A A R H U S U N I V E R S I T E T - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

A A R H U S U N I V E R S I T E T

Description:

What is the typical study environment like in your country compared to ... Informality. Up-to-date education. Independent thinking, challenge professors' ideas ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: cfu8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A A R H U S U N I V E R S I T E T


1
Study culture in DenmarkAugust 2007
  • Hanne Leth Andersen

2
Components of study culture
  • Teaching-learning styles
  • Student-teacher relationship
  • Exam types
  • Work load
  • Living conditions

3
What do you know/believe/think about Danish
study culture?
  • What is the typical study environment like in
    your country compared to that of Denmark?

4
Parameters
  • Exam and grade oriented?
  • Curricula ruled by university or state?
  • Memorization learning?
  • Reflection learning?
  • Independent learning?
  • Mother-tongue teaching?

5
Danish study environment
  • Egalitarian and democratic ideals
  • Students tend to be critical, anti-authoritarian
  • Casual student-teacher relationships ways of
    addressing each other, way of dressing
  • High degree of fairness in exam system
    co-examiners

6
Some characteristics of Danish Education and
Study Culture
  • Punctuality
  • Informality
  • Up-to-date education
  • Independent thinking, challenge professors ideas
  • Critical and analytical approach
  • Debate form and group work
  • Relaxed schedule with time to reflect
  • Interaction instead of reproduction
  • Research oriented
  • Application-based learning
  • Interdisciplinarity

7
Exam types in Denmark
  • Written assignments
  • Written projects on a topic of the students
    choice
  • Oral presentations
  • Analysis
  • Proficiency
  • Project exams
  • Portfolio exams

8
What does it take to get good grades?
  • What is measured?
  • What are the course goals?

9
Blooms taxonomy (1956)
6. Evaluation 5. Synthesis 4. Analysis 3.
Application 2. Comprehension 1. Knowledge
10
SOLO taxonomy (Biggs)
Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome
5
4
3
2
1
Extended abstract
Multi-structural
Pre-structural
Uni-structural
Relational
11
Helpful student qualities
  • Self-motivation, self-reliance
  • Few classes, learning outside class, Students
    expected to play an active role
  • Initiative, dialogue
  • Important to ask questions, ask for advice if
    necessary, clarify teacher expectations, offer
    feedback at mid-term evaluations - will not count
    against you in exam situation
  • Negotiating skills, social intelligence
  • Central role of group work/study groups

12
Seven-point scale
12
A
The excellent performance
A high level of command of all aspects of the
relevant material, with no or only a few minor
weaknesses
B
10
The very good performance
A high level of command of most aspects of the
relevant material, with only minor weaknesses
7
C
The good performance
A good command of the relevant material but also
some weaknesses
Some command of the relevant material but also
some major weaknesses
4
D
The fair performance
E
02
The sufficient performance
A performance meeting only the minimum
requirements for acceptance
00
Fx
The insufficient performance
A performance that does not meet the minimum
requirements for acceptance.
-3
F
The poor performance
A performance which is unacceptable in all
respects
13
(No Transcript)
14
Performance-based grading
  • Qualifications and competences
  • Clear assessment criteria
  • Precise description of exam form
  • Grade 12 is given when
  • Same grading scale in the education system
  • Absolute assessment degree of goal achievement
  • Clear differentiation by jumps in the scale

15
The Bologna Process in Europe
  • Progression Bachelor, Master, Ph.D.
  • Clear goals of education
  • Assessment criteria
  • Qualifications obtained
  • Exam form
  • Merit and comparison with international grading
    scales (ECTS)

16
International StudiesQualifications
  • An understanding of key terminology, concepts,
    theories and methodology used in international
    history, international business analysis,
    international business law, project management,
    international relations and cultural analysis
  • Skills in applying key terminology, theories and
    methodology used in international history,
    international business analysis, international
    business law, project management, international
    relations and cultural analysis to concrete
    situations
  • An understanding of the importance of considering
    multiple contexts
  • Time management skills

17
International StudiesCompetences
  • Translating and mediating between different
    disciplines
  • Identifying, combining and applying relevant
    methods and perspectives to solve specific
    problems
  • Working in international teams
  • Understanding and reflecting on own strengths and
    weaknesses
  • Designing projects to match specific requirements
  • Applying, evaluating and combining different
    perspectives
  • Applying dynamic and flexible approaches to
    international challenges

18
More information
  • Academic regulations for the Masters degree
    programme in International Studies, AU
    http//www.iho.au.dk/en/is/frontpage
  • Andersen, H.L. 2005. Eksamensformer valg med
    konsekvenser, HUM, AU http//www.hum.au.dk/cfu
  • Biggs, J. 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at
    University, OUP, Berkshire
  • Bloom, B.S. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational
    Objectives, David Mc Kay Co, New York
  • Ministery of Educations guide to the new grading
    scale
  • http//www.ug.dk/min20baggrund.aspx?article_idu
    niv-vejlkarakterskal
  • VTU, Qualification Framework
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com