An introduction to Proteins, Protein Folding and the Lattice Model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

An introduction to Proteins, Protein Folding and the Lattice Model

Description:

Linear polymers of amino acids linked by peptide bonds in a specific sequence. Large molecules, consisting of some permutation ... So what is a lattice anyways? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:607
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: csurs1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An introduction to Proteins, Protein Folding and the Lattice Model


1
(An introduction to)Proteins, Protein Folding
and the Lattice Model
  • Casey Lengacher
  • University of Kentucky, CSURS Group

2
Introduction
  • What are proteins?
  • Linear polymers of amino acids linked by peptide
    bonds in a specific sequence
  • Large molecules, consisting of some permutation
    of different amino acids
  • Acids are linked together via covalent chemical
    bonds called peptide bonds
  • These links are grouped together to form
    polypeptide chains

3
Classifications
  • Type of polypeptide structure
  • Monomeric versus Oligomeric
  • Chemical composition
  • Simple versus Conjugate
  • Biological function
  • Catalyst enzymes for chemical reactions
  • Structure keratin, collagen, elastin
  • Transport hemoglobin
  • Many others

4
Structures
  • Function is closely related to shape
  • Aspects of structure divided into levels
  • Primary the sequence of the amino acid
  • Secondary linear helix or zigzag pattern
  • Tertiary three-dimensional folded structure
  • Quaternary multiple chains behaving as one
  • The precise structure, or functional structure,
    is called the native state or lowest energy
    state
  • Modified structures result in a denatured protein

5
Synthesis
6
Problems
  • Modern science has established, working models
    for primary structures but still struggles with
    predicting tertiary structures.
  • Developing a strong model for tertiary structure
    predictions is important because the tertiary
    structure most reflects a proteins function.

7
Historical Perspective
  • 1838 Jons J. Berzelius
  • The existence of biological materials different
    from lipids, polysaccharides, and nucleic acid
  • 1953 Crick and Watson
  • The structure of deoxyribonucleic acid
  • 1954 Christian Anfinsen
  • Proves theoretically the primary sequence
    contains enough information to determine tertiary
    structure

8
Turning Point
  • Anfinsens work was very significant.
  • While proof was valid, techniques were limited
  • Lacked an algorithm, forced most computations
  • Spent a great deal of time after 1954 developing
    rules for protein folding related to
    thermodynamics and molecular interaction
  • Assistance would come 15 years later in the form
    of a paradox

9
Levinthals Paradox
  • 1968-1969 Cyrus Levinthal
  • Suggested that folding mechanism was not a random
    sampling
  • The operation must be fast
  • To explain this, there must exist non-native
    permutations sitting in local deep wells of low
    energy, but not the global low energy
  • Algorithms based on relaxation techniques may be
    able to verify these results

10
Model Evolution
  • Several models begin to develop
  • Framework Model elements form independently in
    the secondary structure, then collide to form the
    tertiary structure
  • Nucleation Model spontaneous formation of bits
    of the secondary structure, which then act as
    nuclei from which further structure builds
  • Hydrophobic Collapse Model protein collapses to
    hide its hydrophobic side chains, and then
    rearranges to its final tertiary structure

11
Models for Models
  • Lattices can be used to reduce complexity
  • Several different kinds, but most work on the
    principle of reducing an near infinite set of
    outcomes to a more realistic number.
  • Typical lattice model construction
  • A single self-avoiding string (SAP) representing
    the polypeptide chain
  • Beads placed at the nodes can represent the
    constraining entities
  • Intuitively, the best SAP would be the one that
    represents the lowest energy level, but is it
    really that simple?

12
Lattices
  • So what is a lattice anyways?
  • Grid based model, that can be multi-dimensional,
    typically consisting of nodes connected by
    relationships in a structured pattern
  • The nodes and connections can be objects and
    relationships that have some real world
    application
  • Understanding the application is vital to picking
    a node arrangement that will work

13
HP Lattice Model
  • An example of the lattice model applied to the
    Hydrophobic Collapse Model
  • One method to evaluating the optimal SAP is by
    analysis if the Unconnected Neighboring Nodes
    (UNN)
  • In a simple two-type HP model, 4 UNN combinations
    are possible HP, HH, PP, and PH.
  • Each combination is given a weight, typically
    based on the hydrophobic count.
  • The SAP with the lowest score is indicated as the
    most likely candidate.

14
HP Lattice Model
15
Problems
  • The lattice model approach does have problems.
  • The biggest problem is that in a square model,
    pairing becomes an issue
  • Pairing in a square model eliminates interaction
    between acids that are not in an even odd
    pairing
  • To overcome this, some have suggested using a
    triangular lattice model

16
Algorithm Analysis
  • Read in a source for the shapes
  • Apply the sequence to each shape, determining the
    energy level
  • Output can be in graphical form or tabular
  • Algorithm can become more complex if less is
    known about the input sequences

17
Future Ideas
  • Is there room for additional improvements?
  • Could the lattice model be made to model the real
    world more accurately?
  • So far, most research involves variations in node
    arrangement.
  • Could relationships along the SAP be weighted?
  • Could a weighted approach eliminate the pairing
    problem in the square conformation?

18
Thanks
  • Dr. Jaromczyk
  • CSURS Group
  • University of Kentucky
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com