SUBPOENAS v. SEARCH WARRANTS: THE CURRENT STATE OF THE LAW - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

SUBPOENAS v. SEARCH WARRANTS: THE CURRENT STATE OF THE LAW

Description:

SUBPOENAS v. SEARCH WARRANTS: THE CURRENT STATE OF THE LAW ... O-O-J THREAT TO LAB WAS OUTRAGEOUS. PROPERTY RETURN PROPER. NO PC BEYOND FIRST 10 MLB PLAYERS ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: jhein
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SUBPOENAS v. SEARCH WARRANTS: THE CURRENT STATE OF THE LAW


1
SUBPOENAS v. SEARCH WARRANTSTHE CURRENT STATE
OF THE LAW
  • AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
  • WHITE COLLAR CRIME NATIONAL INSTITUTE
  • MIAMI, FLORIDA
  • MARCH 6, 2008
  • KURT STITCHER
  • LEVENFELD PEARLSTEIN, LLC

2
(No Transcript)
3
SUBPOENA ISSUES
  • NEGOTIATION/OBJECTION
  • MOTION TO QUASH Rule 17(c)
  • MAY BE ABLE TO LIMIT SCOPE
  • SEGREGATION
  • TECHNOLOGICAL
  • HUMAN REVIEW

4
SEARCH WARRANT ISSUES
  • OBJECTION
  • MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY Rule 41(g)
  • EX POST ONLY
  • SEGREGATION
  • SEIZURE/IMAGING BY GOVERNMENT
  • PROBLEM INTERMINGLED FILES

5
SUBPOENA KEYS
  • PRE-PRODUCTION NEGOTIATION
  • PRE-PRODUCTION OBJECTION
  • PRE-PRODUCTION SEGREGATION

6
SEARCH WARRANT KEYS
  • NO PRE-PRODUCTION NEGOTIATION
  • NO PRE-PRODUCTION OBJECTION
  • NO PRE-PRODUCTION SEGREGATION

7
IMPLICATIONS FOR CLIENTS
  • LIKE NIGHT AND DAY
  • SUBPOENA SOME CONTROL
  • SEARCH WARRANT NONE
  • MOST CRITICAL FOR PRIVILEGED/ PROTECTED
    INFORMATION

8
SEARCH WARRANT REQUIREMENTS
  • BASES
  • RULE 41
  • FOURTH AMENDMENT
  • REQUIREMENTS
  • PROBABLE CAUSE
  • PARTICULARITY

9
COMPLICATING FACTORS
  • PRACTICAL
  • VOLUME OF ESI
  • RELATIONAL DATA INTERMINGLING
  • LEGAL
  • NO METHODOLOGY REQUIREMENT
  • NO ON-SITE SEARCH REQUIREMENT

10
THE END RESULT
  • WHOLESALE ESI SEIZURES
  • HARDWARE OR IMAGING
  • STORAGE DEVICES
  • POST-SEIZURE SEARCHES
  • BROAD SWEEPING
  • PLAIN VIEW SEIZURES

11
THE FINAL INSULTRULE 41(g)
  • UNLAWFUL SEARCH/SEIZURE
  • MUST ESTABLISH 4TH AM. VIOLATION
  • G CAN KEEP UNDER 4TH AM. EXCEPTION (GOOD FAITH
    IMPEACHMENT INEVITABLE DISCOVERY PURGING OF THE
    TAINT)
  • LAWFUL SEARCH/SEIZURE
  • NEED EQUITABLE JURISDICTION
  • RETENTION MUST BE UNREASONABLE

12
THE BALCO DECISION
  • FEDERAL GJ INVESTIGATION
  • SUBPOENA TO MLB gt NO DOCS
  • SUBPOENAS TO 3RD PARTY LABS gt MTQ
  • SEARCH WARRANTS FOR LABS
  • RESISTANCE FAILS gt DIRECTORY IMAGED
  • ALL OF LABS SPORTS DRUG TESTING SEIZED
  • MORE SUBPOENAS WARRANTS
  • THIRD PARTIES UNAWARE/FAIL TO OBJECT
  • DIST. COURTS ORDER RETURN

13
(No Transcript)
14
THE MAJORITY OPINION
  • NO EQUITABLE JURISDICTION
  • NO CALLOUS DISREGARD FOR MLB RIGHTS
  • SUBPOENAS. AND WARRANTS OK
  • IMAGING DIRECTORY OK G DOES NOT HAVE TO RELY ON
    SEARCHED PARTY
  • NO BASIS FOR PROPERTY RETURN
  • G HAD PROVIDED COPIES TO LABS
  • G NEEDED ESI FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION
  • DID REQUIRE TAMURA COMPLIANCE

15
THE DISSENTING OPINION
  • CALLOUS DISREGARD gt EQUITY
  • G AVOIDED OBJECTION WITH 1-2 PUNCH
  • G REVIEWED ESI W/O NEUTRAL OBSERVER
  • O-O-J THREAT TO LAB WAS OUTRAGEOUS
  • PROPERTY RETURN PROPER
  • NO PC BEYOND FIRST 10 MLB PLAYERS
  • PLAIN VIEW NO GOOD FOR INTERMINGLED ESI
  • 3RD PARTIES PREJUDICED W/NO NOTICE

16
BALCOS BOTTOM LINE
  • NO ABILITY TO CHALLENGE
  • SEIZURE BEYOND PROBABLE CAUSE
  • SEIZURE OF PRIVILEGED/PROTECTED ESI
  • ALL ESI WARRANTS ARE GENERAL
  • 41(g) GUTTED
  • UNLAWFUL SEARCH UNLIKELY
  • COPIES TRUMP UNREASONABLE RETENTION
  • THIRD PARTIES SOL NO NOTICE
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com