Philosophy and Cogsci - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Philosophy and Cogsci

Description:

Turing's biographer Andrew Hodges : http://www.turing.com/turing/Turing.html. Computation theory. Book : Boolos and Jeffrey's Computability and Logic ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: joel92
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Philosophy and Cogsci


1
Philosophy and Cogsci
  • The Turing Test
  • Joe Lau

2
Alan Turing (1912-1954)
  • Famous British mathematician / logician
  • Mathematical theory of computation.
  • Helped cracked the German U-boat Enigma code in
    WWII.
  • A homosexual, arrested in 1952.
  • Committed suicide.

3
More information
  • More on Turings life
  • Turings biographer Andrew Hodges
    http//www.turing.com/turing/Turing.html
  • Computation theory
  • Book Boolos and Jeffreys Computability and
    Logic
  • Article in Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy
    (web)

4
Topic
  • 1950 paper in Mind Computing Machinery and
    Intelligence
  • Introduced computers to philosophy
  • Argued for the plausibility of thinking machines
  • Proposed Turing test often cited as criterion
    of success for AI.

5
Turings Proposal
  • The question Can machines think? is too vague.
  • What are machines?
  • What is thinking?
  • Replace by
  • Can computers pass the imitation game?

6
The Imitation Game
  • Judge talks to a man and woman through teletype
    and has to decide which is which.
  • Turing What if the man is replaced by a
    computer?
  • Passing the test the judge cannot do better
    than guessing.

7
What is the test for?
  • What is the purpose?
  • One proposal provides a (behavioral) definition
    of thinking
  • Probably not
  • Turing thought that the question of whether
    machines can think is too meaningless to deserve
    discussion.

8
A bad definition anyway
  • Definition X ABC
  • In a correct definition, ABC are the necessary
    and sufficient conditions for X.
  • Passing the test is neither necessary nor
    sufficient for thinking.

9
Passing not necessary
  • Things that think, but which fail the test
  • Systems that can think but cannot communicate
    with a language, or too shy or paranoid to do so.
  • The judge might be a computer expert who can
    detect subtle hints.

10
Turing on clever judges
  • Turing recognized an objection similar to the
    last point.
  • He said that "we need not be troubled" as long as
    there are machines that can pass the test.
  • So he did concede that passing the test is not
    necessary for being able to think.

11
Also not sufficient
  • Things that cannot think, but pass the test
  • Blockhead a stupid machine that stores all
    possible conversations within some limited
    duration.
  • Blockhead is logically possible, but not
    practically possible.

12
Blockhead
  • Ned Block The Mind as the Software of the Brain

All possible opening lines from the judge
All possible replies
13
Proposal
  • The test is a practical sufficiency test for
    intelligent thinking.
  • Often taken as a practical goal for AI.
  • Allows for thinking computers that fail the test.

14
Other issues
  • Problems with judges
  • Who can be a judge? What if a computer passes the
    test because of a stupid judge?

15
Real tests
  • The Loeber Prize
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com