Work Choices and the Regulation of Working Time - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Work Choices and the Regulation of Working Time

Description:

If we are to reach a better balance between work and family ... The Government's workplace relations reforms will continue to ... disadvantage test abolished ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: andrews72
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Work Choices and the Regulation of Working Time


1
Work Choices and the Regulation of Working Time
  • Professor Andrew Stewart
  • School of Law, Flinders University
  • Hawke Institute Symposium, 7 February 2006

2
Choice and flexibility at the workplace
  • If we are to reach a better balance between
    work and family then we must continue to make
    sensible, practical and fair changes to the
    workplace relations system.
  • The Governments workplace relations reforms
    will continue to ensure that the choices provided
    to Australian families, through more jobs, secure
    income, stronger protections and increased
    flexibility, will be maximised.
  • WorkChoices A New Workplace Relations System,
    October 2005

3
Regulation of working time in Australia
  • Unlike many other countries, no general statutory
    regulation of working time (as opposed to leave)
  • recent exceptions in Victoria (WR Act 1996 Sch
    1A) and Qld (IR Act 1999 s 9)
  • But detailed regulation of arrangements in
    particular industries, occupations or firms
    through award system
  • note in particular constraints on scheduling of
    work hours and imposition of penalty rates for
    work at anti-social times

4
The Work Choices reforms
  • Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act
    2005
  • amends Workplace Relations Act 1996 with effect
    from March/April 2006
  • expands federal system of regulation to cover
  • all trading, financial and foreign corporations
  • all other employers in Victoria and Territories
  • Commonwealth agencies
  • should cover at least 75 of workforce

5
Impact on regulation of working time
  • 2 main areas of potential impact
  • new minimum standards on working time and leave
  • increased flexibility for agreement-making on
    working time
  • Though need to see these in context of other
    changes that make it harder for workers to
    contest management decisions/initiatives
  • eg removal of unfair dismissal rights,
    restrictions on industrial action, etc

6
Some background
  • As in other countries, pursuit of working time
    flexibility in Australia since 1970s has sprung
    from two sometimes divergent objectives
  • enhancing worker flexibility and autonomy (eg
    flexitime, RDOs)
  • enhancing employer control over work scheduling
    and hence enterprise efficiency

7
What EB has meant for working time
  • Under formalised enterprise-level bargaining
    promoted since late 1980s
  • real wages have continued to rise for all workers
    (cf experience in other countries)
  • but major trade-offs sought and won by employers
    on regulation of working time (dominant item on
    EB agenda for most)
  • constraints on scheduling hours lessened/removed
  • annualised salaries to remove penalty rates
  • greater capacity to schedule or even buy out leave

8
What EB has meant for working time
  • Some outcomes have promoted worker-oriented
    flexibility
  • eg extension of sick leave to cover carers
    leave, provision of paid maternity leave
  • But employer-oriented flexibility has dominated
  • cf federal governments repeated claims about
    family-friendly provisions

9
Two other important features
  • The disappearing middle in working time in
    Australia
  • many working either excessively long hours or in
    part-time employment
  • Prevalence of casual employment
  • often in fact involves stable and long-lasting
    engagements
  • but generally perceived (whether rightly or not)
    to give employer almost total flexibility over
    hours

10
The new minimum standards
  • Australian Fair Pay and Conditions Standard, plus
    separate standard on holidays
  • Apply to all employees working for federal system
    employers, except where
  • contract or workplace agreement more favourable
    (as per rules to be set out in regulations)
  • award has more favourable provisions on annual,
    personal or parental leave
  • pre-reform federal or State agreement applies

11
Working hours standard
  • 38 ordinary hours per week (or averaged over
    agreed period of up to a year)
  • employee can also be required or requested to
    work reasonable additional hours
  • judged by reference to various factors, including
    both personal circumstances and operational
    requirements
  • employee also entitled to be paid for each hour
    they are required or requested to work, but no
    right to be paid overtime or penalty rates

12
Leave standards
  • 4 weeks annual leave, plus extra week for some
    shiftworkers
  • up to 2 can be cashed out on written request from
    worker, but only pursuant to a workplace
    agreement
  • Personal leave
  • 10 days paid sick/carers leave, plus extra 2
    days unpaid carers leave if needed, plus 2 days
    paid compassionate leave per occasion
  • 12 months unpaid parental leave

13
Public holidays
  • Employee entitled to take a day off on public
    holidays
  • But may be requested by employer to work, and
    must establish reasonable grounds for refusal
  • relevant factors again include both personal
    circumstances and operational requirements

14
Agreement-making
  • Award-based no-disadvantage test abolished
  • Hence employers may lawfully offer agreements
    that reduce or remove controls on scheduling of
    hours or leave
  • Award provisions on penalty rates are
    protected, but only in the sense that
  • they apply unless explicitly overridden by an
    agreement
  • they apply if agreement terminated and not
    replaced

15
The impact in practice
  • At best
  • continuation of steady trend towards greater
    employer control over work scheduling
  • minority of employers continue to develop
    genuinely family-friendly arrangements
  • At worst, aggressive cost-cutting in some sectors
    sees elimination of penalty rates without
    compensation

16
The impact in practice
  • No obvious effect in countering socially damaging
    long hours culture
  • Perhaps more jobs and hours for underemployed,
    but at the expense of even greater strain on
    family time
  • Unless of course we can trust the market
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com