Unveiling a Uniform FrontofPackage Nutrition Labeling Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Unveiling a Uniform FrontofPackage Nutrition Labeling Program

Description:

Approach to Fortification. Fortification is credited for purposes of ... Implementing companies will be expected to adhere to FDA fortification policy. 23 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: elizabeth160
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Unveiling a Uniform FrontofPackage Nutrition Labeling Program


1
Unveiling a Uniform Front-of-Package Nutrition
Labeling Program
  • Presentation of the Smart Choices Program
  • Biscuit and Cracker Manufacturers Association
  • 84th Technical Conference
  • September 22, 2009

2
What We Want to Do
  • Introduce you to a new coalition-based approach
    to front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labeling
  • An effort spearheaded by the Keystone Center that
    involved multiple stakeholders
  • Preview the major program components
  • New symbol and calorie information
  • Provide brief overview of the nutrition criteria
    and food categories
  • Including scientific foundation, rationale
  • Discuss our implementation plan and next steps

2
3
About the Keystone Center
  • The Keystone Center works with a broad array of
    stakeholders to develop consensus solutions to
    complex health and social policy changes
  • Wide range of projects in the area of health
    policy
  • Medicine, health care, food and nutrition,
    workplace safety, chronic and infectious diseases
  • The Keystone Food and Nutrition Roundtable was
    established in 2007 to drive durable improvements
    in the American diet and public health
  • Initial focus on the food label
  • Evolved into a discussion of FOP labeling

3
4
About ASN/NSF
  • After conducting in-depth research and
    interviewing candidates, the coalition identified
    American Society of Nutrition (ASN) and NSF
    International (NSF) to serve as the governing
    body and mechanism for this program.

5
Our Coalition-Based Approach
  • Unique, unprecedented partnership
  • Bringing together wide range of perspectives
  • Collaborative effort during last two years
  • Committed to concept of single, uniform system
  • Input included
  • Scientists and nutrition educators
  • Experts with dietary guidelines experience
  • Public health organizations
  • Food manufacturers
  • Retailers

5
6
Government Observers
  • Government agencies served as observers and
    consulted in the dialogue throughout this
    collaborative process
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (ARS and CNPP)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Food and Drug Administration (CFSAN)
  • Federal Trade Commission
  • National Institutes of Health

7
Why We Came Together
8
Need For Alignment
  • Proliferation of labels
  • Numerous front-of-pack symbols and icons
  • Little uniformity
  • Derived from different criteria, have various
    meanings
  • Concerns about potential confusion
  • Clutter the aisles and shoppers minds

8
9
Consistent Message
  • A unified approach will help bring clarity and
    consistency to the marketplace
  • Providing a consistent message no matter where
    someone shops or what brands they buy
  • The end goal
  • To help make it easier for people to quickly
    identify smarter food and beverage choices
  • within product categories

10
How The Group Has Worked
  • Activity
  • Series of plenary meetings
  • Intensive work groups
  • Resources
  • Relying on consensus science
  • Outside expertise in consumer research, creative
    design and communications
  • Key protocols
  • Consensus-based decision making
  • Deliberations off-the-record and not for
    attribution
  • Participants speak as individuals, not
    organizations

10
11
Defining Elements
  • Transparent
  • Nutrition elements (including criteria) and
    governing mechanism
  • Developed collaboratively
  • Scientific consensus, diverse panel of sectors
    and disciplines
  • Cuts potential consumer confusion
  • Simple to use, widely implemented
  • Comprehensive
  • Diet and health needs of entire U.S. population
  • Sustainable
  • Durable over time, responsive to new information
  • Criteria guides food product innovation and
    reformulation
  • Applied voluntarily

11
12
Take A Look
13
(No Transcript)
14
Smart Choices Program
  • A front-of-pack symbol to guide consumers in
    making smarter food and beverage choices
  • Individual products evaluated against nutrition
    criteria established for 19 different product
    categories
  • Front-of-pack calorie information intended to
    help people stay within their daily calorie needs
  • Calories per serving, servings per container
  • Required on products carrying the symbol
  • Nutrition criteria based on nutrients to limit,
    nutrients/food groups to encourage
  • Positive attributes do not compensate for
    nutrients to limit

14
15
Nutrition Criteria
  • Derived from consensus science
  • 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans
  • FDA standard definition for healthy
  • USDA definition for extra lean
  • Additional federal standards and authoritative
    guidance
  • Institutes of Medicine, World Health
    Organization, Centers for Disease Control
  • When necessary, will be revised to reflect
    updated authoritative guidance, including 2010
    Dietary Guidelines for Americans

15
16
Nutrition CriteriaCategory-Specific
  • Nutrients to limit
  • Total fat, saturated fat, trans fat, cholesterol,
    added sugars, sodium
  • Nutrients to encourage
  • Calcium, potassium, fiber, magnesium, vitamin A,
    vitamin C, vitamin E
  • Nutrients of concern as identified in Dietary
    Guidelines for Americans
  • 10 Daily Value (good source)
  • Food groups to encourage
  • Fruits, vegetables, whole grains,
    fat-free/low-fat milk products
  • Provide at least 1/2 serving as identified in
    Dietary Guidelines for Americans

16
17
General Benchmarks
Total Fat
35 of calories
Saturated Fat
lt 10 of calories
Trans Fat
0 g (labeled)
Cholesterol
60 mg per serving
Added Sugars
25 of calories
Sodium
480 mg per serving
18
Calories
  • No authoritative, scientific standard for calorie
    threshold based on 2,000 calorie diet
  • Calorie levels set for
  • Meals, sauces, snacks, desserts and beverages
  • Not applicable for
  • Processed fruits, vegetables, 100 juices
  • Breads, grains, pasta, cereals
  • Fresh/frozen/canned fruits and vegetables with no
    additives
  • Meat, fish, poultry eggs, meat alternatives
  • Seeds, nuts, nut butters
  • Milk, dairy products, dairy substitutes
    (including soy beverages), cheeses/cheese
    substitutes
  • Fats, oils and spreads (including butter)
  • Soups, meal sauces, and mixed side dishes
  • Alternative thresholds for products 100 calories
    or less
  • To prevent lower calorie options from missing the
    mark on smaller portion sizes

19
Food Specific CriteriaSnack Foods and Sweets
  • Calories lt 160
  • Total Fat lt 35 calories or lt 3g/100 calories
  • Saturated Fat lt calories or lt 1g/100 calories
  • Trans Fat 0g labeled
  • Cholesterol lt 60mg/RACC
  • Added Sugar lt 25 calories or 6g/100 calories
  • Sodium lt 240 mg
  • AND
  • Nutrients to Encourage (10 DV Ca, K, Fiber, Mg,
    Vit A,C or E)
  • OR
  • Food Group to Encourage (½ serving Fruits,
    Vegetables, Whole Grains, or Fat free of low fat
    Milk Products)

20
Added Sugars Rationale
In some cases, small amounts of sugars added to
nutrient-dense foods, such as breakfast cereals
and reduced-fat milk products, may increase a
persons intake of such foods by enhancing the
palatability of these products, thus improving
nutrient intake without contributing excessive
calories.
  • Considered on a meal basis
  • WHO (2003) 10 of calories from free sugars,
  • 2000 calorie diet x .10 200 calories/day
  • Based on 4 eating occasions per day
  • 200 calories/4 eating occasions 50
    calories/eating occasion
  • Grams per eating occasion 50 calories/4 12.5
    g (rounded to 12 g)

21
Filling Nutrient Gaps
  • Dietary guidelines recommend eating a variety of
    foods from all food groups every day
  • Smart Choices Program nutrients to encourage
  • Calcium, potassium, fiber, magnesium, vitamin A,
    vitamin C, vitamin E
  • Nutrients of concern as identified in Dietary
    Guidelines for Americans
  • 10 Daily Value (good source)
  • Smart Choices Program food groups to encourage
  • Fruits, vegetables, whole grains,
    fat-free/low-fat milk products
  • Provide at least 1/2 serving as identified in
    Dietary Guidelines for Americans

22
Whole Grains
  • 1/2 serving or 8 g
  • Based on 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans
    16 g 1 oz. equivalent of whole grains
  • USDA statement 8 g significant source of whole
    grains
  • Exceptions
  • Grain-based foods (breads, cereals, pasta, etc.)
  • Whole grains must be gt 50 of the grains (meets
    recommendation that half the grains be whole
    grains/Dietary Guidelines for Americans)
  • Minimum of 8 g of whole grain per serving

23
Approach to Fortification
  • Fortification is credited for purposes of
    qualifying a product to carry the symbol
  • Important to note
  • All nutrients to encourage in the Smart Choices
    Program are shortfall nutrients as identified in
    the Dietary Guidelines for Americans
  • Some product categories do not require a nutrient
    or food group to encourage, in come cases to
    avoid motivating inappropriate fortification
  • Implementing companies will be expected to adhere
    to FDA fortification policy

24
Product Categories
Bread, grains, pasta
  • Nutrients to limit and 1 nutrient or food group
    to encourage

Cereals
  • Nutrients to limit and 1 nutrient or food group
    to encourage

Snack foods and Sweets
  • Nutrients to limit and 1 nutrient or food group
    to encourage

24
25
Why FOP Calorie Information?
  • Calories count!
  • Dietary Guidelines for Americans emphasize
    importance of consuming a healthy diet within
    daily calorie needs
  • Energy BALANCE is essential
  • Calories in vs. calories out is necessary to
    maintain a healthy weight
  • Energy IMBALANCE is key factor contributing to
    overweight and obesity
  • Public policy guidance repeatedly states
    relationship between obesity and health risks

Americans should obtain adequate nutrients within
calorie needs.
2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans
To maintain a constant body weight over time,
energy in from food must equal energy out
FDA Calories Count
Increases in weight are of a concern due to
implications for health. Being overweight or
obese increases the risk of many diseases and
health conditions.
CDC Achieving a Balance
25
26
FOP Calorie Information
  • Identifies calories per serving and number of
    servings per container on the front-of-pack
  • Intended to help people stay within daily calorie
    needs as they make smarter food and beverage
    choices
  • Replicates calorie information from Nutrition
    Facts panel
  • Goals of putting calories on front-of-pack
  • Provide easy to find, easy to read information
  • Provide context around portion size
  • Help people make informed decisions about how
    much of a product to eat or drink
  • Allow for easy calorie comparisons within product
    categories

26
27
How We Came To This Approach
28
Varied Approaches to
FOP Labeling
  • Smart food and beverage choices
  • Fact-based
  • Nutrient profiling
  • Food ranking or scoring
  • Traffic light
  • Nutrient content

29
Benefits of Our Approach
  • Flags the foods and beverages you want to
    encourage
  • Based on consensus science
  • Goes beyond the information in the Nutrition
    Facts panel
  • Not simply a summary of the facts
  • Nutrition criteria specific to product categories
  • Allows for product comparisons within categories
  • Brings calorie information from the back or side
    panel to the front
  • Reinforces the calories count message
  • Reduces the confusion of multiple systems

30
Validated With Consumers
  • Commissioned consumer research by Perception
    Research Services
  • Experts in package labeling field research
  • Qualitative phase
  • To explore reactions to a range of FOP
    expressions to guide refinements and enhancements
  • Quantitative phase
  • To evaluate the extent program elements deliver
    against the in-going brief to help consumers
    easily identify smart food and beverage choices
    within a given category

30
31
Qualitative Research Results
  • Consumers in 8 focus groups told us
  • They like the idea of a sound labeling system
    because
  • It would help them identify smarter food and
    beverages choices would simplify the shopping
    and selection experience
  • It would provide nutritional credibility through
    consistent, uniform standard within product
    categories and brands
  • They found the proposed symbol easy to interpret
  • It clearly communicated smart choices in a
    simple, confident and credible way
  • It provided a source of encouragement and
    approval, was serious, conveyed the idea of good
    nutrition and made them interested in further
    information
  • They thought calorie information on front-of-pack
    would be valuable
  • Easy to see, important information to have

31
32
Key Feedback
With this program you dont have to learn each
companys symbol.
Itll help people to help themselves.
If I make this choice Ill be proud of myself.
I would look closer at the packages that are
marked this way. It would draw me in.
With this, the homework has already been done
for us.
32
33
Key Findings
  • Both options (symbol alone and symbol plus
    calorie information) significantly improve (p
    .01) peoples ability to identify smarter food
    and beverage choices
  • Though eye tracking suggests consumers dont
    immediately notice the symbol or calorie
    information, in actual practice the system
    clearly helps consumers identify smarter food and
    beverage choices
  • Inclusion of the symbol and calorie information
    had no negative effect on consumers likelihood
    of looking at the Nutrition Facts information
  • Consumer perceptions of the symbol and calorie
    information are positive
  • 75 of respondents say both would be helpful in
    making food and beverage choices, as well as
    identifying smarter options among the products
    available

33
34
Additional Consumer Benefit
  • Stimulate product innovations and reformulations
  • R D hard at work changing existing products and
    developing new products that would meet the
    strict nutrition criteria nutrition criteria
  • Change the face of the supermarket
  • Offering more choices to help promote public
    health

35
Whats Next
  • Continue to brief key stakeholders
  • Government agencies, manufacturers and retailers
  • Eight companies have committed to participate
    while dialogue continues with other companies
  • Media outreach began August 2009
  • Consumer education plan TBD
  • Roll-out in summer 2009

35
36
Smart Choices Program
  • Companies participating in
  • the Smart Choices Program
  • Launch include
  • ConAgra
  • General Mills
  • Kellogg
  • Kraft Foods
  • PepsiCo
  • Sun Maid
  • Tyson
  • Unilever

37
www.SmartChoicesProgram.com
  • For more information
  • Please call 877-SCP-1410 (877-727-1410)
  • Sarah Krol, Business Manager, Smart Choices
    Programinfo_at_smartchoicesprogram.com

38
Questions?
38
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com