VISION FOR WERRIBEE PLAINS STAGE II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

VISION FOR WERRIBEE PLAINS STAGE II

Description:

State Government initiative for region to be world renowned for sustainable ... Mid-term evaluation. Mid-term review of governance processes. Q. Why two consultancies? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: DNRE3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: VISION FOR WERRIBEE PLAINS STAGE II


1
VISION FOR WERRIBEE PLAINSSTAGE II
  • Case Study for Evaluation Workshop
  • 29th October, 2008

2
(No Transcript)
3
The Vision
  • State Government initiative for region to be
    world renowned for sustainable development based
    on
  • Sustainable agricultural development and
    high-value outputs,
  • Sustainable industrial and urban development
  • Sustainable management of the regions natural
    resources,
  • High level use of technologies, and
  • Strong and vibrant community

4
Stage 1
  • 10M Fund, plus
  • 20 activities whole of government
  • Period 2004-2008

5
Stage 1 Funded projects
6
Stage 2
  • DTF Investment Logic Map Benefit Management
    Plan
  • Consultations eg LGs, Water Authorities,
    Interest Gps
  • Evaluation of Stage 1
  • Review of Governance Processes Stage 1
  • Interim Steering Committee

7
Werribee Plains Vision 2007 Department of
Sustainability and Environment BENEFIT MANAGEMENT
PLAN
8
Benefit Weakness of Investment Logic Mapping
  • Benefits
  • Buy-in by senior stakeholders, including DTF (3 x
    2-hour workshops)
  • Concise summary of logic loved by senior
    government officials
  • Lot of effort goes into getting the logic right
  • Great tool for discussion with stakeholders
  • Weaknesses
  • Difficult to get commitment from senior managers
    for planning meetings.
  • Process oversimplifies project.
  • Lacks detail

9
Consultancies
  • Mid-term evaluation
  • Mid-term review of governance processes
  • Q. Why two consultancies?
  • A. Hard to get broad spectrum of skills across
    one firm
  • Difficulty keeping consultancies sufficiently
    discrete in scope, reporting and communication
    with key stakeholders.
  • Benefits different perspectives on the issues
  • Biggest surprise cost neutral with using one
    firm

10
Recommendations from Evaluation
  • Confirmed progress against project objectives
  • Validated concerns of project management team
    other stakeholders held similar concerns.
  • Highlighted weakness eg lack of community
    engagement
  • Informed planning on governance processes for
    Stage 2
  • Gave the project credibility with senior
    government officers and politicians
  • An important stakeholder engagement with around
    100 interviews.
  • Provided options for the project team to consider
    wrt governance and future evaluation.

11
DSE Supervision/project office
  • Project office at 621 Sneydes Rd., Werribee (with
    DPI staff)
  • Max Coster, Project Manager
  • Vivian Amenta, Project Officer
  • Box Hill staff
  • Murray McIntyre, Manager, Catchment Water
    Services
  • Communication community engagement specialists
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com