Recent activities on building a production Grid in the Asia Pacific Region - PRAGMA routine-basis experiments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Recent activities on building a production Grid in the Asia Pacific Region - PRAGMA routine-basis experiments

Description:

Periodic, monthly, distribution of all trust anchors. Common for the entire IGTF. Includes all trust anchors for all profiles. classic, SLCS, experimental ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:128
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: yos44
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Recent activities on building a production Grid in the Asia Pacific Region - PRAGMA routine-basis experiments


1
Recent activities on building a production Grid
in the Asia Pacific Region- PRAGMA routine-basis
experiments - APGrid PMA and the IGTF -
  • Yoshio Tanaka (yoshio.tanaka_at_aist.go.jp)
  • APGrid PMA, Chair
  • PRAGMA
  • Grid Technology Research Center, AIST, Japan

2
PRAGMA routine-basis experimentsAll slides in
this part are by courtesy ofMason Katz and Cindy
Zheng (SDSC/PRAGMA)
3
PRAGMA Grid Testbed
UZurich, Switzerland
NCSA, USA
KISTI, Korea
CNIC, China
UMC, USA
AIST, Japan
GUCAS, China
SDSC, USA
TITECH, Japan
UoHyd, India
NCHC, Taiwan
CICESE, Mexico
KU, Thailand
ASCC, Taiwan
UNAM, Mexico
USM, Malaysia
BII, Singapore
MU, Australia
UChile, Chile
http//pragma-goc.rocksclusters.org
4
Application vs. Infrastructure Middleware
5
PRAGMA Grid resources http//pragma-goc.rocksclus
ters.org/pragma-doc/resources.html
6
Why Routine-basis Experiments?
  • Resources group Missions and goals
  • Improve interoperability of Grid middleware
  • Improve usability and productivity of global grid
  • PRAGMA from March, 2002 to May, 2004
  • Computation resources
  • 10 countries/regions, 26 institutions, 27
    clusters, 889 CPUs
  • Technologies (Ninf-G, Nimrod, SCE, Gfarm, etc.)
  • Collaboration projects (Gamess, EOL, etc.)
  • Grid is still hard to use, especially global grid
  • How to make a global grid easy to use?
  • More organized testbed operation
  • Full-scale and integrated testing/research
  • Long daily application runs
  • Find problems, develop/research/test solutions

Cindy Zheng, GGF13, 3/14/05
7
Routine-basis Experiments
  • Initiated in May 2004 PRAGMA6 workshop
  • Testbed
  • Voluntary contribution (8 -gt 17)
  • Computational resources first
  • Production grid is the goal
  • Applications
  • QM/MD, TDDFT, mpiBlast-g2, Savannah,
  • iGAP over Gfarm
  • Ocean science, Geoscience (proposed)
  • Learn requirements/issues
  • Research/implement solutions
  • Improve application/middleware/infrastructure
    integrations
  • Collaboration, coordination, consensus

Cindy Zheng, GGF13, 3/14/05
8
QMMDhttp//pragma-goc.rocksclusters.org/applicati
ons/qmmd/qmmd_requirement.html
  • Quantum mechanics application
  • Ninf-G based
  • Driver Hiroshi Takemiya (AIST)
  • Ready on 12 sites
  • AIST Yoshio Tanaka, Yusuke Tanimura
  • ASCC Hurng-Chun Lee, Mike Chiang
  • CNIC Kai Nan, Kevin Dong
  • KISTI Jysoo Lee, Jae-Hyuck Kwak
  • KU Somsak Sriprayoonsakul, Sugree Phatanapherom
  • NCHC Weicheng Huang, Chien-Lin Huang
  • NCSA Radha Nandkumar, Tom Roney
  • SDSC Mason Katz, Cindy Zheng
  • TITECH Satoshi Matsuoka, Hitoshi Aoki
  • UNAM Jose Luis Gordillo Ruiz, Eduardo Murrieta
    Leon
  • UoHyd Arun Agarwal, Rajeev Wankar, Neelakanta
    Reddy
  • USM(hawk) Habibah Wahab, Suhaini Ahmad

9
Lessons Learned http//pragma-goc.rocksclusters.o
rg/tddft/Lessons.htm
  • Information sharing
  • Trust and access (Naregi-CA, Gridsphere)
  • Grid software installation (Rocks)
  • Resource requirements (NCSA script, INCA)
  • User/application environment (Gfarm)
  • Job submission (Portal/service/middleware)
  • System/job monitoring (SCMSWeb)
  • Network monitoring (APAN, NLANR)
  • Resource/job accounting (NTU)
  • Fault tolerance (Ninf-G, Nimrod)
  • Collaborations

10
Introduction of APGrid PMAandInternational Grid
Trust Federation
11
Background
  • Many Asia-Pacific countries are going to have
    strong motivation for international collaboration
    with the outside of Asia Pacific.
  • LCG, OSC, TeraGrid, etc
  • PRAGMA TeraGrid, UK-eScience, EGEE, etc.
  • Key issue for the collaboration is CA operation
  • Most Certificate Authorities in Asia-Pacific
    countries were experimental-level
  • No CP/CPS
  • Not strictly operated

12
Background (contd)
  • Problems of authentication federations
  • All CAs should keep the same level of operation.
  • How the CA is securely operated?
  • Use HSM? Dedicated CA room?
  • All CAs should have no conflict in policy
  • How the CA identifies end entities?
  • Use face-to-face meeting? Telephone? etc.
  • Policy Management Authority (PMA) is a
    coordination body of CA policies and operations.

13
Policy Management Authority (PMA)
  • Currently, there are three regional PMAs
  • EUGrid PMA (established May 2004)
  • Former EUDG WP6 CA Coordination Group (started
    in 2002)
  • TAG PMA (going to be established)
  • One of the founding members DOEGrid PMA (started
    in 2002)
  • APGrid PMA (established June 2004)
  • Unofficially started in 2003
  • Each regional PMA is responsible for
  • coordination of CA policy within the region
  • coordination of CA policy with the other regional
    PMAs

14
History of PMAs
  • GGF7_at_Tokyo, March 2003
  • First meeting with EU, DOE, and AP members
  • Agreed with working on forming the Grid PMA.
  • develop minimum requirements
  • develop GridPMA charter
  • Continuous discussions between AP, EU, and TAG
    PMA for International Grid Trust Federation.
  • GGF12 and EUGrid PMA meeting_at_Brussels, September
    2004
  • GGF13_at_Seoul, March 2005
  • EUGridPMA meeting_at_Tallinn, May 2005
  • GGF14_at_Chicago
  • GGF15_at_Boston
  • We (AP, EU, TAG PMAs) have agreed with trust with
    each other for the federation.

15
APGrid PMA Asia Pacific Grid PMA
  • General Policy Management Authority in Asia
    Pacific
  • Not specific for ApGrid, Not specific for PRAGMA
  • Launched on June 1st, 2004
  • Defines minimum CA requirements
  • APGrid PMA approved that we accept two levels of
    CA
  • Experimental-level CA
  • Alternative of the Globus CA
  • Can be trusted within A-P communities
  • Production-level CA
  • Strict management is necessary
  • Expected to be trusted by international
    communities

16
APGridPMA Status (Members and CAs)
Affiliation Name Production CA Experimental CA
AIST / Japan Yoshio Tanaka in operation will close
ASCC / Taiwan Eric Yen in operation none
KISTI / Korea Jae-Hyuck Kwak in operation in operation
CAS / China Kai Nan Under review in operation
IHEP / China Gonxing Sun in operation none
APAC/Australia David Bannon Under review in operation
NAREGI/Japan Shinji Shimojo In operation in operation
NCHC / Taiwan Julian Yu-Chung Chen Under review in operation
SDSC / USA Mason Katz planning planning
NECTEC / Thailand Sornthep Vannarat Planning In operation
NGO / Singapore Jon Lau Planning none
KEK / Japan Takashi Sasaki Planning none
HKU / HongKong Chen Lin, Elaine no plan in operation
U of Hyd / India Arun Agarwal no plan in operation
USM / Malaysia Boon Yaik no plan in operation
Osaka U / Japan Susumu Date no plan in operation
17
APGridPMA Activities (contd)
  • Defines and approves documents such as charter
    and the minimum CA requirements
  • Accreditation of CAs
  • 6 accredited CAs
  • AIST, IHEP, KISTI, NAREGI, ASGCC
  • in operation
  • APAC, KEK
  • going to be in operation
  • Audit
  • Audit checklist was drafted based on WebTrust
    criteria and the minimum CA requirement
  • AIST, ASGCC, IHEP, CNIC have been audited by the
    other CAs.

18
APGridPMA Activities
  • Regular (monthly) VTC.
  • Brief status reports of each CA
  • In-depth report of a CA
  • Decisions
  • Examination for accreditation of a CA
  • Approval of charter, minimum CA requirements,
    etc.
  • Open discussions
  • (physical) face-to-face meeting once per year.
  • 1st face-to-face meeting was in Dec. 2005,
    Beijing.
  • Discussions by emails
  • Discussions with the other PMAs

19
Status and challenges
  • International Grid Trust Federation (IGTF) has
    been officially approved at the GGF15, Boston,
    October 2005.
  • Three PMAs are the founders of the IGTF
  • Three PMAs agreed with trust with each other.
  • e.g. CAs accredited by APGrid PMA can be trusted
    by EUGrid PMA and TAGPMA.
  • Information (CA certificate, policy file, etc.)
    of Asia Pacific CAs accredited by APGrid PMA has
    been included a CA distribution package released
    by EUGrid PMA.

20
Distribution of CA information
  • Periodic, monthly, distribution of all trust
    anchors
  • Common for the entire IGTF
  • Includes all trust anchors for all
    profilesclassic, SLCS, experimental,
  • Does not distinguished between accrediting PMAs
  • Wide variety of formats
  • RedHat Package Management (RPM) systemincluding
    a meta package with dependencies per profile
  • tar archives per CA, ordered per profile
  • Installation bundle suitable for ./configure
    make install
  • New formats (like JKS) on request
  • Chairs can update the common back-end repository

21
Summary of the APGrid PMA and the IGTF
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com