Dr Paul T Mativenga - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Dr Paul T Mativenga

Description:

School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering ... Disjointed or Invisible Circles-Goals. Academia (academic expertise) Industry (needs) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: ifmEng
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dr Paul T Mativenga


1
Implementing technical and experimental
projects/case studies
Dr Paul T Mativenga Manufacturing and Laser
Processing School of Mechanical, Aerospace and
Civil Engineering
2
What is a case study (common view)
An in-depth study of an individual unit where
that unit is approached as an example of some
larger phenomenon.
3
???
  • Who is doing a technical/experimental PhD?
  • Whose technical/experimental PhD has a case study
    component?
  • Whose technical/Experimental PhD is a case study?

4
When do we need a technical case study
  • Introducing new technology Step change needed,
    new legislation
  • Process improvement Increased demand, tighter
    output requirements, better products
  • Reclaiming of systems in decline - e.g. company
    observes quality issues, bridge is about to
    collapse

5
Getting into the organisation
  • Understand the overlap between immediate
    organisational goals and your expertise
  • The academic solution may not have value to a
    commercial problem.
  • Industry may not necessarily be interested in
    your ideas but in how you think and approach
    problems

6
Constraints on engagement
  • Technical processes are covered by
  • Patents
  • Non disclosure agreements
  • Collaboration agreements
  • Censorship
  • There is limited scope for dissemination that can
    be obtained by undertaking technical case studies
    or case implementation in a commercial company.

7
Winning an industrial collaboration case
8
Disjointed or Invisible Circles-Goals
Academia (academic expertise)
Industry (needs)
9
Establishing the intersection
  • Industry does not broadcast institutional
    challenges/problems/focus areas.
  • Personal relations are a vital part in gaining
    access into a company and successfully taking
    through a case implementation or technology
    transfer project
  • Networking
  • Conferences
  • SME are more accessible than large companies
    (most large companies have strategic University
    partnerships)
  • Visit institutional functions or seminars IMechE,
    IET
  • Publicise your capability, expertise, facilities
    etc.

10
Why would a company agree to a case
implementation/study
  • Process not in control
  • Process lead time too long
  • Need to increase plant capacity
  • New processing route required
  • New materials to be processed

11
Implementing a technical project (case study) in
a PhD
  • You have a new idea and want to try it out NOT
    ENOUGH
  • You have a tried idea but want to take it to a
    different application - YES
  • You have a proven idea but what to develop
    operating envelop and process repeatability - YES
  • You have a working prototype but want to scale it
    up for pre-production (on actual machines, actual
    components) - NO

12
Technology Readiness Levels
When a new technology is first proposed/invented/c
onceptualized, it is not suitable for immediate
application. New technologies should normally be
subjected to experimentation refinement and more
representative/realistic testing. Once the
technology is sufficiently proven, it can be
incorporated into a system/subsystem. Technology
Readiness Level (TRL) is a measure used to assess
the maturity of evolving technologies prior to
incorporating that technology into an industrial
process or system/subsystem.
13
(No Transcript)
14
TRL and MCRL
  • While Technology Readiness Levels (TRL)s are
    generic to all technologies, Manufacturing
    Capability Readiness Levels (MCRL) are more
    focussed on implementation of manufacturing
    technologies

15
Manufacturing Capability Readiness
Level(Technology assessment and proving)
  • MCRL1 Process concept proposed with scientific
    foundation.
  • MCRL2 Applicability and validity of concept
    described demonstrated and vetted
  • MCRL3 Analytical and experimental critical
    function and/or characteristic proof-of-concept
    completed.
  • MCRL4 Technology component and/or basic
    technology subsystem validated in laboratory
    environment using representative development
    equipment.

MCR1 to 4 Relevant to a PhD could be a PhD
16
Implementing a technical project
17
Manufacturing Capability Readiness
Level(Pre-production)
  • MCRL5 Basic capability demonstrated using
    production equipment (validation in relevant
    environment).
  • MCRL6 Process optimized for capability and rate
    using production equipment.

18
Manufacturing Capability Readiness
Level(Production Implementation)
  • MCRL7 Technology system prototype demonstration
    in an operational environment (capability and
    rate confirmed via economic run lengths on
    production parts).
  • MCRL8 Actual technology system completed and
    qualified through test and demonstration. Fully
    production capable process qualified on full
    range parts over significant run lengths.
  • MCRL9 Fully production capable process on full
    range of parts over extended period. Actual
    technology system qualified through successful
    mission operations.

19
TRL Pros and Cons
Advantages include Provides a common
understanding of technology status Enables the
making of decisions concerning transition of
technology Enables risk management to be used to
make decisions concerning technology funding
Disadvantages include More reporting,
paperwork, reviews and meetings Systems
engineering not addressed in early TRLs
20
Who Pays
21
A dream
  • A man had a recurring dream. He dreamt he was
    being shown the secrets of the universe.
  • Each morning he woke up but would not remember
    what the secret was.
  • He went to a wise man and asked for advice on how
    he could capture the secrete in the dream
  • Take a piece of paper and pen to bed

22
  • Think in other terms

23
Criteria for industry engagement
  • THE WORK PACKAGE HAS TO BE
  • Realistic Manage risk
  • Achievable Demonstrate capability of delivery
  • Quantifiable Goal money/cost reduction/lead
    time reduction/process capability
  • Time bound industry wants results fast and in
    the promised delivery time.

24
Investigation Techniques
  • Analytical modelling Enables inferred
    understudying of process)
  • Computer Modelling (e.g. Finite Element
    Modelling)
  • Experimental and analytical/computer modelling
    (closes the loop)
  • Experimental Design Techniques Factorial
    design/Taguchi experiments
  • Serial Testing and Mechanism studies (answers the
    why and how. Can effect a step change)

25
Concluding Remarks - 1
  • Manufacturing technology is an applied science
  • The true value of manufacturing technology
    innovation has to be realised through
    implementation in industry or as company spin
    offs
  • New and original ideas may not be ready for
    implementation in an industrial environment
  • Technology readiness levels can be applied in the
    transfer of research expertise from academia to
    industry
  • Academic expertise has to be matched to
    industrial commercial needs.
  • Implementing manufacturing technology within a
    commercial company needs a project that is
    REALISTIC, ACHIEVABLE, QUANTIFIABLE AND TIME
    BOUND

26
Concluding Remarks - 2
  • A fact is a simple statement that everyone
    believes. A hypothesis is a novel suggestion that
    no one wants to believe. It is guilty until found
    effective
  • Edward Teller (1908-2003)
  • Think beyond the possible and then back off to
    reality
  • Sir Robin Saxby, 2008

27
The value of technical ideas
  • Okay we have set-up manufacturing facilities,
    organised the distribution network, hired the
    marketing expertise, and allocated the
    advertising budget.
  • Any ideas for a product?

28
Thank You We can open the discussion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com