SEARCH Observing Change Panel: Update on past activities and plans for the next year - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

SEARCH Observing Change Panel: Update on past activities and plans for the next year

Description:

(ii) jointly with UCP & RCP oversee implementation of AON by (a) identifying ... observation effort beyond IPY; implement amphibious buoy; work for improved buoy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: HajoE7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SEARCH Observing Change Panel: Update on past activities and plans for the next year


1
SEARCH Observing Change Panel Update on past
activities and plans for the next year
  • OCP Overview
  • Activities Arctic Observation Integration
    Workshops, 2008 Sea Ice Outlook, Coordination of
    agency-based and international observing
    activities
  • Input needed CADIS Advisory Group
  • Priorities for next year Coordination of
    observations with agencies, cross-panel
    assessment of observing efforts, refine Outlook

2
  • SEARCH Observing Change Panel
  • Charge
  • (i) Work with the broader scientific community to
    develop and at opportune intervals update SEARCH
    Arctic Observing Network (AON) Implementation
    documents,
  • (ii) jointly with UCP RCP oversee
    implementation of AON by (a) identifying
    unexplored or undeveloped synergies between
    individual AON projects and other ongoing
    national and international observation programs,
    (b) identifying gaps in the observation network
    relative to the goals of the SEARCH program, (c)
    outlining potential partnerships with other
    agency programs relevant to the SEARCH AON
    effort, (d) helping ensure a broader legacy of
    the AON that extends beyond IPY
  • (iii) provide feedback and advice as sought by
    the SEARCH SSC, Data Working Group, UCP, and RCP
    on relevant aspects of the science and
    methodology of observing change in the Arctic
    environment
  • (iv) provide a link between the SEARCH
    observational programs and the broader scientific
    community to ensure flow of information and
    promote scientific exchange, promote
    international collaboration and coordination of
    Arctic observing system activities with
    complementary programs by colleagues in other
    countries.
  • Members (new members appointed in 2008 shown in
    italics)
  • Carin Ashjian, Hajo Eicken, Craig Fleener, Larry
    Hinzman, Ron Kwok, Craig Lee, Peter Murdoch,
    Maribeth Murray, Steve Oberbauer, Don Perovich,
    Eric Rignot, Taneil Uttal

3
Arctic Observation Integration Workshops
  • March 2008, Palisades, NY NSF AON ARCSS
    sponsorship with strong international
    contribution under SEARCH for DAMOCLES umbrella
  • Three components for effective interaction and
    development of synergies
  • Arctic Observation Network (AON) Meeting
  • Autonomous Lagrangian Platforms Workshop
  • Lessons from the 2007 Arctic Sea Ice Minimum
    Workshop
  • Selected short-term recommendations (details in
    report at www.arcus.org/search/Meetings/2008/aow/r
    eport.php)
  • AON Assessment of how well SEARCH goals are
    addressed strengthen interagency coordination
    tools to coordinate field research Sea Ice
    Outlook as synthesis tool explore integration of
    model output into CADIS portal data coordination
    at international level CADIS Advisory Group
    guidance of observations by stakeholder priorities

4
Arctic Observation Integration Workshops
  • Selected short-term recommendations (details in
    report at www.arcus.org/search/Meetings/2008/aow/
    report.php)
  • Lagrangian Platforms sustain observation effort
    beyond IPY implement amphibious buoy work for
    improved buoy access to eastern Arctic harden
    ice-based observatory components for ice
    transition seasons continue adaptation of
    floats/gliders to ice environment white paper
    detailing acoustic navigation array
  • 2007 Arctic Sea Ice Minimum Implement Sea Ice
    Outlook as analysis and synthesis tool
    retrospective assessment of Outlook and follow-up
    workshop synthesis papers on 2007 ice summer
    ecosystem impacts (incl. paleo-data) synthesize
    ecological human-dimensions information
    identify further datasets needed modeling effort
    to explore scenarios projections to inform
    management policy
  • Long-term recommendations (details in report)
    focus on data information management,
    interagency international coordination,
    implementation of arctic-wide integrated
    ocean/ice observing array, integration of
    observations models to arrive at scenarios

5
2008 Arctic Sea Ice Outlookwww.arcus.org/search/s
eaiceoutlook
  • International effort- integrated, community-wide
    anticipation, summary and evaluation of 2008
    summer season (Core Integration Group chaired by
    J. Overland prepared outlooks from submissions
    Advisory Group reviewed draft prior to release)
  • Builds on recommendations of March 2008 Arctic
    Observations Integration Workshop
  • Monthly poll on September 2008 anticipated
    minimum ice extent, integrating model output and
    observations of ice evolution (18 different
    groups contributed)
  • Summary evaluation released in early October 2008
    w/ strong recommendation for continuation of
    effort in 2009

6
May Outlook
 Increasing predictive skill as summer
progresses, reflected in responses shifting to
higher values centering around observed 2008
minimum Ensemble simulations with ice-ocean
model hold promise
July Outlook
7
2008 Arctic Sea Ice Outlookwww.arcus.org/search/s
eaiceoutlook
  • Good agreement between projections and
    observations (July Outlook media 0.2x106 km2
    above observation in September)
  • Conclusions Late spring ice conditions major
    driver of 2008 season, role of summer weather
    patterns well captured by ensemble simulations
    and surface observations, future evolution
    inconclusive but indications are for few years at
    current level before further reduction,
    replacement of multi- by first-year ice may
    provide for more predictability in future
  • Improvements needed Remote sensing of
    spring/summer sea ice, ice-thickness fields for
    initialization, more rigorous forecasting/evaluati
    on methods, anticipation of ice evolution on
    interannual scales - to be addressed in improved
    effort in 2009
  • Positive assessment by broader community several
    federal agencies very supportive, e.g., of value
    to NOAA w/ respect to climate-services discussion

8
Sea Ice Outlook Next steps www.arcus.org/search/s
eaiceoutlook
  • Fall 2008 Preparation of journal article (Eos)
    summarizing ice situation and evaluating Outlook
    as a synthesis tool
  • 17 December 2008 Sea Ice Outlook Community
    Meeting at Fall AGU Meeting (time place tba via
    web site and ArcticInfo)
  • January/February 2009 Sea Ice Outlook Working
    Group Meeting and Community eMeeting to
    synthesize results, identify strengths
    weaknesses of effort and plan for dedicated
    effort 2009 (NOAA workshop support anticipated)
  • February/March 2009 Final Sea Ice Outlook
    Retrospective Report published
  • Winter/spring 2009 Planning for 2009 Sea Ice
    Outlook effort based on feedback and
    recommendations

9
Interagency coordination
  • Low-level discussions with a number of
    researchers and research coordinators within
    federal agencies fruitful but more is required
  • Timely topic with IPMC raising the issue at last
    SEARCH SSC meeting, new IARPC AON Working Group
    in place relevant agency observing programs
    underway
  • Discussions within OCP on best way to move
    forward (two agency contacts Peter Murdoch,
    USGS, and Taneil Uttal, NOAA)
  • In collaboration with the IPMC, IRPC, P. Murdoch
    C. Lee to develop plan for small-scale meeting
    in DC with agency representatives to explore
    options for improved interagency coordination in
    the context of AON and other observing activities
    (Spring 2009)
  • To be further developed through potential theme
    of interagency coordination for next AON
    Investigators Meeting, tentatively scheduled for
    late summer/early fall 2009
  • In preparation, request that agencies provide
    update on SEARCH activities by populating project
    database athttp//www.arcus.org/search/catalog/p
    ublic/catalogsearch.phpSEARCH project office to
    prepare official request to agencies

10
International coordination
  • OCP participation in Sustained Arctic Observing
    Networks (SAON) workshops
  • Some discussion of SAON in relation to SEARCH and
    ISAC OCP submitted comments on SAON draft report
    for final SAON workshop
  • Main points
  • Need to address rapidity of change requires a
    highly adaptive observing system with strong ties
    to scientific research underpinning observations
  • Strong linkage needed between observing program,
    modeling activities and decision makers and
    stakeholders in need of information for
    management and planning
  • Arctic change is coupled (environmental,
    socio-economic, geopolitical) and requires strong
    interdisciplinary approaches, e.g. as those
    underlying Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
    focusing on services delivered by ecosystems
  • Operational and research observing programs need
    to be brought together, requiring discourse among
    key groups, incl. industry, enforcement and
    others who are starting to ramp up large Arctic
    programs
  • What is the potential role of ISAC?

11
CADIS Advisory Group
  • AON Arctic Observation Integration Workshop
    called for implementation of CADIS Advisory Group
    (CAG)
  • Previous discussion of phasing out of SEARCH Data
    Working Group with completion of SEARCH Data
    Management Plan
  • OCP discussed internally w/ SEARCH Data Working
    Group members, drafted Terms of Reference for CAG
    and identified potential members willing to serve
  • CAG to serve as liaison between CADIS and
    prospective data information users providers-
    articulate needs of AON and broader SEARCH
    investigators, advise CADIS on products
    services
  • CAG to be implemented by SEARCH SSC and to report
    to OCP

12
CADIS Advisory Group
  • Terms of Reference - DRAFT
  • The CADIS Advisory Group (CAG) serves as a
    liaison between CADIS and prospective data and
    information users and providers from the
    scientific community and among stakeholders.
    Specifically, the CAG should help articulate the
    needs of Arctic Observing Network (AON) and other
    SEARCH investigators with respect to CADIS
    services and products. The group should also
    provide advice to CADIS on its products and
    services as needed.
  • In order to be effective, the CAG should be
    comprised of roughly a half dozen members
    representing the observing change components of
    SEARCH (through the OCP and AON PIs) as well as
    the broader Arctic environmental change research
    community (through SEARCH SSC members with
    appropriate expertise). A member representing
    broader data management expertise or stakeholder
    information needs may be included as needed. The
    group is formed under the SEARCH governance
    structure and reports to the Observing Change
    Panel. CAG activities would be coordinated by the
    CAG Chair in consultation with CADIS, SEARCH SSC
    and OCP and the cognizant NSF program officer.

13
CADIS Advisory Group
  • Suggestions for members
  • SEARCH SSC representation Max Holmes
  • SEARCH/ARCSS representation Don Perovich
  • SEARCH OCP representation Carin Ashjian, Steve
    Oberbauer
  • SEARCH Data Working Group Transition Dave
    McGuire
  • Others?

14
Next steps
  • Assessment of AON responsiveness to SEARCH goals
    by UCP - task and supporting materials being
    assembled similar tasking for RCP
  • Integration of existing Arctic observing system
    components scientific level, agency level,
    international level - role of SEARCH as
    integrator?
  • Defining (redefining?) and building partnerships
    with agencies - DC meeting AON Investigators
    meeting other steps?
  • Cross-panel coordination and integration first
    steps taken with UCP RCP needs to be addressed
  • Role of Cyberinfrastructure in data archival and
    dissemination Still an open question
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com