Capital Structure FIN 461: Financial Cases - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Capital Structure FIN 461: Financial Cases

Description:

... problem is knowing the debt beta. W. P. Carey School of Business ... Beta & Leverage ... If the beta of the debt is non-zero (i.e. ... Beta & Leverage: No ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: georgewg
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Capital Structure FIN 461: Financial Cases


1
Capital StructureFIN 461 Financial Cases
Modeling
  • George W. Gallinger
  • Associate Professor of Finance
  • W. P. Carey School of Business
  • Arizona State University

2
Managements Objective
  • Maximize firm's value
  • Firm value Market value of debt market value
    of equity
  • Firm's investments affect its value
  • Accept value enhancing projects.

3
Value Eroded Value Created
4
Long-Term Value Index
5
Valuation of No-Growth Unlevered Firm
6
Tax Benefit of Debt Financing
7
Valuation of a No-Growth Levered Firm

8
Competitive Environments
9
PV of Growth Opportunities
Can incorporate growth in the denominator of the
1st term
10
Contribution of PVGOs
11
Calculating the Cost of Debt
Alternatively, you could use the CAPM to estimate
the cost of debt. The problem is knowing the debt
beta.
12
Cost of Preferred Stock
13
Cost of Equity Using the Dividend Growth Model
14
Cost of Equity Using the SML
15
Cost of Equity from a Beta Perspective
16
Beta Leverage
Assumes the debt beta is 0.
  • In a world with corporate taxes and riskless
    debt, it can be shown that the relationship
    between the beta of the unlevered firm and the
    beta of levered equity is

17
Beta Leverage
  • If the beta of the debt is non-zero (i.e.,
    risky), then

18
Beta Leverage No Corporate Taxes
  • In a world without corporate taxes, and with
    riskless corporate debt, it can be shown that the
    relationship between the beta of the unlevered
    firm and the beta of levered equity is
  • In a world without corporate taxes, and with
    risky corporate debt, it can be shown that the
    relationship between the beta of the unlevered
    firm and the beta of levered equity is

19
Effect of Debt on Cost of Equity
20
Cost of Equity
21
Calculation of Weights WACC
22
Pertinent Info About Ethridge Company
23
Firm Value WACC
B
A
C
24
Firm Value WACC
A
B
C
25
Agency Costs Capital Structure
  • A trade-off of debt and equity agency costs
    suggests that some appropriate mix of debt and
    equity financing exists for minimizing total
    agency costs.

26
Costs of Financial Distress
  • Direct costs of bankruptcy (out-of-pocket cash
    expenses)
  • Legal, auditing and administrative costs (include
    court costs)
  • Large in absolute amount, but only 1-2 of large
    firm value
  • Indirect costs Usually much more important
  • Impaired ability to conduct business (e.g., lost
    sales)
  • Managerial distraction, loss of best (most
    mobile) personnel
  • Financial distress also gives managers adverse
    incentives
  • Asset substitution problem Incentive to take
    large risks
  • Under-investment problem S/Hs refuse to
    contribute funds
  • Trade-off Model of Corporate Capital Structure
  • Trade off tax benefits of debt vs costs of
    Financial distress


27
Agency Costs Of Outside Debt
  • Issuing debt externally helps minimize agency
    costs of equity
  • Gives rise to Agency Costs of Outside Debt
  • Costs increase with amount of debt issued
  • High debt loads give managers, acting for
    shareholders, incentives to play two perverse
    games
  • Expropriate bondholder wealth by paying excessive
    dividends
  • Bait And Switch Promise to use borrowed money
    for safe investment, then use to buy high/risk,
    high/return asset
  • Bondholders understand incentives, protect
    themselves with positive and negative covenants
    in lending contracts
  • Positive covenants mandate what borrower must do
  • Negative covenants mandate what borrower must not
    do
  • Agency costs of debt are burdensome, but so are
    solutions.

28
Game 1 The Asset Substitution Problem
  • When a firm falls into financial distress,
    management has incentive to substitute assets
  • Assume Firm Substitute has debt with a face value
    of 12,000,000 million outstanding, matures 1
    month
  • 10,000,000 of cash on hand
  • Firm still controls investment policy until
    default actually occurs
  • If firm defaults, bondholders take over all
    remaining assets (including cash on hand)
  • Substitutes managers offered two projects, both
    requiring 10,000,000 cash investment both
    paying off in 30 days
  • Safe promises a certain 10,200,000 payoff (2
    monthly return)
  • Lottery offers a 25 chance of 13,000,000
    payoff, and a 75 chance of 7,500,000 expected
    value 8,875,000.

29
Game 1 Asset Substitution Problem
  • Safe has positive NPV and is preferred by
    bondholders
  • But stockholders and managers rationally choose
    Lottery
  • If gamble is successful
  • Payoff 13,000,000 million
  • Pay maturing debt, keep remaining 1,000,000
  • If gamble unsuccessful
  • Stockholders are no worse off
  • Bondholders will take firms remaining assets in
    30 days
  • Game is important because shareholders (through
    managers) have incentive to gamble with
    bondholders money
  • Would not accept Lottery if all-equity financed
    firm
  • Would not accept Lottery if company was a
    partnership
  • Limited liability means bondholders have no
    recourse to shareholders.

30
Game 2 The Under-Investment Problem
  • Shareholders refuse to contribute funds for
    positive NPV projects
  • Occurs if shareholders must contribute cash, but
    all projects benefits accrue to bondholders.
  • Assume firm has 10,000,000 cash on hand and a
    bond worth 12,000,000 million maturing in 30
    days
  • Firm is offered chance to purchase a competitor
    at a discount price of 11,000,000 ? offer open
    only 30 days
  • Merger would maximize firm value, and bondholders
    would accept
  • Shareholders control firms investment policy
    until default occurs
  • Firms managers, acting for the shareholders,
    would reject merger
  • Even though value-maximizing, shareholders have
    to contribute additional 1,000,000 cash ? yet
    firm will still default in 30 days
  • If firm all-equity financed, shareholders would
    invest additional cash.

31
Theoretical Optimal Capital Structure
  • Optimal capital structure
  • Point where the value of the firm is maximized
  • WACC is minimized
  • Management trades off benefits realized from the
    interest tax shield against financial distress
    and agency costs.

32
Maximize Value of the Firm
33
(No Transcript)
34
Coverage Ratios
35
Median Value by Rating Category
36
Industry Debt-to-Asset Ratios
37
Market Value Debt Ratios, July 2002
38
Financial Relationships
  • Earnings before interest and taxes represent the
    operating income (before taxes) generated by the
    firm's assets
  • Interest expense is the (accounting) cost of debt
    financing
  • If you define ROA as net income/assets, you are
    mixing the earning power of the assets with a
    financing cost.

39
Trading on the Equity
40
EBIT-Profitability Analysis
  • When EBIT is below the level of 80, the firm
    will be more profitable if management finances
    with an all-equity capital structure
  • Above the indifference point, a combination of
    debt and equity financing improves
    profitability.

41
EBIT Indifference Levels for Different Capital
Structures
42
Indifference Levels
43
Choice Among Different Capital Structures
  • The capital structure choice is to use no debt if
    EBIT is below 90, use 300 of debt and 700 of
    equity financing if EBIT is in the range between
    90 to 104, and use 600 of debt and 400 of
    equity financing if EBIT is above 104.

44
Calculating Financial Leverage
45
Breakeven Sales Level
46
Managing Total Risk
47
The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com