International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) Relationship Growth Strategy

1
International Aerospace Quality Group
(IAQG)Relationship Growth Strategy

• Ed Bayne
• IAQG General Assembly
• Melbourne Australia
• April 18 2007

2
Strategic Focus
3
Strategy Focus Streams Leaders
4
Civil Airworthiness Authorities

• Andy Brindisi
• IAQG General Assembly
• Melbourne Australia
• April 18 2007

5
Civil Airworthiness Authorities Relationship

• Strategic Purpose
• Enhance safety and quality by the international
  airworthiness authorities and industry leaders
  working together to establish a system where
  aircraft product and parts
• Can be manufactured and maintained almost
  anywhere
• Move quickly and seamlessly to the end item user
• Are supported by electronic documentation
• There is no more than one airworthiness
  authorities action for each industry activity to
  eliminate duplication

6
Civil Airworthiness Authorities Relationship

• Stakeholders
• Civil Airworthiness Authorities
• IAQG members involved in civil aviation
• Civil Aviation supply chain
• Suppliers
• Airlines
• Maintenance Repair Overhaul (MROs)
• Distributors
• Etc.....

7
Activities

• Joint
• Alignment of Airworthiness Authorities and IAQG
  Initiatives
• Common Definitions and Terms
• Authorized Release Certificate (ARC)
• Recognition of Industry Controlled Other Party
  (ICOP)
• and Nadcap Other Party processes
• Authorities input to 9100 revision

8
Activities

• IAQG
• Improved Supplier and Sub-tier Supplier Control
• Supply Chain Management Handbook
• Supply Chain Process Capability
• Product Realization Process
• Authorities
• Common Supplier Surveillance Standard
• identifies the minimum authority requirement to
  an approved production organisation to
  demonstrate satisfactory supplier control with
  the purpose to ensure conformity and traceability
  of the supplied items
• New / revised bilateral agreements

9
Space Forum

• John DeGiovanni
• IAQG General Assembly
• Melbourne Australia
• April 18 2007

10
IAQG Space Forum - Strategy A commonly accepted
QM standard and certification
A global forum for space quality issues - Space
perspective across IAQG initiativesFocus on
quality issues to improve performance across the
industryNetworking
Future State
Current State
Ideas on How to Proceed

• 9100 not optimised for full range of aerospace
  activities.
• 9100 certification scheme not widely applied
  accepted
• Space supply chain more regional than worldwide
• Space too fragmented and small volume to be
  influential
• Strong customer-supplier interactions
  dependency
• Need for better integration of aeronautic and
  space business areas
• Strong project / single product culture more
  emphasis on Product Assurance than QMS
• Space regulations not harmonised globally

• Identify space needs and screen IAQG and other
  (e.g. ISO) initiatives to
• Adopt and deploy suitable initiatives
• Support influence relevant initiatives by
  liaising with the respective teams
• Initiate new space specific initiatives through
  IAQG or other avenues as appropriate
• Support influence the revision of 9100 to fill
  gaps
• Evaluate negotiate changes for and adopt
  certification scheme
• Solicit lessons learned and discuss way of
  sharing them
• Share ideas on at least one top topic per meeting

• Improved space industry performance through
• 9100 as a commonly accepted higher level QMS
  standard
• An 9100-based certification scheme than can be
  applied by all sectors.
• Space processes satisfactorily covered by NADCAP
  AECMA-PRO
• Mechanism to gather best practices.
• Global cross-acceptance of space practices.

11
Future State

• Improved space industry performance through
• 9100 as a commonly accepted higher level QMS
  standard
• An 9100-based certification scheme than can be
  applied by all sectors
• Space processes satisfactorily covered by NADCAP
  AECMA-PRO
• Mechanism to gather best practices
• RMC - understanding of Space uniqueness
• Global cross-acceptance of space practices

11
12
IAQG Space Forum - Roadmap
2010
2006
2008
2007
2009
AS 91002009 reflecting space uniqueness
Consolidate space Inputs to 9100 revision
9102 review
REQUIREMENTS
Discuss initiative Delegation of Product
Assurance functions / tasks
Understand potential scope of certification of
space processes by NADCAP / AECMA-PRO
Product Realization
Understand relevance for space of SUPPLY CHAIN
Management Handbook

• RMC-Space unique
• Unique training

Support development of dictionary

• Identify weak areas of 9100 implementation
• Develop training for space

PEOPLE CAPABILITY
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
ICOP Scheme
13
Events
Waiver/deviations
FRR impacts
CAIB
BMAR
Assumptions/Group think
Integration
Genesis
Subtier controls
Key Characteristics
Manufacturing
Supply
Configuration Management
Risk
Mission Assurance
14
Configuration Management Control

• Space Factors / Unique
• Fleet leader requirements (maximum life)
• Pedigree of unique products
• As built Vs as designed
• Product substitution (critical)
• Production support materials
• Life limits and controls
• MRB acceptance / waivers
• Part obsolescence (EEE)

• Criteria / Requirements
• CM control specs/plans
• Contract
• Deviation / waiver process
• DRD requirements such as ADPs

• Audit Focus
• Pedigree system of compliance
• Process change and controls
• Notification
• Rigor
• MRB control - training and authority
• Procurement control of non production materials
• Acceptance data package rigor
• Planning change control
• Key characteristic management
• Definition
• Rigor and knowledge

• Examples
• Design Application-incorrectly applied
• Genesis sensor installed backwards
• Process change not communicated - External Tank
  change in cleaning (gloves) contaminates parts
• Weld Parameters - un incorporated design changes
• Closed loop traceability - Alert system rigor
• Retrieve/Flow down/Risk Ident

14
15
Defense

• Larry Weng
• IAQG General Assembly
• Melbourne Australia
• April 18 2007

16
Purpose/Scope

• Harmonize 9100 series documents with AQAP and
  other defense agency documents (existing and
  future)
• Contact defense agencies to familiarize them with
  the benefits of utilizing AS9100 series standards.

17
Projects

• Harmonization
• AS9100 writing team Inputs
• Outreach plan

18
NATO Harmonization

• Objective
• Harmonize AQAP 2110 AS 9100
• Progress
• Mapping Gap analysis complete
• WG2 Coordination
• WG2 liaison members assigned
• Attended Prague WG2 meeting
• Establishing Relationship agreement
• Planning IAQG/NATO joint Workshop in Orlando
• Coordinate with NATO standardization focal

19
AS9100 Writing Team Inputs

• Objective
• Provide inputs from Defense Sectors
• Progress
• Inputs from NATO
• Inputs from Europe Asia and Americas sectors
• Provided recommendations to writing team
• Defense Relationship participants on Writing Team
• Francisco Losada
• Hans Ziemer
• Minoru Kasano

20
Outreach Plan

• Objective
• Share industry QMS progress/philosophy with
  Defense Agencies/Ministries
• Progress
• Standard presentation
• Focused engagement with NATO
• Presented at Aerospace Industry Association (AIA)
  meeting
• Meeting with key Defense Agencies in each sector

21
Next Steps

• Continue with NATO Harmonization
• Continue dialog with Defense Agencies
• Resolve 9100 writing team decisions
• Analyze other harmonization opportunities

22
Trade Association Alignment

• Scott Collinge
• IAQG General Assembly
• Melbourne Australia
• April 18 2007

23
Trade Associations Relationship

• Strategic Purpose
• Establish relationships with other aviation
  industry Trade Associations whose purpose and
  objectives overlap those of the IAQG
• Identify areas where IAQG collaboration with
  other Trade Associations would benefit speed of
  deployment of various IAQG projects

24
Trade Associations Relationship

• Approach
• Identify Trade Associations where IAQG member
  companies maintain representation.
• Examples Aerospace Industries Association (AIA)
  Supplier Excellence Alliance etc.
• Identify IAQG member focal points to evaluate
  overlap in goals and objectives.
• Evaluate if IAQG projects would benefit from
  potential collaboration with identified
  associations.
• Pursue collaboration through Memorandum of
  Understanding

Example of our Trade Association Relationship is
ongoing with the Supplier Excellence Alliance
(SEA)
25
SEA Overview

• What is SEA
• The Supplier Excellence Alliance is a non-profit
  industry alliance comprised of aerospace
  defense and space primes/OEMs major
  subcontractors and suppliers working together to
  accelerate improvement of supply chain
  capabilities.
• Board Member Companies

BAE Systems The Boeing Company Body
Coat Bombardier Cessna Cristek Interconnects
Dresser-Rand Firth Rixson Hamilton Sundstrand
Hitco Carbon Composites Honeywell
Aerospace Lockheed Martin Northrop Grumman Parker
Aerospace Photo Etch Pratt Whitney
Roberts Tool Company Rockwell Collins Sikorsky Smi
ths Aerospace Textron TW Metals Tyco
Electronics United Technologies
26
SEA Overview

• SEA Goals
• Engage the most progressive suppliers
• Expand outreach
• Expand service offerings to provide a variety of
  pathways
• Ensure opportunities for small and minority-owned
  suppliers
• SEA Basic Values
• Speed - moving quickly with urgency
• Vision - sharing a common industry vision
• Measurement - measuring our progress
• Integration - a common approach for all

27
Potential Collaboration

• Supply Chain Improvement
• Collaboration in execution of SEAs Roadmap and
  the IAQG development and deployment of the Supply
  Chain Handbook.
• SEAs work on integrating supply chains
  supporting specific prime programs has
  significant traction with sub tier suppliers and
  primes.

28
MOU Elements

• Phase 1 Alliance
• Both parties
• list each other on websites literature and
  other communication as appropriate.  
• list each other as alliance partners using
  language appropriate to each organization.  
• issue press releases stating intention to work
  together.
• provide open invitation to each others member
  meetings as appropriate for each organization.
• SEA and IAQG representatives will conference at
  least quarterly to identify opportunities to
  achieve the aims of this MOU.