National Trauma Data Standard: Everything youve wanted to know but have been afraid to ask - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

National Trauma Data Standard: Everything youve wanted to know but have been afraid to ask

Description:

Characterize all patient care. Provide baseline measures for enhancing disaster preparedness ... Characterize treatment and outcome. Assess trauma systems attributes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:101
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: cma72
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: National Trauma Data Standard: Everything youve wanted to know but have been afraid to ask


1
National Trauma Data Standard Everything youve
wanted to know but have been afraid to ask!
N. Clay Mann, PhD, MS
2
Objectives
  • Need for a National Registry
  • The State of State Registries
  • Variability in Data Quality
  • Development of the NTDS
  • Implementation of NTDS

3
Need for a National Registry
  • Provide a national resource for clinical
    benchmarking, process improvement, and patient
    safety
  • Characterize all patient care
  • Provide baseline measures for enhancing disaster
    preparedness
  • Develop better injury scoring and outcome
    measures
  • This is not necessarily surveillance

4
States with Statewide Registries
Planning CA, DC, ID, KY, LA, ME, MA, MI, NE,
NM, TN, WV, WI
Technical Difficulties ND, SD
No Plans HI, IN, NH, NJ, RI, VT
5
States with Registries
  • 27/32 require hospitals to report
  • 11 statesall acute care hospitals
  • 15 statesonly designated centers
  • 1 stateonly participating hospitals
  • 5/32 request hospitals report
  • 2 statesall acute care hospitals
  • 1 stateonly designated centers
  • 2 statespartial registries

6
Variation in Case Acquisition
7
Threats to Data Integrity
  • Mandatory/elective Submission
  • Completeness of Case Capture
  • Difference in Case Definition
  • Difference in Coding Conventions

8
Are Registries Comparable?
9
Variability in Case Definition
  • Inclusion Criteria Number
    Exclusion Criteria Number
  • Abuse 4
    Abuse 3
  • Blisters, contusions, Blisters, contusions,
  • abrasions 3
    abrasions 11
  • Drowning 13 Drowning 15
  • Smoke inhalation 7 Smoke inhalation
    2
  • Foreign bodies 5 Foreign bodies
    17
  • High altitude sickness 0 High altitude
    sickness 1
  • Lightning 5 Lightning
    0
  • Same level fall 2 Same level fall
    18
  • Poisoning 2 Poisoning 13

10
Variability in Case Definition
  • Variability in same-level fall exclusion
  • Same level fall AND age gt 55 yrs old
  • Same level fall AND age gt 65 yrs old
  • Same level fall AND isolated hip fracture (ICD-9
    820)
  • Same level fall AND fracture of the vertebral
    column (ICD-9 805)
  • Same Level fall AND isolated fracture of the
    pelvis (ICD-9 808.2)
  • Same level fall AND superficial injury (ICD-9
    910-924)
  • Same level fall AND age gt 65 yrs old AND isolated
    hip fracture (ICD-9 820)
  • Same level fall AND age gt 65 yrs old AND isolated
    extremity fracture (no ICD-9 codes listed)

11
Variability in Coding Conventions
Glasgow Coma Score in ED
  • 15 states..initial GCS
  • 8 states..initial and last GCS
  • 1 state...worst GCS
  • 1 state best GCS
  • 1 state..initial and worst GCS

12
Variability in Coding Conventions
Time of Injury
  • Coding Convention Number of States
  • Report Not documented 10
  • Report EMS dispatch time 8
  • Report 5 minutes prior to EMS dispatch time
    2
  • Report 15 minutes prior to EMS dispatch time
    1
  • Report 5 to 20 minutes prior to EMS dispatch time
  • depending on call location and general scene
    info 1
  • Report EMS dispatch time only if MVC 1
  • Report EMS arrival time 1
  • Report in categories (lt 1 hour, 1-6 hours,
  • 7-12 hours, 13-24 hours, or gt24 hours)
    1

13
Data Needs for Registries
  • All States with Trauma Registries
  • Complete Data Capture
  • Common Subset of Variables
  • Uniform Data Definitions and Values
  • Standardized Coding Conventions
  • Common Definition of Injury
  • Uniform Inclusion Criteria

14
Existing National Registry
  • Annual Report
  • NTDB Pediatric Report
  • NTDB Slide Kits
  • Hospital Benchmark Reports
  • Trauma Center Data Report Cards
  • ACS Bulletin Articles

15
  • 2007
  • NTDB contains over 2.7 million records
  • From 900 US trauma centers
  • Annual Report Version 7.0 released

16
National Trauma Data Standard
2.2
17
The Bank The Currency
18
National Trauma Data Standard
  • Standard Inclusion Criteria
  • Standard Data Definitions
  • Standard Source Hierarchy
  • Standard Comorbidities
  • Pediatric specific additions
  • Auto-Calculated Fields
  • Edit Checks
  • The Validator

19
Ensuring Common Variables
  • Common Subset of Variables
  • Evaluate variable frequency across registries
  • Consider importance at national level
  • Seek consensus from experts

20
(No Transcript)
21
Variable Schema
Primary Variable
Supportive Variable
Autogenerated Variable
Secondary Variable
22
Auto-generated Variables
  • FIPS - like code (location code)
  • Trauma Type (blunt, penetrating, burn)
  • Injury Intentionality (using CDC matrix)
  • Total EMS Response Time
  • Total EMS Scene Time
  • Total EMS Time
  • Revised Trauma Score in the Prehospital Setting
    (adult and pediatric)
  • Revised Trauma Score in ED (adult and pediatric)
  • Abbreviated Injury Scale (six body regions)
  • Injury Severity Score
  • International Classification Injury Severity
    Score
  • Functional Capacity Index
  • Total ED Time
  • Total Length of Hospital Stay

23
(No Transcript)
24
Choosing Inclusion Criteria
  • Uniform Inclusion Criteria
  • Collect all state inclusion/exclusion criteria
  • Assess criteria for commonalities
  • Look for least common denominator?

States
Criterion
25
NTDS Inclusion Criteria
26
Improving Data Quality
27
NTDS Edit Checks
28
Development of the Validator
29
National Trauma Data Standard
THE VALIDATOR
Hasta La Vista Bad Data
30
(No Transcript)
31
Benefit of a Common XML
NTDB
NEMSIS
32
Improving Data Usability
33
On Line Data Submission
34
Facility Demographics
  • Expanded Facility information screens
  • Hospital type
  • Hospital teaching status
  • Verification level
  • Bed Inventory
  • Inclusion criteria
  • Transfers in or out
  • Age of pediatric patients
  • Comorbidities and complications
  • Number of registrars
  • Number of surgeons
  • Software product utilized

35
Verification Requirement
  • Annual NTDB participation
  • Officially in effect with new green book
  • Centers received waivers in 2007 as needed
  • Year round data submission started in 2008

36
Data Submission
37
Call for Data
  • 2008
  • First NTDB call for data based on NTDS version
    1.2
  • Map current registry fields to the new standard
  • 2009
  • Second NTDB call for data based on NTDS version
    1.2
  • Updated software from vendors that incorporates
    all the new data fields and allows for direct
    data entry.

38
We need your support!
  • National Trauma Data Standard will
  • Allow for seamless participation in NTDB
  • Describe severe trauma nationally
  • Characterize treatment and outcome
  • Assess trauma systems attributes
  • Link to standardized EMS data
  • Vendors are also interested in your commitment!

39
Tasks Seem Overwhelming?
40
Technical Assistance
  • Visit the website
  • Join the NTDS Google Group
  • Talk with your software vendors
  • Utilize resources at the ACS and NEMSIS TAC

41
www.ntdsdictionary.org/
42
Join the NTDS Google Group!
43
www.ntdb.org
44
For More Information
  • www.ntdb.org
  • www.ntdsdictionary.org
  • www.ntdbdatacenter.com

45
Additional Questions
  • Contact
  • N. Clay Mann
  • clay.mann_at_hsc.utah.edu
  • (801) 585-9161
  • Melanie Neal
  • MNeal_at_facs.org
  • (312) 202-5536

46
How do we get here from there?
47
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com