CAPACITY BUILDING : LITHUANIAS EXPERIENCES FROM 10 YEARS OF REFORM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

CAPACITY BUILDING : LITHUANIAS EXPERIENCES FROM 10 YEARS OF REFORM

Description:

... FROM 10 YEARS OF REFORM. Vilnius, Lithuania. 20-21 ... 1998REFORM OF MUNICIPAL BUDGET FORMATION PRINCIPLES STAGE I ... REFORM SWOT ANALYSIS:OPPORTUNITIES ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: FM775
Learn more at: https://www.oecd.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CAPACITY BUILDING : LITHUANIAS EXPERIENCES FROM 10 YEARS OF REFORM


1
CAPACITY BUILDING LITHUANIAS EXPERIENCES FROM
10 YEARS OF REFORM
  • Vilnius, Lithuania
  • 20-21 March, 2007

2
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
  • PREREQUISITES OF THE REFORM
  • GOALS AND IMPLEMENTATION STAGES
  • REFORM SWOT ANALYSIS

3
SITUATION BEFORE
  • POOR STATE FINANCIAL SITUATION IN 1998-1999
  • CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICIT 12
  • FISCAL DEFICIT 8 in 1999
  • GOVERNMENT BORROWING INTEREST RATE - 1214
  • LARGE AMOUNT OF EXTRABUDGETARY FUNDS
  • NO LINKS BETWEEN POLICY FORMATION AND BUDGETING
  • POOR DECISION MAKING PROCESS
  • NO FISCAL RELATIONS ACROSS LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT

4
FACTORS STIMULATED REFORMS
  • STRONG POLITICAL WILL
  • ASPIRATION FOR EUROPEAN-ATLANTIC INTEGRATION
  • ATTITUDE OF SOCIETY TOWARDS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
  • POOR FINANCIAL SITUATION

5
GOALS OF THE BUDGET REFORM
  • CONSOLIDATION OF PUBLIC FINANCIAL RESOURCES
  • PRIORITY BASED PLANNING
  • RESULT ORIENTED ACTIVITIES
  • RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY
  • TRANSPARENCY

6
IMPLEMENTATION STAGES1998 ?REFORM INITIATIVE
  • THE SEIMAS RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET STRUCTURE
  • REFORM CONCEPTION
  • - THREE-YEAR PLANNING
  • - PROGRAMME BUDGET
  • - CONSOLIDATION OF RESOURCES
  • - TRANSPARENCY

7
IMPLEMENTATION STAGES1998?REFORM OF MUNICIPAL
BUDGET FORMATION PRINCIPLES STAGE I
  • THE LAW ON THE METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINATION OF
    MUNICIPAL BUDGETARY REVENUE
  • MUNICIPAL BUDGETS FORMATION PRINCIPLE TO
    OBSERVE THE REVENUE EQUALISATION PRINCIPLE TO
    CARRY OUT ALL FUNCTIONS OF MUNICIPALITIES

8
IMPLEMENTATION STAGES1999?PROGRAMME BUDGET
  • THE DRAFT OF STATE BUDGET WAS PREPARED BY
    PROGRAMMES AND SUBMITED TO THE SEIMAS FOR ITS
    CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL
  • PROGRAMMING BUDGETING IS OBLIGATORY TO ALL
    APPROPRIATION MANAGERS

9
IMPLEMENTATION STAGES2000?GOVERNMENT STRATEGIC
PLANNING SYSTEM
  • STRATEGIC PLANNING METHODOLOGY IS OBLIGATORY TO
    ALL STATE BUDGET APPROPRIATION MANAGERS
  • RECOMENDED TO MUNICIPALITIES
  • THE INTEGRATED PLANNING MODEL AND THE LONG-TERM
    DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY WAS ESTABLISHED
  • THE LAW ON THE GOVERNMENT AND THE LAW ON THE
    BUDGET STRUCTURE EMBED THE STRATEGIC PLANNING AS
    A MEASURE FOR ORGANISATION OF ACTIVITIES AND
    FINANCING PLANNING

10
IMPLEMENTATION STAGES2001? REFORM OF MUNICIPAL
BUDGET FORMATION PRINCIPLES STAGE II
  • THE ESSENCE OF THE REFORM
  • TO USE THE REVENUE EQUALISATION PRINCIPLE ONLY
    FOR CARRYING OUT INDEPENDENT FUNCTIONS OF
    MUNICIPALITIES
  • TO ALLOCATE GRANTS FROM THE STATE BUDGET FOR
    IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNCTIONS DELEGATED BY THE
    GOVERNMENT

11
IMPLEMENTATION STAGES2003?EVALUATION OF BUDGET
IMPLEMENTATION
  • THE INTERNAL AUDITS FUNCTIONS
  • TO EVALUATE THE ECONOMY, EFFECTIVENESS AND
    EFFICIENCY OF THE PROGRAMS, WAS IMPLEMENTED IN
    PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
  • THE EXTERNAL AUDIT INTITUTIONS FUNCTIONS
  • TO EVALUATE WHETHER APPROPRIATIONS ALLOCATED
    HAVE BEEN USED FOR THE GOALS SET IN THE
    PROGRAMMES
  • TO EVALUATE WHETHER APPROPRIATIONS HAVE BEEN
    USED AT THE HIGHEST POSSIBLE EXTENT OF ECONOMY
    AND IN THE MOST EFFECTIVE MANNER

12
IMPLEMENTATION STAGES2003-2004?DECISION IMPACT
ASSESSMENT
  • ADOPTION OF THE DECISION IMPACT ASSESSMENT
    METHODOLOGY ON
  • - AN ADEQUATE AREA
  • - ECONOMICS
  • - PUBLIC FINANCES
  • - SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT
  • - CORRUPTION EXTENT
  • - ENVIRONMENT

13
IMPLEMENTATION STAGES2005?PERFORMANCE
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA SYSTEM
  • OUTCOME / IMPACT CRITERION AN ASSESSMENT
    CRITERION FOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE INSTITUTIONS
    STRATEGIC GOAL
  • RESULT CRITERION AN ASSESSMENT CRITERION FOR
    THE FULFILMENT OF THE PROGRAMME OBJECTIVE
  • OUTPUT CRITERION AN ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION
    ASSESSMENT CRITERION

14
REFORM SWOT ANALYSISSTRENGTHS
  • A UNIFORM STRATEGIC PLANNING METHODOLOGY
  • INSTITUTIONS ACTIVITIES BASED ON SYSTEMATICAL
    PLANNING AND LINKING WITH FINANCING
  • COMPREHENSIVELY REGULATED PLANNING PROCESS
  • A POSSIBILITY TO ANALYSE AND TO ASSESS AN
    INSTITUTION AS A SYSTEM IN PURSUIT OF THE GOALS
    SET
  • INSTITUTIONS ARE ENCOURAGED TO ORIENT THEIR
    ACTIVITIES TOWARDS THE RESULTS
  • MORE RATIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF FINANCIAL, MATERIAL
    AND HUMAN RESOURCES
  • PUBLICITY OF PROVIDING INFORMATION AND ITS
    COMPREHENSIVENESS TO THE PUBLIC

15
REFORM SWOT ANALYSISWEAKNESSES
  • INADEQUATE INSTITUTIONAL HUMAN RESOURCES AND
    CAPACITIES
  • FORMULATION OF STRATEGIC GOALS OF AN INSTITUTION
    RESTS WITH THE INSTITUTION ITSELF
  • STRATEGIC PLANNING IS APPLIED NOT IN ALL
    ADMINISTRATION LEVELS
  • STRATEGIC PLANNING IS HIGHLY FORMALISED

16
REFORM SWOT ANALYSISOPPORTUNITIES
  • DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLANNING SYSTEM IN CONNECTION
    WITH ACCOUNTABILITY
  • FURTHER CAPACITY BUILDING OF PUBLIC SERVANTS IN
    THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC PLANNING
  • LESS FORMALISED STRATEGIC PLANS WOULD BE MORE
    COMPREHENSIBLE AND USEFUL TO THE PUBLIC AND
    POLITICIANS

17
REFORM SWOT ANALYSISTHREATS
  • STRATEGIC PLANNING SYSTEM MAY BECOME DECLARATORY
    AND FORMAL
  • SEGREGATION OF STRATEGIC PLANNING AND BUDGETING
    PROCESSES
  • NON-PERCEPTION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF STRATEGIC
    PLANNING MAY POSE THREATS TO ITS REDUNDANCY IN
    THE FUTURE

18
FINDINGS
  • CAPACITY BUILDING IN ALL LEVELS OF PUBLIC
    ADMINISTRATION
  • SYSTEM SHALL BE UNIQUE IN DECISION MAKING AND
    BUDGETING PROCESS
  • HUMANISATION OF THE SYSTEM
  • LEARNING STRATEGIC THINKING
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com