Building psychological critical thinkers from day one - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Building psychological critical thinkers from day one

Description:

Explore (briefly) some aspects of literature in critical thinking ... Nothing in education is so astonishing as the amount of ignorance it accumulates ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: janeha9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Building psychological critical thinkers from day one


1
Building psychologicalcritical thinkersfrom day
one
  • Jane S. Halonen
  • University of West Florida

2
Objectives
  • Explore (briefly) some aspects of
    literature in critical thinking
  • Examine novice-to-expert progression as a
    psychological thinker
  • Share teaching strategies that facilitate optimal
    development (emphasis on
    first course)

3
This Sceptered Isle, A. Millar
  • Education appears to have sunk to an
    all-time low. Discipline is lax or nonexistent,
    exams have been made easier over time to
    compensate for falling standards, and
    constant testing and the dumbing down
    of the curriculum has eroded the
    enthusiasm of pupils.

  • 6-13-2008

4
Growth of CT in UK
  • A level tests show sharp increase in students
    taking CT version
  • Traditionalists criticize skills emphasis as
    dismissive of content
  • In contrast, concentrating on skills that
    transfer
  • Makes content as context for the skill
  • Produces more enduring learning
  • Facilitates greater employability

5
  • Nothing in education is so astonishing as the
    amount of ignorance it accumulates in the form of
    inert facts.
  • Henry Adams (1938-1918)
  • American historian, author

6
Origins of this accidental critical thinking
scholar
  • Prototypical psych major (i.e.,
    Why do I have to take research and statistics?)
  • New hire at Alverno College
  • Research collaborator ?
  • What does it mean to teach
    critical thinking in psychology?
    1983 - 1986

7
Why study psychology?
  • So you wont be a jerk.

8
Primary conclusions
  • CT is best thought of as a state, not a
    trait.
  • CT features are context-specific disciplinary
    and developmental.
  • Engaging students to think critically is most
    effective through disequilibrium.
  • Faculty struggle to surrender role of stage on
    sage.

9
The briefcase model
10
Restoring equilibrium
11
External event varies
  • In the beginning, a whopper!
  • For example SAGGING
  • The lower the pants,
  • The lower the IQ
  • As students progress from
    novice to expert, they can
    handle nuance and subtlety.

12
Fast forward to 2003
  • A rubric for learning, teaching, and assessing
    scientific inquiry in psychology
  • Halonen, Bosack, Clay, McCarthy
  • Teaching of Psychology, 30,
  • pp. 196-208
  • SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY CRITICAL THINKING

13
What are the relevant domains of CT in
psychology?
  • Descriptive skills
  • Conceptualization skills
  • Problem-solving skills
  • Ethical reasoning
  • Practice of scientific values
  • Communication skills
  • Collaboration skills
  • Self-assessment practice

14
Description skills Unpacking a sample domain
  • Observation
  • Measurement
  • Interpretation
  • How do novices differ from experts?
  • (a little audience participation would be
    nice.)

15
Observation
  • Before training Observes behavior superficially
    and recklessly
  • Basic (novice) Observes general patterns but
    confuses observation and interpretation
  • Developing Distinguishes observation from
    interpretation
  • Advanced (expert) Makes subtle, sensitive
    observations
  • Professional (graduate) Sophisticated techniques
    appropriate to circumstance

16
Measurement
  • Before training Uses measurement imprecisely and
    in limited ways
  • Basic (novice) Needs direction to rely on
    measurement but resists precision
  • Developing Uses measurement purposefully as
    empirical strategy, complying with precision
    demand
  • Advanced (expert) Actively pursues appropriate
    instrumentation, reasoned measurement strategies
  • Professional (graduate) Strives to produce
    optimal measurement strategy to reduce challenges
    to validity of conclusions

17
Interpretation
  • Before training Relies on intuition to produce
    obvious, simplistic conclusions
  • Basic (novice) Forms judgment with limited
    regard to quality of evidence
  • Developing Selectively combines data-based
    interpretation with personal experience
  • Advanced (expert) Relies on data for
    systematically for more complex interpretation
  • Professional (graduate) Interprets behavior at
    appropriate level of complexity, reflecting
    context

18
How would this approach be reflected in
psychology programs?
  • Programs that emphasize coherent,
    developmental focus
  • Course structures that include and promote CT
    student learning outcomes
  • Faculty who give up covering the content in
    service to cognitive goals

19
Retention curves (Ericksen, 1983)
20
Examples from introductory psychology
  • The data page
  • Two truths and a tale
  • Quack like a duck
  • Think and do homework
  • The best exam ever
  • Whats wrong with Emily?

21
The data page
  • What information will help you
  • Personalize the class?
  • Learn student names faster?
  • Contact students when necessary?
  • Teach statistics more effectively?

22
Two truths and a tale UK style
  • I have spent many hours on a Norton motorcycle.
  • I have been kissed by a member of Monty Python.
  • I cannot enjoy clotted cream due to
    lactose intolerance.
  • Votes reveal hypothesis skills, overconfidence,
    description skills.

23
Quack like a duck (Hunter, 82)
  • Clear your desks.
  • Write with a pencil. Preferably 2.
  • Take off your watch.
  • Put your shoes under the seat.
  • If youve written poetry in last week,
    put your head down.
  • If youre Scottish, go to the back of the room
    and face the wall..
  • Put two fingers up your nose and quack
    like a duck.

24
Think and do page
  • Each class requires a prep page.
  • Questions based on reading
  • Activities or puzzles related to material
  • Could be an outline
  • Graded on good faith effort for prep.
  • Each prep counts for specific percent of grade.

25
The best exam ever
  • Now that you have studied the brain, perception,
    sensation, etc., how do you manage to perform
    your preferred leisure activity?

26
(No Transcript)
27
Rubric
  • Shows reasonable depth of explanation
  • Addresses all questions asked
  • Relies on psychological concepts rather than
    personal opinion
  • Demonstrates creativity
  • Applies psychology concepts accurately to chosen
    activity
  • Accurately self-assesses

28
Whats Wrong with Emily?
  • Class interviews faux famous client (class
    graduate as Emily Dickinson).
  • Final exam involves description skills,
    conceptualization, questioning, collaboration,
    etc.
  • Outcomes
  • Disagreement on diagnosis and treatment
    (just like in professional life)
  • Demonstration that clinical work not as easy
    as it looks on television
  • Students ask, Is it okay if we do more
    research?

29
(No Transcript)
30
Rubric
  • Describes behavior accurately and distinguishes
    from inference
  • Answers all parts of exam
  • Applies concepts (e.g., mental status) accurately
  • Justifies conclusions
  • Accurately self-assesses

31
Key Success Elements
  • Reward preparation
  • Share air time
  • Clarify performance expectation--gt write GREAT
    rubrics
  • Require student self-assessment
  • Pursue perfection
    (or at least improvement)

32
What American Psychological Association resources
support critical thinking focus?
  • National standards for introductory psychology
  • Guidelines/goals/outcomes for undergraduate
    programs
  • Core competences for scientifically-minded
    clinicians
  • Community college task force work
  • Puget Sound conference

33
Selected References
  • Barr, R.B., Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to
    learning A new paradigm for undergraduate
    education. Change, 27, 6, 12-25.
  • Dunn, D.S., Mehrotra, C.M., Halonen, J.S.
    (2004). Measuring up Educational assessment
    challenges and practices for psychology.
    Washington, DC American Psychological
    Association.
  • Ericksen, S.C. (1983). Private measures of good
    teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 10, 133-136.
  • Hunter, W.J. (1982). Obedience to authority.
    Activities resource handbook for psychology.
    Washington, DC American Psychological
    Association.
  • Mentkowski, M., Rogers, G., Doherty, A., Loacker,
    G., Hart, J.R., Richards, W. et al. (2000).
    Learning that lasts Integrating learning,
    development, and performance in college and
    beyond. San Francisco Jossey-Bass.

34
How does it feel to be a novice?
35
For follow-up
  • jhalonen_at_uwf.edu
  • I welcome conversations about teaching as a
    respite from DeanLand

36
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com