Title: A A R H U S U N I V E R S I T E T
1Study culture in DenmarkAugust 2007
2Components of study culture
- Teaching-learning styles
- Student-teacher relationship
- Exam types
- Work load
- Living conditions
3What do you know/believe/think about Danish
study culture?
- What is the typical study environment like in
your country compared to that of Denmark?
4Parameters
- Exam and grade oriented?
- Curricula ruled by university or state?
- Memorization learning?
- Reflection learning?
- Independent learning?
- Mother-tongue teaching?
5Danish study environment
- Egalitarian and democratic ideals
- Students tend to be critical, anti-authoritarian
- Casual student-teacher relationships ways of
addressing each other, way of dressing - High degree of fairness in exam system
co-examiners
6Some characteristics of Danish Education and
Study Culture
- Punctuality
- Informality
- Up-to-date education
- Independent thinking, challenge professors ideas
- Critical and analytical approach
- Debate form and group work
- Relaxed schedule with time to reflect
- Interaction instead of reproduction
- Research oriented
- Application-based learning
- Interdisciplinarity
7Exam types in Denmark
- Written assignments
- Written projects on a topic of the students
choice - Oral presentations
- Analysis
- Proficiency
- Project exams
- Portfolio exams
8What does it take to get good grades?
- What is measured?
- What are the course goals?
9Blooms taxonomy (1956)
6. Evaluation 5. Synthesis 4. Analysis 3.
Application 2. Comprehension 1. Knowledge
10SOLO taxonomy (Biggs)
Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome
5
4
3
2
1
Extended abstract
Multi-structural
Pre-structural
Uni-structural
Relational
11Helpful student qualities
- Self-motivation, self-reliance
- Few classes, learning outside class, Students
expected to play an active role - Initiative, dialogue
- Important to ask questions, ask for advice if
necessary, clarify teacher expectations, offer
feedback at mid-term evaluations - will not count
against you in exam situation - Negotiating skills, social intelligence
- Central role of group work/study groups
12Seven-point scale
12
A
The excellent performance
A high level of command of all aspects of the
relevant material, with no or only a few minor
weaknesses
B
10
The very good performance
A high level of command of most aspects of the
relevant material, with only minor weaknesses
7
C
The good performance
A good command of the relevant material but also
some weaknesses
Some command of the relevant material but also
some major weaknesses
4
D
The fair performance
E
02
The sufficient performance
A performance meeting only the minimum
requirements for acceptance
00
Fx
The insufficient performance
A performance that does not meet the minimum
requirements for acceptance.
-3
F
The poor performance
A performance which is unacceptable in all
respects
13(No Transcript)
14Performance-based grading
- Qualifications and competences
- Clear assessment criteria
- Precise description of exam form
- Grade 12 is given when
- Same grading scale in the education system
- Absolute assessment degree of goal achievement
- Clear differentiation by jumps in the scale
15The Bologna Process in Europe
- Progression Bachelor, Master, Ph.D.
- Clear goals of education
- Assessment criteria
- Qualifications obtained
- Exam form
- Merit and comparison with international grading
scales (ECTS)
16International StudiesQualifications
- An understanding of key terminology, concepts,
theories and methodology used in international
history, international business analysis,
international business law, project management,
international relations and cultural analysis - Skills in applying key terminology, theories and
methodology used in international history,
international business analysis, international
business law, project management, international
relations and cultural analysis to concrete
situations - An understanding of the importance of considering
multiple contexts - Time management skills
17International StudiesCompetences
- Translating and mediating between different
disciplines - Identifying, combining and applying relevant
methods and perspectives to solve specific
problems - Working in international teams
- Understanding and reflecting on own strengths and
weaknesses - Designing projects to match specific requirements
- Applying, evaluating and combining different
perspectives - Applying dynamic and flexible approaches to
international challenges
18More information
- Academic regulations for the Masters degree
programme in International Studies, AU
http//www.iho.au.dk/en/is/frontpage - Andersen, H.L. 2005. Eksamensformer valg med
konsekvenser, HUM, AU http//www.hum.au.dk/cfu - Biggs, J. 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at
University, OUP, Berkshire - Bloom, B.S. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives, David Mc Kay Co, New York - Ministery of Educations guide to the new grading
scale - http//www.ug.dk/min20baggrund.aspx?article_idu
niv-vejlkarakterskal - VTU, Qualification Framework