PRESENTATION ON CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAWPORTFOLIO COMMITTEE FOR DCS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

PRESENTATION ON CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAWPORTFOLIO COMMITTEE FOR DCS

Description:

The Bill proposes important changes to the manner in which children in conflict ... brought before the court, the court may authorise the extension of the period ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Kedib
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PRESENTATION ON CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAWPORTFOLIO COMMITTEE FOR DCS


1
PRESENTATION ON CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE
LAW-PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE FOR DCS
  • 10 JUNE 2008

2
INTRODUCTION
  • The Child Justice Bill (CJB)
  • The Bill proposes important changes to the manner
    in which children in conflict with the law are
    managed and dealt with within the criminal
    justice system.
  • Since the conceptualization of the Bill the
    Department of Social Development has strived to
    align all its initiatives on children in conflict
    with the law to the requirements of the Bill.
  • The Department of Social Development is therefore
    responsible for the execution of the following
    functions stipulated by various legislation
    including the CJB.
  • Provision of assessments for all arrested
    children by probation officers -within 48hrs
  • Provision and funding of diversion services
  • Provision of alternatives for children awaiting
    trial
  • Home based supervision programmes
  • Provision of residential care facilities (Secure
    Care Facilities)
  • Provision of pre-trial and pre-sentence reports
  • Alternative sentencing options
  • Prevention services and programmes to strengthen
    existing capacity and opportunities for children
  • Early intervention services to prevent children
    entering into the Criminal Justice System

3
SUPPORTING LEGISLATION
  • The Department renders services to children in
    conflict with the law based on legislative
    mandates such as the following
  • Probation Services Amendment Act,2002
  • Section 4B states that any arrested child who has
    not been released shall be assessed by a
    probation officer as soon as reasonably possible,
    but before his or her first appearance in court
    in terms of section 50( l) (c) of the Criminal
    Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977)
    Provided that if the child has not yet been
    assessed when brought before the court, the court
    may authorise the extension of the period within
    which the assessment must take place by periods
    not exceeding seven days at a time following his
    or her first court appearance.
  • Section 4A refers to appointment of assistant
    probation officers and their duties
  • Childrens Act 38 of 2005 and the Amendment Act
    41 of 2007
  • Chapter 8(s) 143 (sub section 1) a-b provision
    of prevention programme
  • (sub section 2) a-b
    early intervention programmes
  • Chapter 13 refers to establishment of
    Residential Care Facilities and programmes.

4
MEASURES PUT IN PLACE TO ENSURE THAT THE CONTACT
OF CHILD OFFENDERS WITH CRIMINAL JUSTICE IS
LIMITED
  • Assessment of arrested children is conducted by
    Probation officers in courts, RAR and in DSD
    offices
  • Implementation of diversion programmes
  • Contact details are provided to all SAPS stations
  • Visit to SAPS holding facilities
  • Re-assessment of children detained in DCS
    facilities for alternative placement (14 day
    remand)
  • Utilization of the Home-based Supervision
  • Turn around strategy of childrens cases (Case
    flow management)
  • Provision of secure care facilities
  • Plans for building additional secure care
    facilities.
  • Advocacy programs- Preventative programs in
    collaboration with other stakeholders.
  • Participating on the awaiting trial detainees
    task team led by DCS toe reduce number of
    children in DCS facilities
  • Capacity building of Probation services.

5
MEASURES PUT IN PLACE TO ENSURE THAT THE CONTACT
OF CHILD OFFENDERS WITH CRIMINAL JUSTICE IS
LIMITED CONT
  • HUMAN RESOURCES
  • Probation officers
  • The Department has approximately 479 probation
    officers who are currently servicing 388
    magisterial courts, 88 high courts and 299
    periodical courts.
  • Assistant Probation officers
  • A volunteer assistant probation officer'
    programme has been initiated in collaboration
    with Umsobomvu Youth Fund and the National Youth
    Service Programme to recruit and train 220 young
    people as Volunteer Assistant Probation Officers.
  • Presently 296 APOs have been appointed to
    provide services to children in conflict with the
    law, of which 141 are youth from the VAPO project
    .
  • These young people are assisting probation
    officers in providing services to children in
    conflict with the law, especially with regard to
    the implementation of home-based supervision and
    family finding.

6
SECURE CARE CAPACITY(23/05/2008)
7
NUMBER OF PERSONNEL PER PROVINCE
8
MEASURES PUT IN PLACE TO ENSURE THAT THE CONTACT
OF CHILD OFFENDERS WITH CRIMINAL JUSTICE IS
LIMITED CONT.
  • SECURE CARE FACILITIES
  • The department has 31 secure facilities and
    planned to build additional 22 facilities within
    the MTEF
  • Out of the 31 facilities nine are outsourced to
    NGOs and 22 run by the department
  • On average 1500 to 1800 new children are admitted
    at these facilities on monthly basis to await
    trial.
  • In total the facilities have 2262 bed capacity
    and at a given time there is approximately bed
    space of 500.
  • For instance as of the 23rd May 2008, 677 bed
    space was available
  • These facilities are always not fully utilized.
  • The planned facilities will provide additional
    bed space of 1320

9
Number of Secure Care Facilities
10
Number of Secure Care Facilities
11
Number of Secure Care Facilities
12
Number of Secure Care Facilities
13
Number of Secure Care Facilities
14
Number of Secure Care Facilities
15
CHALLENGES EXPERIENCED BY DSD IN ACCOMODATING
CHILDREN IN DSD FACILITIES THAN IN DCS FACILITIES
  • Non compliance with the Interim National
    Protocol for the management of children awaiting
    trial.
  • The majority of arrested children are usually
    assessed in courts and in correctional
    facilities, of which they could have been
    assessed before appearing in court and ultimately
    being detained in DCS facilities.
  • The Criminal Procedure Act (sec 50 (sub sec 5)
    mandates SAPS to notify Probation officers of all
    arrested children for assessment purposes and
    placement.

16
CHALLENGES EXPERIENCED BY DSD IN
ACCOMODATINGCHILDREN IN DSD FACILITIES THAN IN
DCS FACILITIES
  • The Interim National Protocol for the management
    of children awaiting trial further states that
    Justice and Constitutional Development has a
    responsibility to notifying the Probation
    officer of an arrested child due to appear before
    court and has not been assessed.
  • Children are placed within DCS facilities through
    court order.
  • The court considers the seriousness of the
    offence and not always the recommendations of the
    Probation Officers when placing a child and/or
    considering alternative placement and diversion.

17
LEVEL OF SOCIAL WORK SUPPORT
  • DSD has dedicated personnel as required by the
    Probation Services Act (116 of 1991) as amended
    in 2002 to render services to children at risk
    and in conflict with the law
  • Prevention programmes
  • Early intervention services (reception,
    assessment and referral services, restorative
    justice programmes and diversion programmes).
  • Services to victims of crime
  • Statutory services
  • Continuum of care (supervision and after care)
  • Diversion
  • Approximately 19 631 children have been diverted
    during the last financial year. However a more
    concerted effort is required to strengthen
    programmes and fund NGOs who are providing
    these programmes as children are committing more
    violent crimes and sexual related offences.

18
CONCLUSION
  • The Department acknowledges the intersectoral
    collaboration
  • However if DSD is not informed of children
    arrested by SAPS, such children wont be assessed
    within 48 hours of arrest and they might end up
    in correctional facilities.
  • If children are not assessed on arrest or within
    48 hours of arrest, NPA should not proceed with
    the case without an assessment report.
  • Lastly if all role players do not assume their
    responsibilities it impacts negatively on the way
    children are dealt with and some children fall
    through the cracks within the child justice
    system.

19
  • THANK YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com