Public Health Information Network PHIN Series II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 139
About This Presentation
Title:

Public Health Information Network PHIN Series II

Description:

Information Network (PHIN) Series II. Outbreak ... Interviewer: In the last 7 days, how many times did you eat prepared food at the dorm cafeteria? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:232
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 140
Provided by: amy65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public Health Information Network PHIN Series II


1
Public Health Information Network (PHIN) Series
II
  • Outbreak Investigation Methods
  • From Mystery to Mastery

2
(No Transcript)
3
Access Series Files Online http//www.vdh.virgini
a.gov/EPR/Training.asp
  • Session slides
  • Session activities (when applicable)
  • Session evaluation forms
  • Speaker biographies
  • Alternate Web site http//www.sph.unc.edu/nccphp/
    phtin/index.htm

4
Site Sign-in Sheet
  • Please submit your site sign-in sheet and
  • session evaluation forms to
  • Suzi Silverstein
  • Director, Education and Training
  • Emergency Preparedness Response Programs
  • FAX (804) 225 - 3888

5
Series IISession V
  • Interviewing Techniques

6
Series II Sessions
7
CDCOutbreak Management System
Software Support National Center for Public
Health Informatics outbreakms_at_cdc.gov / (800)
532-9929, option 6
8
OMS Applications
  • Track demographics, case investigations, and
    exposure contact relationships for persons,
    animals, events, travel events, vehicles,
    objects, organizations, other organisms, and
    locations.
  • Create household, social, or occupational
    relationships among records
  • Run OMS on desktops or laptops CAPI

9
OMS User Interface
Source http//www.cdc.gov/phin/software-solutio
ns/oms/index.html
10
OMS User Interface
Source http//www.cdc.gov/phin/software-solution
s/oms/index.html
11
OMS in Virginia
  • Contact
  • Michael A. Coletta, MPH
  • Bioterrorism Surveillance Coordinator
  • Division of Surveillance and Investigation
  • Office of Epidemiology
  • Telephone (804) 864-8099
  • Email michael.coletta_at_vdh.virginia.gov

12
Todays Presenters
  • Aaron Wendelboe, MSPH
  • Doctoral Candidate and
  • Graduate Research Assistant,
  • NC Center for Public Health Preparedness
  • Erin Rothney, MPH
  • Research Associate,
  • NC Center for Public Health Preparedness

13
Interviewing Techniques Learning Objectives
  • Upon completion of this session, you will
  • Recognize the interrelatedness of interview
    techniques and questionnaire design
  • Understand key survey research terms
  • Understand the advantages and disadvantages of
    face-to-face, telephone, and computer assisted
    interview methods

14
Learning Objectives (contd.)
  • Understand the advantages and disadvantages of
    mail and Web-based survey implementation
  • Know what to address in interviewer training
  • Recognize good interview techniques
  • Understand confidentiality concerns from the
    perspectives of both the respondent and the
    outbreak investigator

15
Lecturer
  • Aaron Wendelboe, MSPH
  • Doctoral Candidate and
  • Graduate Research Assistant,
  • NC Center for Public Health Preparedness

16
Basic Steps of an Outbreak Investigation
  • Verify the diagnosis and confirm the outbreak
  • Define a case and conduct case finding
  • Tabulate and orient data time, place, person
  • Take immediate control measures
  • Formulate and test hypothesis
  • Plan and execute additional studies
  • Implement and evaluate control measures
  • Communicate findings

17
Interviewing Techniques
  • Introduction

18
Introduction
  • The role of interviews in outbreak investigations
  • Types of interviewing methods
  • Interrelatedness of interview method and
    questionnaire design
  • Key survey research concepts
  • Sampling
  • Response rates

19
Role of Interviews in Outbreak Investigations
  • Primary purpose data collection
  • Case identification
  • Risk factor identification
  • Hypothesis generation

20
Interviewing Methods
  • Interviewer Administered
  • Face-to-face
  • Telephone
  • Self Administered
  • Mail-out
  • Email
  • Web-based
  • Combination of 1 and 2

21
Questionnaire Design
  • Interview Method Influenced by
  • Length and format of questionnaire
  • Question types used in a survey
  • Cost considerations for survey implementation

22
Sampling
23
Sampling
  • Sampling is the systematic selection of a
    portion of the larger source population. A
    sample should be representative of the larger
    source population.

24
Sampling
Source Pop Students (12,000)
Sampled pop (150 students)
25
Sampling
  • Why Sample?
  • Because it is more efficient saves time and
    money!

26
Sampling
  • Sample size
  • Is the purpose of the study to determine the
    source of the outbreak?
  • A small number of cases and controls can reveal
    risk factors for infection.
  • Is the purpose of the study to determine the
    number of persons who become sick over a specific
    period of time attack rate?
  • A cohort study would require a larger sample.

27
Sampling
  • Types of Sampling
  • Simple Random Sample (SRS)
  • Randomly select persons to participate in study.
    There are many variations of SRS.
  • Convenience Sample
  • Choose those individuals who are easily
    accessible.

28
Sampling
  • Problems with Convenience Sampling
  • Based on subjective judgment
  • Cases may or may not be representative of the
    total population
  • May lead to biased results

29
Sampling
  • Additional Resources
  • http//www.sph.unc.edu/nccphp/training/all_trainin
    gs/at_sampl.htm
  • Sampling Case Studies
  • Survey Sampling Precision, Sample Size, and
    Conducting a Survey
  • Survey Sampling Terminology and Methods

30
Response Rates
31
Response Rates
  • Response rates measure the percentage of your
    sample that has participated in your survey.
  • Example
  • Using the campus directory, you email a survey
    to a random sample of 100 freshmen. 40 of those
    students complete the survey and return it
    electronically. Your response rate is 40.

32
Response Rates
  • High response rates ensure that survey data are
    representative of the source population, and that
    results will be valid.

33
Response Rates
  • Types of Non-response
  • Non-contact No one at home
  • Refusal to participate
  • Inability to participate (due to language barrier
    or physical or mental condition)

34
Response Rates
  • What is an average response rate?

35
Response Rates
  • Determining Response Rates
  • Refer to the American Association of Public
    Opinion Research website www.aapor.org
  • Link to the document titled, Standard
    definitions from the home page.

36
Interviewer AdministeredData Collection
Considerations
37
Interviewer Administered Data Collection
  • Advantages and disadvantages of
  • face-to-face interviews
  • Advantages and disadvantages of telephone
    interviews
  • Advantages and disadvantages of Computer assisted
    interviews

38
Face-to-Face Interview
  • Advantages
  • Higher response rate
  • Longer survey instrument
  • Can have more complex skip patterns
  • More accurate recording of responses
  • Less item non-response
  • Appropriate for hard to reach populations (e.g.,
    illiterate, institutionalized)

39
Face-to-Face Interview
  • Disadvantages
  • Costly
  • Potential for interviewer error
  • Less anonymous than self-administered
  • Potential for dishonesty

40
Telephone Interview
  • Advantages
  • Less costly than face-to-face
  • Higher response rates than mailed
  • Quicker access to participants
  • Supervision of interviewers feasible
  • Can collect more sensitive information
  • Survey design can be more efficient

41
Telephone Interview
  • Disadvantages
  • Lower response rates than face-to-face
  • Shorter questionnaires used
  • Unable to capture important visual information
    (e.g., rash, working conditions)
  • Under-coverage (e.g., population without phones)
  • 2.1 of total population in Virginia

42
Computer Assisted Interviewing (CAI)
  • CATI Telephone
  • CAPI Personal
  • ACASI Audio

43
CAPI ExampleNC PHRST Teams
  • NC PHRST Team public health professionals use
    PDAs for rapid needs assessment face-to-face
    interviews.
  • PDA Personal Digital Assistant, also sometimes
    called hand-held computers, palmtops, and pocket
    computers

44
Field Data Collection
EPI Info GIS
Wireless WIFI 802.11 or Bluetooth
Field Team 4
Field Team 5
Field Team 1
Field Team 2
Field Team 3
Field data collection using IPAQ Pocket PCs
equipped with GPS, GIS software and data
collection forms.
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
vs.
  • Pros
  • Inexpensive
  • No special skills required for data recording
  • Cons
  • Requires double data-entry
  • Greater risk of data errors
  • Clipboard and paper more cumbersome in the field
  • Pros
  • Eliminates double data entry
  • Provides routing and direction-finding for field
    teams
  • Improved randomization through GIS
  • Ability to quickly analyze and map data
  • Cons
  • Technology is expensive
  • Learning curve / required training for data entry
  • Small screen size requires scrolling through many
    questionnaire pages

48
For More Information. . .
  • Steven Ramsey, RS
  • Team Leader / Industrial Hygienist
  • PHRST-5
  • Guilford County Health Department, NC
  • (336) -641-8192

49
Self AdministeredData Collection Considerations
50
Self-administeredData Collection
  • Advantages and disadvantages of
  • mailed questionnaires
  • Advantages and disadvantages of
  • Web-based questionnaires

51
Mailed Questionnaire
  • Advantages
  • More anonymous
  • May collect more honest responses
  • No interviewer error
  • Less expensive
  • Respondent has more time to think about question

52
Mailed Questionnaire
  • Disadvantages
  • Questionnaire must be simple
  • Higher item non-response
  • Lower response rate
  • Data collection takes more time
  • Sample population must be literate
  • Coverage / frame deficiencies

53
Web-based Questionnaire
  • Advantages
  • Among some populations, most people may have
    access to the Web / email
  • Inexpensive and fast
  • No data entry required
  • Improves data quality
  • Many vendors send data in a variety of formats

54
Web-based Questionnaire
  • Disadvantages
  • Mandatory access to and experience with Internet
  • Potential connection speed and hardware /
    software capacity limitations
  • Potential for multiple responses from one
    individual
  • Potential for responses from non-sampled
    respondents
  • Need email address list to contact sample

55
Web-based Questionnaire
  • Example Dartmouth University 698 (13.8) of
    5060 students had conjunctivitis in spring 2002
  • To identify risk factors...
  • web-based questionnaire set up
  • E-mail sent to 3682 undergraduates
  • No data entry - rapid analysis
  • 1832 responded (50 response rate)
  • -- Source An outbreak of conjunctivitis due
    to atypical Streptococcus
  • pneumoniae. N Engl J Med. 2003348 (12)1112-21.

56
Web-based Questionnaire
  • For a list of vendors that provide Web-based
    survey tools, please visit
  • http//www.surveymonkey.com/Pricing.asp

57
Question and Answer Opportunity
58
5 minute break
59
Standardizing Interviews
60
Standardizing Interviews
  • The goal of standardization is to help minimize
    error, thereby yielding better data quality
  • Minimizing interviewer error is done through
    making surveys more standard or consistent

61
Error
  • Interviewer Error
  • Deviation from expected answer due to the
    effects of interviewers.

62
Interviewer ErrorExample Gonorrhea outbreak
  • Bias
  • Interviewers probe on the sexual history
    section more among non-whites than whites
  • Variance
  • A male interviewer may elicit different
    responses from a female respondent than a female
    interviewer.

63
Error
  • Additional Resource
  • Schwarz, N., Groves, R., and Schuman, H.,
    Survey Methods Chapter 4 in Gilbert, D. et al
    (Eds) (1998). The Handbook of Social Psychology.
    Boston McGraw-Hill pp 143 179.

64
Standardizing Interviews
  • Contributing Factors
  • Question wording
  • Interviewer selection
  • Interviewer training
  • Interviewing procedures
  • Supervising interviewers

65
1. Question Wording
66
Question Wording
  • Criteria for Standardized Interview Questions
  • Must be fully scripted
  • Must mean the same thing to every respondent

67
2. Interviewer Selection
68
Interviewer Selection
  • Criteria for Telephone Interviewer Selection
  • Ability to read questions fluently
  • Clear and pleasant telephone voice
  • Responds quickly to respondents questions
  • Reliability

69
Criteria for Face-to-FaceInterviewer Selection
  • Logistical skills (reading maps)
  • Good interpersonal skills
  • Independent workers
  • Reliability
  • In certain circumstances, parallel demographic
    characteristics among interviewers and
    interviewees

70
3. Interviewer Training
71
Interviewer Training
  • Training is NOT optional!
  • Trainings must be interactive
  • Interviewers must practice reading questions out
    loud
  • Provide support documentation (manual)

72
Interviewer TrainingElements
  • Purpose of survey
  • How to use data collection instrument
  • Respondent selection process
  • Intent and meaning of each question
  • How to record/code responses
  • Administering questionnaire
  • Addressing participants questions
  • Methods for improving response rate
  • Tracking calls / completed surveys / call- backs
  • Confidentiality

73
Interviewer Training
  • Respondent Selection Process
  • Provide proxy respondent rules for adults and
    children because proxy response impacts
  • Data quality
  • Sampling

74
Interviewer Training
  • Questionnaire Administration
  • To establish legitimacy of the survey upon first
    contact, tell the respondent
  • Who is calling
  • What is requested
  • Why respondent should cooperate
  • How respondent was chosen

75
Interviewer TrainingLogistics
  • Face-to-Face
  • Reading maps
  • Getting to respondents homes
  • Reimbursement
  • Dress code
  • Scheduling callbacks
  • Telephone
  • Operation of equipment
  • Operation of CATI software (if applicable)

76
Interviewer Training
  • Other Considerations
  • Record some resolution to each question
  • Are missing responses due to skip patterns or
    errors?
  • Review interview after completion
  • Missing responses
  • Illegible responses

77
Interviewer Training
  • Interviewer Manual
  • An interviewer manual serves as a reference to
    interviewers during interviews and as survey
    documentation.

78
Interviewer Training
  • Suggested Interviewer Manual Contents
  • Background information
  • Fieldwork
  • Interviewing techniques
  • Survey instrument terms and definitions

79
Interviewer Training Program Example
  • Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)

80
BRFSS Interviewer Training
  • On-line training covers
  • Why BRFSS data are important, how data are used
  • Interviewer responsibilities
  • Nuts and bolts of the interviewing process
  • Interviewing techniques

81
BRFSS Interviewer Training
  • On-line interviewer training available at
  • http//apps.nccd.cdc.gov/BRFSS_Training_Int/overv
    iew.asp
  • General information about BRFSS
    http//www.cdc.gov/brfss/

82
4. Interviewing Procedures
83
Interviewing Procedures
  • Rules
  • Read questions exactly as worded
  • Probe inadequate answers, if necessary
  • Record answers without interviewer discretion
  • Maintain rapport with respondents
  • Maintain an even pace

84
Interviewing Procedures
  • Read questions exactly
  • Read entire question before accepting an answer
  • Clarify questions if necessary

85
Interviewing Procedures
  • Read questions exactly
  • Use only standard definitions / clarification
    provided
  • Use the phrase Whatever x means to you, OR
    Whatever you think of as x.
  • When asked to repeat only one of several response
    options, repeat ALL options given for a question

86
Interviewing Procedures
  • Probe
  • A probe is a standardized way to obtain
    additional information from a respondent.
  • Use probes when a respondents answer is unclear
    or irrelevant.

87
Probe
  • Examples of responses requiring a probe
    Interviewer "In the past two weeks, have you
    been swimming in a public pool?
  • Irrelevant Response I swam in a lake at a
    national park last month."
  • Unclear Response I stayed in a hotel with a
    pool when I was on vacation last week."

88
Interviewing Procedures
  • Standard Probe Examples
  • Repeat the question
  • Retrieve receipts / calendars
  • What do you mean? How do you mean?
  • If respondent has narrowed down answer
  • Which would be closer?
  • If you had to choose, which would you pick?

89
Interviewing Procedures
  • Recording Answers
  • Do not direct respondent toward an answer
    (leading)
  • Do not assume that an answer received in
    passing is correct
  • Do not skip questions, even if answer was given
    earlier
  • Do not remind respondent of earlier remark if
    answer differs from what you expect

90
Probing versus Leading
  • Example
  • Interviewer In the last 7 days, how many times
    did you eat prepared food at the dorm cafeteria?
    Would you say
  • None d. 3 times
  • Once e. More than 3 times
  • Twice
  • Respondent
  • Oh, gee, I didnt go very often . . . maybe a
    few times.

91
Probing versus Leading
  • Example
  • Interviewer Probe (correct)
  • Which would be closer none, once, twice, 3
    times, or more than 3 times?
  • Interviewer Leading (incorrect)
  • So, would you say twice, or three times?
  • b. Do you mean twice, or three times?

92
Interviewing Procedures
  • Maintain Rapport
  • An interviewer should be
  • Nonjudgmental
  • Noncommittal
  • Objective

93
Maintain Rapport
  • Any line can be said a thousand ways.
  • - BRFSS interviewer training
  • Interviewers can put respondents at ease by
    doing the following
  • Read the questions in a friendly, natural manner
  • Speak at a moderate rate of speed
  • Sound interested
  • Strive for a low-pitched voice

94
Feedback Helps Maintain Rapport
  • Feedback is a statement or action that indicates
    to the respondent that s/he is doing a good job.
  • Give feedback only for acceptable performance -
    not good" content.
  • Give short feedback phrases for short responses,
    longer feedback for longer responses.
  • Specific study information and interviewer
    task-related comments can serve as feedback.
  • Telephone interviewers should give feedback for
    acceptable respondent performance 30-50 of the
    time.

95
Feedback Examples
  • I see
  • Uh-huh
  • Thank you / Thanks
  • That is useful / helpful information
  • I see, that is helpful to know
  • That is useful for our research
  • Let me get that down
  • I want to make sure I have that right (REPEAT
    ANSWER)
  • We have touched on this before, but I need to
    ask every question in the order that it appears
    in the questionnaire

96
Interviewing Procedures
  • Maintain Even Pace
  • Pace refers to the rate of progression of the
    interview.
  • Pace can vary by question type.
  • Let the respondent set the pace.

97
Question and Answer Opportunity
98
Activity Correct Interview ProceduresProbing
vs. Leading vs. Feedback
  • Completion time 5 minutes

99
Activity
  • Interviewer Are you still experiencing
    Diarrhea?
  • Respondent 1 Im not sure
  • Respondent 2 I definitely had diarrhea last
    Tuesday
  • Respondent 3 Yes
  • Activity Instructions
  • How should the interviewer respond to these 3
    answers? Provide an example of either a
    clarification, probe, or feedback that the
    interviewer could use. Try to think of one
    correct use of each technique.

100
Activity
  • Suggested Answer
  • Respondent 1 Im not sure
  • Try a clarification
  • For the purposes of this survey, we consider
    diarrhea to be 3 or more loose bowel movements in
    a 24 hour period.

101
Activity
  • Suggested Answer
  • Respondent 2
  • I definitely had diarrhea last Tuesday
  • Try a Probe
  • OK, but are you still experiencing diarrhea?

102
Activity
  • Suggested Answer
  • Respondent 3 Yes
  • Good Feedback I see
  • Bad Feedback Are you sure? (leading)

103
5. Supervising Interviewers
104
Supervising Interviewers
  • Monitoring, evaluation, and feedback given to
    interviewers should focus on the way interviewers
    handle the question-answer process.

105
Other Supervision Tasks
  • Scheduling interviewers
  • Number of interviewers needed
  • Time calls / visits will be made
  • Setting up interview space
  • Tracking who has been called and who has not
  • Reviewing data from completed interviews

106
Confidentiality
107
Confidentiality
  • Human Subjects Informed Consent
  • Outbreak investigations are considered a public
    health emergency, with the purpose of identifying
    and controlling a health problem. Informed
    consent or Institutional Review Board (IRB)
    clearance are not required.

108
Confidentiality
  • Human Subjects Informed Consent
  • If further analysis of outbreak investigation
    data is conducted for the purpose of research,
    IRB approval should be obtained.

109
Confidentiality
  • Respondent Perspective
  • Opening statement of every interview should
    indicate that all information collected will be
    kept confidential.

110
Confidentiality
  • Outbreak Investigation Perspective
  • Do not discuss details about the outbreak
  • Provide only a brief description of the purpose
    of the survey at first contact

111
Question and Answer Opportunity
112
5 minute break
113
Guest Lecturer
  • Erin Rothney, MPH
  • Research Associate
  • NC Center for Public Health Preparedness

114
Overview
  • Provide real-life examples of situations where
    you will use interviewing techniques
  • Face-to-face interviewing
  • Telephone interviewing
  • Discuss advantages and disadvantages
  • Compare interviewing methods

115
Face-to-face Interviews
116
Community Assessments
  • Identify the needs and strengths of a particular
    community from several stakeholder perspectives
  • Include interviewing community members and
    observing the environmental and individual
    characteristics and community infrastructure
  • Similar to rapid needs assessments, but completed
    within a longer time frame

117
Durham, NCCommunity Assessment
  • Fall 2002 - Spring 2003
  • Bragtown Neighborhood, Durham, NC
  • 5 person team
  • Interviewed residents and other stakeholders in
    Bragtown
  • 4 page survey, 60 minutes in length

118
Durham, NCCommunity Assessment
  • Tasks
  • Questionnaire design
  • Interviewer training
  • Interviewing
  • Facilitating focus groups
  • Analyzing data
  • Presenting data to the community

119
Survey Instrument
  • Question Examples
  • Life in the Community
  • What do people in Bragtown do for recreation?
  • What types of religion are practiced in Bragtown?
  • What do people in Bragtown do for a living?
  • What political or government organizations exist
    in Bragtown?
  • What different cultural and ethnic groups live in
    Bragtown?
  • How do these different groups interact? Do they
    get along?
  • Community Assets
  • What do you like about Bragtown?
  • What are some organizations within your community
    that positively affect you or your community?
  • Probe What about political groups,
    environmental groups, church groups?
  • Who are the individuals within your community
    that you feel are positive leaders or role
    models?
  • Probe Any others?

120
Interviewer Training
  • Active listening skills
  • Showing empathy
  • Using probes
  • Practice interviewing, not just reading questions

121
Face-to-face Interviews
  • Challenges
  • Hard to find people at home
  • People may not want to invite a stranger into
    their home
  • Costly and time-intensive method of interviewing
  • Solutions
  • Schedule time ahead by phone or stop by and
    schedule more convenient time
  • Use the skills you learned in interviewer
    training to gain trust
  • Have someone on staff train others on
    interviewing techniques carpool set time limits

122
Lessons Learned
  • Study community demographics and characteristics
    before you interview
  • Train interviewers before an immediate need
  • People like to tell you their stories- could lead
    to relevant information

123
Telephone Interviews2004 E. coli Outbreak
Investigation
124
E. coli Outbreak Investigation Telephone
Interviews
  • Illness onset October - November 2004
  • Geographically dispersed cases in multiple states
  • Case-control study
  • Train-the-trainer, interviewer

125
E. coli Outbreak InvestigationTelephone
Interviews
  • Between 3 and 6 interviewers
  • Calls made between 3 p.m. and 8 p.m.
  • Quality control with one central interviewing
    location
  • News coverage piqued peoples interest in the
    outbreak investigation

126
Lessons Learned
  • Practice reading through the questions and
    conducting an interview
  • The media can be your friend
  • Use an introductory script to relate the purpose
    of the phone call to the individual quickly
  • Identify and legitimize the interviewer
  • State reasons for conducting the survey
  • Assure that responses will be confidential

127
Summary
  • Telephone
  • Outbreak Investigation
  • News coverage helped in recruiting people to
    participate
  • Widely distributed sample
  • We had the phone numbers of all the people who
    pre-bought tickets
  • Face-to-face
  • Community Assessment
  • Establish rapport
  • Identify people in a small geographic area
  • Assess the environment of the area

128
Question and Answer Opportunity
129
Session Summary
130
Session Summary
  • Questionnaire design and interview methods are
    interrelated in the overall process of an
    outbreak investigation.
  • The primary purpose of interviews in outbreak
    investigations is to collect data for case
    identification, risk factor identification, or
    hypothesis generation.

131
Session Summary
  • Interview methods can be interviewer administered
    (face-to-face or telephone) or self administered
    (mailed, emailed, or Web-based). There are
    advantages and disadvantages to employing either
    method.
  • Sampling is the systematic selection of a
    representative portion of the larger source
    population to be interviewed. If the purpose of
    your study is to determine the point source of
    infection, you may be able to interview a smaller
    sample if the purpose of your study is to
    calculate an attack rate, you may need to
    interview a larger sample.

132
Session Summary
  • Survey response rates measure the percentage of
    your sample that has participated in your survey.
    Average response rates vary from as little as
    56 for mailed surveys to 75 for face-to-face
    surveys.
  • Non-response to surveys can be a result of no one
    being home, refusal to participate, or individual
    inability to participate (e.g., because of a
    language barrier or physical or mental
    condition).

133
Session Summary
  • Survey data collection error is a result of both
    bias and variance in the interview process.
  • Interviewer error can be prevented with adequate
    interviewer training and the standardization of
    survey instruments.

134
Session Summary
  • Develop and distribute an interviewer manual to
    provide interviewer support. Such documentation
    reduces error and enhances the quality of data
    collected.
  • Sound interviewing procedures include reading
    questions exactly as they are worded probing
    inadequate answers recording answers without
    interviewer discretion and maintaining rapport
    with respondents.

135
Next Session November 3rd100 p.m. 300 p.m.
  • Topic Analyzing Data

136
References and Resources
  • American Statistical Association (1997). What Is
    a Survey? More About Mail Surveys. Alexandria,
    VA Section on Survey Research Methods, American
    Statistical Association.
  • American Statistical Association (1997). What Is
    a Survey? How to Collect Survey Data.
    Alexandria, VA Section on Survey Research
    Methods, American Statistical Association.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    (2005). Outbreak Management System Demonstration
    Web site. http//www.cdc.gov/phin/software-soluti
    ons/oms/index.html.

137
References and Resources
  • Fowler, F. and Mangione, T. (1990).
    Standardizing Survey Interviewing. Newbury Park
    Sage Publications.
  • Gregg, M. (ed). (1996). Field Epidemiology.
    Oxford University Press.
  • Holstein, JA and Gubrium, JF. (1997). Active
    Interviewing. In Silverman, D. (Ed.) Qualitative
    Research Theory, Method, and Practice. London
    Sage Publications, pp. 113-129.
  • Last, J.M. (2001). A Dictionary of Epidemiology
    4th Edition. Oxford University Press New York.

138
References and Resources
  • Levy, P. and Lemeshow, S. (1991). Sampling of
    Populations. John Wiley Sons.
  • Ramsey, S. et al (2005). Using GIS and GPS to
    Improve Public Health Response. Guilford County,
    NC Health Department Public Health Regional
    Surveillance Team 5.
  • Rubin, HJ and Rubin, IS.  (1995). Interviews as
    Guided Conversations. Qualitative Interviewing
    The Art of Hearing Data. Sage Publications, pp.
    1-16, 122-144.
  • Salant, P. and Dillman, D. (1994). How to
    Conduct Your Own Survey. John Wiley Sons.

139
References and Resources
  • Stehr-Green, J.K. (2002). Gastroenteritis at a
    University in Texas Case Study Instructors
    Guide. Atlanta, GA U.S. Department of Health
    and Human Services, Public Health Service,
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  • U.S. Census Bureau (2005). Profile of Selected
    Housing Characteristics by State Census 2000
    Summary File 3 http//factfinder.census.gov/servle
    t/QTTable?_bmn_langenqr_nameDEC_2000_SF3_U_DP
    4ds_nameDEC_2000_SF3_Ugeo_id04000US51
  • Weiss, R.S. (1994). Learning from Strangers The
    Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies.
    New York The Free Press.
  • Wiggins, B. and Deeb-Sossa, N. (2000).
    Conducting Telephone Surveys. Chapel Hill, NC
    Odum Institute for Research in Social Science.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com