Title: The Rise of Private Tutoring in PostSocialist Eurasia
1The Rise of Private Tutoring in Post-Socialist
Eurasia
- Monitoring Initiative of the Network of Education
Policy Centers - (supported by OSI)
2NETWORK OF EDUCATION POLICY CENTERS
- Mapped, supported and act in partnership with
Open Society Institute Education Support Program - 22 countries, 26 centers from CEE, SEE, CA,
Caucasus, CIS
3MISSION OF POLICY CENTERS
- Emerged in the region in last couple of years
addressing the need for - Independent voice in maturing democracies and
open societies - Advocacy for equal opportunities in education,
accountability, transparent and sustainable
policy decisions - Promotion of participatory policy processes
- Coupling research and policy practice
4COMMON FEATURES OF EPCS
- Strong local knowledge
- International contacts
- Links with key multinational organizations
- Diverse in nature, organizational structure,
professional background, scope, size, and role in
educational change - Find more about NEPC on the web
http//epc.objectis.net
5EPC EDUCATION MONITORING INITIATIVES
- Monitoring Private Tutoring
- Monitoring Drop-outs
6MONITORING OF PRIVATE TUTORING
- Key words equity, transparency, and corruption
- Raising the issue reasons, scope, cost, ethics
- Policy recommendations
- Advocacy and follow-up
7APPROACH
- Focus on local expertise vs. foreign experts
- Supporting local think-tanks policy NGOs as new
actors in policy processes - Local capacity development
- How to design policy research
- How to write policy papers
- Advocacy skills
8PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES
- Eastern Europe (Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania)
- South East Europe (BH, Croatia)
- Caucasus (Azerbaijan, Georgia)
- Ukraine
9DEFINITION
- Private tutoring (PT) refers to the tutoring in
an academic subject which is provided by tutors
for financial gain and which is additional to the
provision by mainstream schooling (Bray, 1999)
10RESEARCH GOALS
- The scope of PT in the last phase of secondary
education - The context of PT (legal basis, policy decisions
and educational environment) - Impacts of the PT on equity, equal opportunities,
and access issues in education - PT related problems/issues
- Corruption and educational ethics
- Shadow education (hidden costs of public
education)
11METHODOLOGY
- Theoretical and descriptive analysis of the
phenomenon of private tutoring and its
educational, socio-economical implications - National case studies (qualitative)
- Quantitative survey of 1st year students at
universities (population A) - 8000 students (8 countries)
- Quantitative survey of secondary school students
(population B) - 2000 students (4 countries)
12CONTEXT The reasons for the rise of PT
- Declining education quality (compensation to
failing education provision) - Economic factors (low teacher salaries)
- Changing examination systems
- Centralized school leaving (Slovakia, Croatia)
- Centralized university admission (Azerbaijan)
- School leaving/university entrance exams
(Lithuania, Poland) - PT as profit making business
- Changing perceptions of PT (prestige, education
value)
13DIFFERENT FORMS OF PT
- One-on-one private tutoring offered by
individuals - Preparatory courses offered by insitutions
14PRELIMINARY FINDINGS SCOPE
- PT Preparatory courses
- Azerbaijan 92 6
- Lithuania 75
- Georgia 66 3
- Poland 50 48
- Ukraine 68 38
- Croatia 35 42
- BH
- Slovakia
15PRIVATE TUTORING IN AZERBAIJANElmina
KazimzadeCIES ConferenceStanford, CAMarch
22-26, 2005
16KEY REASONS FOR PRIVATE TUTORING
- New, centralized university entrance testing
- introduced as anti-corruption measure in higher
education during in the beginning of 1990s - Gap between school curriculum and university
entrance testing requirements - High demand for higher education degrees as a
guarantee for better employment
17SCOPE OF PRIVATE TUTORING
18SCHOOL CURRICULUM UNIVERSITY ENTRANCE EXAMS
- Was school preparation was sufficient to
successfully pass university entrance exams? - Absolutely yes 8
- Probably yes 16
- Dont know 10
- Probably no 29
- Definitely no 36
19PT INFLUENCE ON SUCCESSFULLY PASSING UNIVERSITY
ENTRANCE EXAMS
- How did PT influence the results of your
university entrance exams? - Absolutely helped 76
- Partially helped 22
- Did not help at all 1
- Cannot answer 2
20Private Tutoring in Poland
- Elzbieta Putkiewicz
- Institute of Public Affairs
- Warsaw University
21RESPONDENTS OPINIONS ABOUT PT Four ways of
perceiving private instruction selected (cluster
analysis)
- as a source of additional income for teachers
the cluster is created by the following survey
questions 3, 4, 5, 6, 13 and 14 - as a factor increasing the price of education,
the cluster is created by the following survey
questions 1, 12, 20, 22, 25 and 26 - as a way of preparing for university entrance
exams, the cluster is created by the following
survey questions 2, 15, 16, 23, 24 and 28 - as a way of compensating for school
shortcomings, the cluster is created by the
following survey questions 9, 10, 11, 18, 19 and
21.
22 Location of a secondary school vs. opinions on
PT (Average standardized indices exes and ANOVA
results)
23Familys financial standing vs. opinions
concerning PT (Average standardised indices and
ANOVA results)
24Pearsons correlations between parents education
indices vs. aspects dimensions of opinions about
PT
plt0.05, plt0.01
25Taking and not taking PT vs. opinions concerning
them (Average standardised indexes and ANOVA
results)
26MONITORING PRIVATE TUTORING IN GEORGIAAnna
MatiashviliNino KutateladzeInternational
Institute for Education Policy, Planning
Management (EPPM)CIES ConferenceStanford,
CAMarch 22-26, 2005
27CONTEXT OF PRIVATE TUTORING IN GEORGIA
- Key Reasons for Private Tutoring
- Competitive University Entrance Exams
- Poor Quality of Mainstream Schooling
- Economic Circumstances of Mainstream Teachers
28SCOPE OF PRIVATE TUTORING
29 30PT DISTRIBUTION ACCORDING TO FAMILY SOCIAL STATUS
31REASONS FOR PT
32IMPACT OF PT ON ENTRANCE EXAMS
33STUDENTS ATTITUDES TOWARDS PT