Securitization of Insurance Risks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Securitization of Insurance Risks

Description:

Designed to use large capacity of financial markets to diversify risks where ... a small portion of a large risk reduces risk premium required, ample capacity. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: Robert60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Securitization of Insurance Risks


1
Securitization of Insurance Risks
  • RMI 4700
  • Insurance Operations
  • Robert Klein

2
Securitization of Liabilities
  • Involves creating a financial instrument (e.g.,
    cat bond) that effectively diversifies or hedges
    a primary insurers underwriting risk.
  • Designed to use large capacity of financial
    markets to diversify risks where conventional
    reinsurance is less efficient and/or capacity
    constrained.
  • Some risks more suitable for securitization than
    others.
  • Catastrophe options and bonds have been primary
    instruments.

3
Catastrophe Call Option Spread
  • CBOT exchange-traded contracts that settle on
    loss indices developed by PCS.
  • Index (x a) 100 M 1 point
  • Example 20/40 call spread
  • If event caused 30B in losses, each contract
    would pay 2,000 (100 points x 20).


0 for x lt a (x a) for a ltx ltb (b
a) for x gt b
b
f(x)
f(x)
x industry losses
a
B
20
40
4
Limited Volume of Cat Options Traded
5
Catastrophe Bond
  • Insurer issues bonds with interest equal to
    risk-free rate risk premium 350-600 basis
    points (for 1 probability loss).
  • Investors receive principal plus interest if no
    event.
  • All or portion of interest and principal forgiven
    if event occurs.

6
Typical Structure of Catastrophe Bond with
Special Purpose Reinsurer
Insurer
Principal and/or Interest given a trigger event
Premium Payment
Single Purpose Reinsurer
Contingent Principal and/or Interest payment
Principal
Investors
7
Moral Hazard vs. Basis Risk
  • Basis risk refers to disconnect between payout
    on contract ceding insurers losses.
  • Tying payout to ceding insurers losses raises
    moral hazard risk.
  • Non-Parametric Triggers
  • Tied to cedant loss
  • Lowers basis risk, but increases moral hazard.
  • Parametric Triggers
  • Not tied to cedant loss
  • Based on physical event, e.g., storm or
    earthquake intensity.
  • Or, total industry losses.
  • Depending on trigger, high basis risk potential.
  • Dual Triggers
  • Parametric Non-Parametric

8
Reinsurance vs. Securitization
  • Reinsurance
  • Basis risk tends to be minimized to extent treaty
    based on losses of ceding insurer.
  • Moral hazard has to be controlled through
    contract terms and monitoring by reinsurer.
  • Tail risk easier to handle in reinsurance.
  • Reinsurer provides other services, e.g., risk
    assessment.
  • But, capacity constrained for catastrophes high
    risk premium.
  • Securitization
  • Each investor can efficiently take a small
    portion of a large risk ? reduces risk premium
    required, ample capacity.
  • Basis risk vs. moral hazard addressed through
    triggers and other devices.

9
Issues in Future of Securitization
  • Insurer demand
  • Investor knowledge and acceptance.
  • Transaction costs.
  • Regulatory treatment.
  • Most securitizations have been done offshore to
    avoid taxes.
  • NAIC adopted model legislation that would
    facilitate onshore SPRVs Protected Cells.
  • Some reinsurers fighting onshore SPRVs and
    proposal for favorable tax treatment.
  • It will take time for securitization vehicles to
    be refined and market to develop.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com