Title: Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Forecasting State of the Practice
1Metropolitan Planning OrganizationTravel
Forecasting State of the Practice
- Presented To
- AMPO Modeling Work Group
- By
- Guy Rousseau,
- Atlanta Regional Commission
- TRB Committee 0090 Member
October 23, 2006 Salt Lake City, Utah
2B0090Committee for Determination of the State of
the Practice in Metropolitan Area Travel
Forecasting
- The origin of the study requested of the
National Research Council and Transportation
Research Board, by United States Department Of
Transportation Office of the Secretary, Federal
Highway Administration, and Federal Transit
Administration. - The scope This project gathers information and
determines the state of the practice for
metropolitan area travel demand modeling by
metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) and
state departments of transportation (DOTs). In
addition, the committee identifies actions needed
to ensure that the appropriate technical
processes are being used for travel modeling.
3The committee membership
- Chairman
- Martin Wachs, RAND Corporation
- Members
- Laura L. Cove, North Carolina DOT
- Thomas B. Deen, Transportation Consultant
- George B. Dresser, Texas AM University
- Ronald W. Eash, Northwestern University
- Robert A. Johnston, University of California,
Davis - Eric J. Miller, University of Toronto
- Michael R. Morris, North Central Texas Council of
Governments
- Richard H. Pratt, Richard H. Pratt Consultant,
Inc. - Charles L. Purvis, Oakland Metro Transportation
Commission - Guy Rousseau, Atlanta Regional Commission
- Mary Lynn Tischer, Virginia Department of
Transportation - Richard E. Walker, Metro Portland
- Staff
- Jon M. Williams, Transportation Research Board
- Steve Godwin, Transportation Research Board
4Process of the Committee
- We have met 4 times, once jointly with this AMPO
models group - We have received information from a number of
sources - listening sessions during our meetings,
- national survey of MPO modeling practice (by
BMI-VHB) - survey of states (DOTs) to determine what role
they have for metropolitan travel forecasting - extensive literature review
- targeted research on such topics as the history
of FHWA / FTA funding for MPOs and the accuracy
of 20-year MPO land use forecasts
5MPOs Providing Responses to Survey
6Survey Objectives
- Support TRB Committee B0090 by noting modeling
practices that are - Unusual
- Questionable
- Likely represent advance state-of-the-practice
- Deficient
- Ways to improve modeling
- Otherwise of special interest
7Top Ten Best Model Features
10. Multipath Transit Assignment
10. Detailed Operations Outputs
9. Accurate Land Use Data
8. Intersection Impedances
7. GIS Based
6. Multiplicity of Trip Purposes
5. Modes/Mode Choice Model
4. Standardized Model
3. Zone/Network Details
2. Well Calibrated and Validated
- Ease of Use/Flexibility
- Source MPO-DOT survey
8Top Ten Worst Model Features
10. Lack of Tour Based Activity Model
9. No Mode Choice Model
8. Lack of Commercial Vehicle/Truck/Freight
Modeling
7. Lack of Toll/HOT Lane Modeling
6. Lack of Recent Quality Calibration
5. Lack of Travel Survey Data
4. Lack of Time of Day
3. Trip Generation
2. Lack of Detail/Quality of Mode Choice in Model
- Land Use Forecasting (see next slide as to why
that is.????.....!!!) - Source MPO-DOT survey
9(No Transcript)
10Committee Next Steps
- We have written a draft report that includes
discussion, findings, and recommendations for
both policy and technical topics. This report is
currently under review by the committee. - Following the completion of our committee review,
our report will be subject to an external peer
review by about 8 reviewers. Once the comments
of these reviewers are satisfied, the report will
be edited and published - Release of the report at the TRB Annual Meeting
seems unlikely. -
- At the TRB Annual Meeting, and the 2007
Transportation Planning Applications conference
(see www.trb-appcon.org), there will likely be
presentation of the final findings of the
national survey of MPO travel modeling practice