specialized portal sites or coordination
    between the sites
  • McDowell, Etzioni al. (2003)
  • How do we entice non-technical people to
    structure their data?
  • semantic annotation will be motivated by
    services giving immediate benefits instant
    gratification to the user.
  • Tauscher Greenberg (2001)
  • lt 1 browsing actions use explicit history
    mechanisms
  • Browsing history needs better representation that
    would be meaningful to the user.

6
Supporting different learning modalities
7
Benefits to a student
  • Quick access to course-related resources
  • Learning embedded into other browsing activities
  • Ability to link theoretical resources with the
    practical articles, documents, stories,
  • Science (but also art philosophy) is largely
    about relating things and seeing patterns
  • Universities re-use chunks of existing knowledge
    from third parties, and only create/provide
    their interpretation rather than replicating
    them
  • Rapid course update customization

8
Benefits to a student cont.
  • Exploratory guiding as a metaphor
  • What would my Prof say if he/she was watching
    over my shoulder when I read about IPCC climate
    scenarios?
  • Support for managing and sharing the semantic
    representations of browsing histories
  • A fellow student has followed a similar trail to
    the one you are following. Do you want to see
    the resources he/she has identified?
  • Automated creation of a semantic footprint in the
    selected ontology for visited pages (if the user
    allows)
  • High-level semantic filtering/querying
  • Yet-another gateway to the semantically
    relevant knowledge/information (via Magpie
    on-demand services)

9
Magpie KnowledgeWeb
  • Magpie brings in semantic web services
  • Modularization of interaction with learning units
  • Simple fast update of individual modules
  • Power users (not knowledge engineers) authoring
    and publishing new services for other
    users/customers
  • Service discovery composition
  • Potential for (almost) one-on-one customization
  • Early-stage Authors toolkit under construction

10
(No Transcript)
11
Issues for learning infrastructure
  • Good quality front-end content is important to
    make most of the back-end context
  • Semantic annotations of LUs can be re-used
  • We need to go beyond mere document metadata
  • Central portal vs. distributed knowledge with
    different degrees of trust, reliability or
    complexity
  • Portal is a comprehensive knowledge repository
  • yet a user must enter it to learn anything
  • Re-using and re-purposing existing content in a
    variety of contexts
  • Future is in knowledge (data) linking reasoning
    not in document storing retrieving (?)

12
Issues cont.
  • Learning seen as making connections
  • Discovering and/or creating learning narratives
  • Decoupling knowledge from authors/owners?
  • Semantic annotations dont replace people, but
    they may help bring right people together
  • Consider popularity of FOAF, MPG co.
  • KnowledgeWeb as repository vs. community
  • Best knowledge repository is that managed by a
    motivated community of users
  • We should probably address the issue of
    supporting sustainable communities of users
    practitioners
  • E.g. climateprediction.net community forum
    essentially superseded traditional FAQ, HowTo,
    User feedback,

13
Other frameworks to consider
  • What about semantics presence?
  • BuddySpace distributed client/server
    architecture, XML-based, using IM as foot in
    the door, relates semantic knowledge of browsing
    histories to the real people/colleagues/friends

14
BuddySpace
GoalWho else from my CoP did something
similar?
From semantically enriched web page towards
knowledge sharing by the communities of practice
interest
15
Other frameworks to consider
  • What about semantics presence?
  • BuddySpace using IM as foot in the door
  • Location is also interesting
  • BuddySpace scaleable dynamic maps, geographic
    positioning as a metaphor for conceptual maps
    (e.g. project-based, task-based,
    life-cycle-based,), one glance pattern
    recognition

16
60,000 users, 1,000,000 model-years, together
with a live forum we facilitate real buy-in
motivation
climateprediction.net Who else? in practice
17
Large-scale CPDN tacticstransplanted to a
UK-basedproject environment
Automatic Map Generation
Right-click to drill downinto cluster
nodes (provides scaleability)
18
Other frameworks to consider
  • What about semantics presence?
  • BuddySpace using IM as foot in the door
  • Location is also interesting
  • BuddySpace CPDN using geographic maps as a
    metaphor for conceptual maps
  • Peer-to-peer and face-to-face interaction
  • Hexagon, FlashMeeting co. lightweight yet GRID
    power tools for a quick F2F chat or a
    videoconference
  • Considering P2P facilities around Magpie, P2P
    data sharing (e.g. students climate models,
    visualizations)

19
Ubiquitous virtual presence env.
  • Goals
  • True multiparty
  • No need to install
  • GRID power

20
Other frameworks to consider
  • What about semantics presence?
  • BuddySpace using IM as foot in the door
  • Location is also interesting
  • BuddySpace CPDN using geographic maps as a
    metaphor for conceptual maps
  • Peer-to-peer and face-to-face interaction
  • Hexagon, FlashMeeting emerging P2P paradigm
  • Addition of these tools to KWeb EduPortal
  • might be offered to the users as an added
    value of their subscription or enrolment
  • might be a feature distinguishing us from others
  • could make portal truly ubiquitous

21
Thank you!
  • Magpie plug-in for IE and now also Mozilla
    downloadable from
  • http//kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/magpie
  • BuddySpace client downloadable from
  • http//www.buddyspace.org
  • M.Dzbor_at_open.ac.uk

22
(No Transcript)
23
ClimatePrediction.net
Double CO2 production
Control
1994
1994
24
ClimatePrediction.net
Double CO2 production
Control
2094
2094
25
Magpie IE Plugin
Web Browser Interface (incl. click management)
Trigger Services Interface (GUI-s)
u
a
c
Ontology visualizer/browser
Text highlighting (incl. on-demand services)
l
t
d
User preferences about actions
Recognized entities (hash)
r
e
l
1
Selected classes/branches
Entity recognition interface
q
g
s
1
Lexicon-based
Rule-based (eSpotter)
Ontology browsing, mapping module
f
h
h
j
i
Document Object Model
p
o
Ontology cache
Rules patterns
o
k
Hierarchical rep. suitable for simple reasoning
k
n
Edit, manage, extend/learn or customize the rules
RDF(S)/OWL parsers
m
Remote ontologies, KB-s services
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com