Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Report of the Newfoundland and Labrador Commission on Our Place - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Report of the Newfoundland and Labrador Commission on Our Place

Description:

Returning to 1949: what were the expectations on joining Canada? ... Fisheries teetering on the brink. Rural communities in sharp decline. Severe out-migration ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: DBr772
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Report of the Newfoundland and Labrador Commission on Our Place


1
Between a Rock and a Hard PlaceThe Report of
the Newfoundland and Labrador Commission on Our
Place in Canada
  • Douglas Brown

2
Our Place in Canada
  • Royal Commission Mandate
  • Process
  • Framing of the Issues
  • Conclusions and Recommendations
  • Post-Commission developments

3
Royal Commission Mandate
  • Returning to 1949 what were the expectations on
    joining Canada?
  • Comprehensive examine all aspects of NL
    relations with Canada
  • Forward-looking how to renew and strengthen our
    place in Canada
  • Open-ended how to increase prosperity and
    self-reliance

4
Commission Proces
  • Appointed May 2002 reported July 2003
  • Three Commissioners Vic Young, Elizabeth Davis
    and James Igloliorte
  • Small staff
  • 25 public meetings, dozens of private ones
  • Research program of 30 studies
  • 15 months, budget of 2.3 million

5
Why a Commission
  • General malaise due to long-term effects of 1992
    cod moratorium, outmigration and federal budget
    cuts of 1995
  • Specific political rationale to give Grimes
    government a boost, find new ideas for
    intergovernmental strategy
  • Political risks creating a monster of raised
    expectations, no new solutions, too big a
    mandate, not enough time

6
Framing the Issues
  • Trying not to blame Canada
  • Facing hard truths
  • Embracing a sense of place
  • Seeking a new way of relating
  • Devising an integrated strategy

7
Hard truths
  • Economic disparitystill in last place
  • Fiscal crisisagain
  • Fisheries teetering on the brink
  • Rural communities in sharp decline
  • Severe out-migration
  • Weak constitutional position

8
Key conclusions and recommendations
  • No to separation, no to the status quo
  • Need for collaborative federalism
  • To be the principal beneficiary of offshore oil
    revenues
  • Concerted effort to restore the fisheries
  • A new partnership for hydro development
  • Putting the fiscal house in order
  • Facing up to rural sustainability

9
No to separation
  • Proud to be Canadian
  • Only 12 percent want independence
  • Huge level of dissatisfaction with how Canada
    works
  • Terms of Union cannot be amended

10
Collaborative Federalism
  • Need collaborative, not competitive federalism
  • Respect for NL as a province
  • More federal presence
  • More flexibility and accommodation to unique
    needs
  • Senate Reform
  • Council of the Federation

11
Offshore Oil
  • Atlantic Accord, negotiated by Mulroney-Peckford
    in 1985 NL was to be the principal beneficiary
    in fiscal terms
  • Initial fiscal projections of Accord unrealistic
  • Government of Canada reaps 75 to 80 percent of
    total revenues
  • Got to revisit the deal

12
(No Transcript)
13
Last Chance for the Fishery
  • Too much fed-prov squabbling
  • Need an action plan to address stock rebuilding,
    prevent foreign over-fishing, have joint
    management of licensing

14
Churchill River Hydro
  • Churchill Falls contract of 1969 with Hydro
    Quebec still costs NL an estimated 800 million a
    year in lost profits
  • But forget about linking new Lower Churchill
    project with renegotiated deal
  • Instead get other partners (e.g. Feds, Ontario)
    to promote an equitable new development

15
Provincial Fiscal Reform
  • Unsustainable fiscal deficit
  • Offshore oil revenues not going to close the gap
  • Need to balance the budget, engage in program
    review (i.e. cant do it all) and address pension
    liabilities

16
Rural Sustainability
  • Survival of rural Newfoundland is at stake
  • No one wants to discuss the issue
  • Commission failed to get consensus
  • Need for a sustained public dialogue or
    deliberation
  • There is a cross-Canada search for solutions

17
Impact of Commission
  • NL is here to stay in Canada
  • Confident sense of place something to build on
  • Greater sense of realism
  • Portrays gaps in cohesion as a community
  • Some blamed report as not bold enough
  • Provided a good foundation for a fresh approach

18
Developments since 20031
  • Williams government gets elected November 2003,
    program very similar to Commission report
  • Premiers agree to a new Council of Federation,
    December 2003
  • Paul Martin and Stephen Harper both promise a new
    deal on the offshore Martin government
    delivers, Feb. 2005

19
Since 2003
  • Budgetary position of province much improved
  • Oil-driven economy pushes NL into 6th or 7th
    place nationally
  • Rural out-migration continues
  • Williams takes aggressive line with feds over
    equalization, fishery and with business over oil,
    hydro and mines
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com