Title: A research framework to shed light on the character of the EUs social constituency, as it emerges in
1A research framework to shed light on the
character of the EUs social constituency, as it
emerges in dynamic interaction with the process
of polity formation. Social constituency The
structure of demands and expectations that
citizens and groups place on the EU.Recognition
order A framework within which individuals and
groups are learning to see themselves as
recognised with respect to certain
characteristics.
2Organisation is the sum of
3Steps of identification
- Catness, the nature and extent of relevant
categories such as gender, sexuality, ethnicity,
race, nation, age, region, religion, province,
and class. - Netness the nature and extent of networks within
which people involve themselves. A network is
made up of people with some kind of an
interpersonal bond weak or strong. Networks are
often formed around categories, or the latter are
embedded in specific networks. - Assessing catness and netness, in order to get a
sense of their organisational status. This
includes an assessment of the degree of
inclusiveness and exclusiveness of each catnet,
as well as an assessment of their organisational
status, such as the resources they command, as
well as how they are structured.
4A further indicator of netness is the group or
organisations mobilising potential
- in response to an outside threat to a groups
identity or sense of self (defensive) - to capitalise on opportunities that have arisen
(offensive) - to preparatory mobilisation, where a group pools
resources in anticipation of future opportunities
and threats (Tilly 1978 74).
5The two-dimensional catnet grid
6d) to sort out which catnets, from the whole
range of possible ones that would be the most
important for us to establish the relevant
claimants
- We can start from any one of the following
angles - Identify all those groups that are directly
involved in the generation, maintenance and also
rectification of the basic conditions that ensure
self-confidence in any given society - Identify the type and range of rights that are
available to citizens in a society with the aim
of sorting out those groups that are particularly
involved in ensuring the conditions that underpin
self-respect - Identify those groups most closely associated
with the hegemonic values in any given society
and then look at all those dependent on the
hegemons so as to establish the conditions that
underpin self-esteem - Supplemental investigations, such as for instance
to obtain information on the prison population,
on the presumption that disadvantaged groups tend
to be more frequently incarcerated are there
particular groups that dominate here?
7- e) to clarify the reasons that groups give to
seek recognition - look for the explanations that groups give to
account for why they are concerned with
recognition, and try to ascertain which mode of
recognition they are most concerned with - interview members of the groups
- study the information they produce, the
interventions they make, the claims they set
forth, and how they are addressed by other groups
and by public authorities.
8- f) to sort groups by explicit reference to the
notion of denial of recognition. - focuses explicitly on those groups that
subjectively see themselves as in need of
recognition, and who will also be able and prone
to refer to experiences of denial of recognition
or who refer to some form of denigration or
insult.
9- g) establish how and the extent to which those
actors that can be categorised under the label of
recognition approach the EU. - Four possible ways in which claims and claimants
may relate to the EU can be identified - they focus exclusively on the EU as the addressee
for claims - the EU is seen as supplemental, meaning that
there is an equal focus on the EU and on another
entity, such as an organisations home state - the EU is a subsidiary addressee, meaning that
there is another addressee that matters more to
the groups or the organisations - the relevant claim-seekers do not focus on the EU
at all
103 LEITBILDER OF THE EU
The EU as a trans-national entity
- Very weak or non-existent supranational
decision-making and sanctioning ability, at least
in non-market matters. - Significant formal and informal constraints on
supranational institution-building. - A very limited scope for redistribution and
foreign and security policy confined to the
member states. - A weak and highly constrained fiscal and taxing
ability, based on member state contributions. - A limited scope and range of regulatory measures
beyond the operation of the Common Market. - Problem-solving through transnational functional
regimes on the basis of delegated authority. - Legitimation ensured through democratic
will-formation at the nation state level with
the requisite democratic control of regulatory
functions above the state level ensured by
openness and deliberation in transnational
governance structures.
11The EU as a state-in-the-making
- A commitment to a constitutional patriotism
founded on basic rights and democratic
procedures, which also ensures that citizens are
considered as and consider themselves as citizens
of the same order. - The basic structural and substantive
constitutional principles of Union law will be
firmly entrenched. - Coercive measures and the resources required for
efficient and consistent norm enforcement and
policy implementation. - Schooling, symbolic measures and social
redistributive means to socialize the people of
Europe into Europeans. - A set of clearly delineated criteria for who are
Europeans and who are not, and these criteria
reflect cultural aspects and the search for a
common identity. - A wide scope of regulatory and redistributive
measures, and an independent and significant
fiscal capacity and taxing ability (taxes paid
directly to the Union). - A European foreign and security policy, police
and military force for territorial control and
protection of sovereignty, and international
legal recognition as a state.
12The EU as an emergingcosmopolitan government
- The active development of a European
constitutional structure with a firmly entrenched
rights basis which includes civil, political,
social and economic rights. - A post-national organization that subjects its
actions to higher-ranking principles. - The borders of the Union are justified with
regard to what is required for the Union to be a
self-sustainable and well-functioning democratic
entity and with regard to the support and further
development of similar regional associations in
the rest of the world. - A commitment to a set of universal norms founded
on fundamental rights and democratic procedures. - A delineation of powers and responsibilities
along horizontal and vertical lines. - A very open and comprehensive, multi-level
process of democratic will-formation that places
great onus on participation conducive to
deliberative democratic supranationalism. - The Union is not aspiring to be a world power but
a regional political order that pushes for and
binds itself to cosmopolitan principles.