Title: Using Key Performance Indicators to Prepare for Contract Renegotiation
1Edison Club Rexford, New York Tuesday 30 June
2009
Using Key Performance Indicators to Prepare for
Contract Renegotiation
David Hammer VP, Revenue Cycle Solutions
McKesson Fort Lauderdale, Florida
2Contents
- KPIs Definition / Purposes / Benefits
- Contracting Cycle Definition
- Revenue Cycle Definition
- Contracting KPIs
- Level I, II, III, and IV Rev Cycle KPIs
- Rev Cycle KPIs by Contract-Related Area
1
3Contents
- Denials and Underpayments
- Information Technology
- Operationalizing Contracts
- Group Exercise
- Call to Action
- Presenters Resume
2
4Wheres Your Focus?
3
5Whats Going On in This Picture?
Tiger Woods Masters Golf Tournament
4
6Even the Very Best Keep Score
- In business, words are words, explanations are
explanations, promises are promises, but only
performance is reality.Harold S. Geneen - Former President and CEO of ITT
5
7Even the Very Best Keep Score
- If you cant measure it, you cant manage it.
- Michael Bloomberg
- Mayor of New York City and CEO of Bloomberg, Inc.
6
8Lets Define Terms
- Key Performance Indicators
7
9What is a KPI?
- Numerical factor
- Quantitatively measures performance
- Activities, volumes, etc.
- Business and/or clinical processes
- Insurance plans or payor contracts
- Financial assets
- Functional groups
- Service lines
- The entire enterprise
- Source BearingPoint, Key Performance Indicators
8
8
10Purposes of KPIs
- View performance snapshots, at various levels
- Individual / Insurance plan
- Group / payor
- Department / service line
- Hospital
- Region
- Assess current situation and determine root
causes of identified problem areas
9
9
11Purposes of KPIs (cont)
- Set goals, expectations, and financial incentives
for any individual, group, or contract - Trend the performance of the selected individual,
group, or contract over time - Source BearingPoint, Key Performance Indicators
10
10
12Purposes of KPIs (cont)
- Keep a record and tell a story
- Benchmark against your goals and industry better
practices - Identify and manage trends, not single-period
results - Illustrate relationships between KPIs
11
13Benefits of Using KPIs
- Increase management awareness
- Focus attention on improvement opportunities
- Increasing Contribution Margin
- Developing Best Practices
- Improving / Accelerating Management Reporting
- Monitoring Payor Performance
- Increasing Cash Flow
- Improving Clinical Quality
- Reducing Costs
- Identifying Problem Areas
- Benchmarking
- Illustrating Trends
- Scoring Performance
- Reducing Denials
12
12
Source BearingPoint, Key Performance Indicators
14Lets Define Terms
13
15Contracting Cycle Definition
1. Provide patients 4. Pay claims
2. Treat patients 3. Submit claims
14
16Contracting Cycle Definition
Reduce Payor Discretion
Achieve Target Margins
15
17Contracting Cycle Definition
Analyze Service Lines
Analyze Contract Performance
Collect Accounts Post Payments
Analyze Financial Needs
Work Denials Payment Variances
ProfitableContracts
Understand Competitors Market
Submit Follow-up Claims
Understand Payors Their Reputations
Analyze Steerage vs. Discounts
Define Payors Providers Duties
Negotiate Contract Language Rates
16
18Contracting Cycle
- Strategy development
- Strategy implementation
- Contract negotiations
- Contract evaluation
- Forecasting and analysis
- Contract implementation and operations
- Performance monitoring
- Strategic issues and planning
Source Stevenson, Paul B., Managed Care Cycle
Provides Contract Oversight, hfm, Mar 2002
17
19Lets Define Terms
18
20Revenue Cycle Definition
Collection
Pricing
Denials Payment Variance
Payor Negotiation Renegotiation
CashPosting
Follow-up
Registration
Billing
Authorization Certification
Coding
Financial Counseling
19
21Understanding the Processes
Upstream Processes
20
22Understanding the Processes
Midstream Processes
21
23Understanding the Processes
Downstream Processes
22
24Understanding the Processes
Associated Processes
23
25Understanding the ProcessesRev Cycle Complete
Picture
24
26Contracting KPIs
25
27Contracting KPIs
26
28Contracting KPIs
27
29Contracting KPIs
Source Managed Care Forum Contracting
Checklist, HFMA Wants You to Know, 21 Apr 2004
28
30Contracting KPIs
Source Managed Care Forum Contracting
Checklist, HFMA Wants You to Know, 21 Apr 2004
29
31Contracting KPIs
Source Managed Care Forum Contracting
Checklist, HFMA Wants You to Know, 21 Apr 2004
30
32Contracting KPIs
Source Managed Care Forum Contracting
Checklist, HFMA Wants You to Know, 21 Apr 2004
31
33Contracting KPIs
Source Managed Care Forum Contracting
Checklist, HFMA Wants You to Know, 21 Apr 2004
32
34Contracting KPIs
Source Managed Care Forum Contracting
Checklist, HFMA Wants You to Know, 21 Apr 2004
33
35Contracting KPIs
Source 15 Questions to Ask Before Signing a
Managed Care Contract, Private Sector Advocacy,
Dec 2002
34
36Contracting KPIs
Source 15 Questions to Ask Before Signing a
Managed Care Contract, Private Sector Advocacy,
Dec 2002
35
37Contracting KPIs
Source Wilson, David B., 3 Steps to Profitable
Managed Care Contracts, hfm, May 2004
36
38Contracting KPIs
Source Wilson, David B., 3 Steps to Profitable
Managed Care Contracts, hfm, May 2004
37
39Contracting KPIs
Source Wilson, David B., 3 Steps to Profitable
Managed Care Contracts, hfm, May 2004
38
40Contracting KPIs
Source Wilson, David B., 3 Steps to Profitable
Managed Care Contracts, hfm, May 2004
39
41Contracting KPIs
Source Wilson, David B., 3 Steps to Profitable
Managed Care Contracts, hfm, May 2004
40
42Contracting KPIs
Source Miller, Thomas R., Conducting a Managed
Care Contract Review, hfm, Jan 1998
41
43Contracting KPIs
Source Miller, Thomas R., Conducting a Managed
Care Contract Review, hfm, Jan 1998
42
44Contracting KPIs
Source Miller, Thomas R., Conducting a Managed
Care Contract Review, hfm, Jan 1998
43
45Contracting KPIs
Source Miller, Thomas R., Conducting a Managed
Care Contract Review, hfm, Jan 1998
44
46Contracting KPIs
Source Miller, Thomas R., Conducting a Managed
Care Contract Review, hfm, Jan 1998
45
47Contracting KPIs
Source Managing Your Managed Care, HFMA-NC
Tarheel News
46
48Rev Cycle KPI Hierarchy
47
49KPI Hierarchy Level 1 Indicators
- Cash collections
- Gross and net receivables
- Payor aging gt 90 days
- Cash of net revenue
- Cost to collect
48
50Cash Collections 1st Level
49
51Gross A / R 1st Level
50
52Net A / R 1st Level
51
53Payor Aging gt90 1st Level
52
54Cash of Net Rev 1st Level
53
55Cost-to-Collect 1st Level
54
56KPI Hierarchy Level 2 Indicators
- Net A/R days
- Denials of gross revenue
- Cash of collection goal
- Point-of-service cash of goal
55
57Net A / R Days 2nd Level
56
58Denials of Gross Rev 2nd Level
57
59Cash of Cash Goal 2nd Level
58
60P-O-S Cash of Goal 2nd Level
59
61KPI Hierarchy Level 3 Indicators
- Credit balance receivables
- Clean claims throughput
- Net revenue
- Case mix index (CMI)
- Open accounts
60
62Credit-Balance A / R 3rd Level
61
63Clean Claim 3rd Level
62
64Net Revenue 3rd Level
63
65Case Mix Index 3rd Level
64
66Total Open Accounts 3rd Level
65
67Payor Scorecard
- Financial Indicators
- Cash Collections Indicators
- Denials and Appeals Indicators
66
68Payor Scorecard
67
69KPI Hierarchy Level 4 Indicators
- By Major Payor Category or Plan Code
- of Total A/R gt60 Days
- of A/R gt35 Days (No Pmt, No Response)
- of A/R in Underpaid Category
- of A/R in Appeal Status
- of A/R in Overpaid Category
68
7069
7170
7271
7372
74Rev Cycle KPIs by Area
73
75Rev Cycle KPIs by Area Pre-Registration /
Pre-Authorization
74
76Rev Cycle KPIs by Area Pre-Reg / Pre-Auth
(contd)
75
77Rev Cycle KPIs by Area Insurance Verification
76
78Rev Cycle KPIs by Area Insurance Verification
(contd)
77
79Rev Cycle KPIs by Area 3rd-Party Guarantor
Follow-Up
78
80Rev Cycle KPIs by Area 3rd-Party Guarantor F-U
(contd)
79
81Rev Cycle KPIs by Area 3rd-Party Guarantor F-U
(contd)
80
82KPIs by Functional Area3rd-Party Guarantor F-U
(contd)
81
83KPIs by Functional Area3rd-Party Guarantor F-U
(contd)
82
84KPIs by Functional AreaCashiering / Refunds /
Adj Posting
83
85KPIs by Functional AreaCashiering / Refunds /
Adjs (contd)
84
86KPIs by Functional AreaCashiering / Refunds /
Adjs (contd)
85
87Rev Cycle KPIs by Area Denials
86
88Rev Cycle KPIs by Area Denials (contd)
87
89Rev Cycle KPIs by Area Denials (contd)
88
90Rev Cycle KPIs by Area Denials (contd)
89
91Rev Cycle KPIs by Area Denials (contd)
90
92Dont Be in Denial About...
91
93Denials Underpayments How Much is Lost Every
Year?
Total Hospital Denials (as of total hospital
cases)
Total Hospital Underpayments (as of total
hospital cases)
Total Revenue Opportunity 3.3 Million
1.7 Madditionalrevenue
1.6 Madditionalrevenue
CurrentPractice
BestPractice
CurrentPractice
BestPractice
Source Health Care Advisory Board
92
94Denials Underpayments How Much is Lost Every
Year?
Self Pay Bad Debt 12
Denials 41
Underpayments 47
Source Health Care Advisory Board, Zimmerman
Associates, HFMA, and McKesson customers
experience. Based on hospitals with average
payor mix.
93
95Denials Underpayments Sources of Denials
- 41 - Authorization
- 19 - Eligibility
- 19 - Medical Necessity
- 15 - Documentation
- 6 - Billing
80 of errors resulting in denials occur during
the up-stream patient access processes
94
96Denials Underpayments Good News!
Percentage of Preventable Denials
Source Health Care Advisory Board
95
97Denials Underpayments Common Denial Problems
- High denial rates and associated write offs
- Slow and inefficient MD communications
- Time-consuming manual pre-service processes
- Rising self-pay bad debt (25 billion in 2004)
96
98Denials Underpayments Common Denial Problems
- Inefficient and time-consuming patient and
insurance data collection - Invalid patient ID and address info returned
mail (6 15) - Manual, paper based document collection and
retrieval
97
99Denials Underpayments Common Payor Denial
Reasons
- Service / procedure payment reduced
- Multiple units paid as one unit
- Patient not covered on date of service
- Services not covered
- Not medically necessary
- Not reasonable
- Specifically excluded
- Elective or patient convenience
98
100Denials Underpayments Common Payor Denial
Reasons
- Duplicate / previously paid claim
- Bundling / unbundling error
- Modifier not provided
- Procedure code mismatches
- vs. services provided
- vs. patients gender
- vs. modifier / place of service
- Diagnosis vs. age / gender / procedure
99
101Denials Underpayments Common Denial Problem
Indicators
- Average net revenue per case declining
- Many denials simply written off
- No feedback loop to responsible areas
- No ability to identify current status
- Total denials ( and )
- Denials by payor
- Denials by reason
100
102Denials Underpayments Best Practice Strategies
- Create standard definitions (use HIPAAs)
- Use root cause analysis
- Apply the 80/20 rule focus on high
- Use prospective prevention
- Denial management task force
- Trending and education
- Remittance monitoring / management
- Accountability fix where broken
101
103Denials Underpayments Best Practice Strategies
- Good documentation
- Accurate procedures
- Well-educated employees in all relevant
departments - Front-end resolution / prevention
102
104Denials Underpayments Best Practice Strategies
- Identify coordinator for the process
- Understand and meet deadlines
- Build relationships at your payors
- Analyze denials and target appeals
- Prepare appeal letters
- Clinicians / MDs for medical necessity
- Managed care department for technical
- Track results
103
105Denials Underpayments Best Practice Strategies
- Deploy standardized, best practice operating
models - Leverage existing HIS infrastructure
- Define performance expectations and productivity
indicators - Use exception reporting for performance
management and timely issue resolution - Create management- and executive-level
performance monitoring tools and tracking reports
104
106Denials Underpayments Best Practice Strategies
- Integrate responsibility for achieving financial
results - Instill accountability through on-going
performance tracking and reporting - Align specialized resources to ensure
- Knowledge transfer effective implementation
- Change management
- Focus on increasing cash and net revenue
105
107Denials Underpayments Overall Total Solution
- OVERALL Best Practice Model Components
- Defined roles, responsibilities, and
organizational structure for denial management - Consistent process for registration results
- Integrated technology between clinical and
revenue cycle process areas - Referral management, insurance verification,
pre-certification, and authorization protocols - Access to accurate payor requirements and
criteria - Knowledgeable employees regarding medical
necessity - Accurate diagnosis and procedure coding
- Standardized denial classifications and
definitions - Accurate and up-to-date denial tracking and
reporting - Concurrent management of inpatient denials
- Policies and procedures for concurrent and
retrospective denial processing - Active physician advisor
- Standard protocols for appeals processing
- Payor-specific initiatives for high volume payors
- Consistent monitoring of write-offs and revenue
loss due to avoidable denials - Defined and structured underpayment recovery
program - Accountability for key performance indicators
- Technology Enablers
- Receivables WorkStation
- Remittance Posting System
- Contract Management System
- Imaging System
- KPI Reporting System
106
108Denials Underpayments Patient Access Total
Solution
- PATIENT ACCESS Best Practice Model Components
- Defined guidelines and workflow tools for
consistency in data capture, financial screening,
admission, and discharge planning - Access to accurate payor requirements and
criteria - Pre-service activities performed simultaneously,
including pre-registration, insurance
verification, and patient financial counseling - On-line/real time referrals, insurance
verification, pre-authorization, address
checking, and credit scoring - Knowledgeable employees regarding medical
necessity, levels of care, and ABN requirements - Delay/deny policy for non-covered, non-emergent
cases - Self pay portions identified and collected prior
to or at time of service - Patient history reviewed for financial counseling
needs - Standardized performance measures for each
employee level and function - Quality assurance monitoring program
- Workflow integration, on-going communication, and
collaboration between Patient Access and Case
Management
- Technology Enablers
- Scheduling System
- Compliance System
- Eligibility System
- Address / Credit-Check System
- Imaging System
- KPI Reporting System
107
109Denials Underpayments D-N-F-B Management Total
Solution
- D-N-F-B MGT Best Practice Model Components
- Timely and accurate documentation of procedures
and diagnoses in medical record - Updated Charge Description Master (CDM) for
additions and changes to HCPCS, CPT-4, and UB-92
revenue codes - Records of discharged/departed patients available
to Health Information Management (HIM) within 24
hours - Reconciliation efforts completed daily with an
escalation process for missing records - A FIFO (first in, first out) workload
distribution in place supplemented by
prioritizing high dollar accounts during backlog
periods - Clinical reports electronically available to
coders - 95 of coders productive time spent on coding
and abstracting analysis and chart completion
are performed by non-coders - Documentation issues trended and addressed
concurrently - Transcription turnaround time complements timely
coding - Standardized performance measures in place for
each employee level and function in HIM department
- Technology Enablers
- Imaging System
- KPI Reporting System
108
110Denials Underpayments Billing Total Solution
- BILLING Best Practice Model Components
- Maximum use of payor-specific and correct coding
edits - Claim-edit bill holds cleared within one day
- Properly identified covered and non-covered
charges - Corrective action and resolution of identified
billing errors - Standardized and automated initial, secondary,
and tertiary billing processes - Standard and timely processes for obtaining
payor-mandated attachments - Documentation on payor contracts terms,
conditions, and regulations consistently updated
and available for employee use - Contract management software used to net down
A/R down to expected reimbursement amounts - Accountability for key performance indicators
- Ongoing employee training and education regarding
billing regulations - Communication of data collection, charge capture,
and medical records issues
- Technology Enablers
- Contract Management System
- Compliance System
- Electronic Billing System
- Imaging System
- KPI Reporting System
109
111Denials Underpayments Follow-Up Collection
Total Solution
- FOLLOW-UP Best Practice Model Components
- Full use of automated collector workfiles, based
on payor-specific follow-up criteria and
timeframes - On-line/real time insurance follow-up status
checking - Electronic documentation of all insurance and
responsible party interaction, in standard note
formats - Tracking of documentation / medical record
requests - Electronic payment and remittance posting
- Continuous monitoring of payments received
against payor contract terms and expected
reimbursement - Ready access to all EOB, remittance, and patient
payment documentation - Timely response to telephone and correspondence
inquiries - Integrated denial management activities
- Monitoring and maintaining appropriate
authorization levels for write-offs - Defined and structured underpayment recovery
program - Accountability for key performance indicators
- Technology Enablers
- Receivables WorkStation
- Remittance Posting System
- Contract Management System
- Imaging System
- KPI Reporting System
110
112I.T. A Good Workman... Never Blames
the Tools
111
113Information Technology Bolt-On Systems
- According to research by PwC, providers using
revenue cycle bolt-on technology achieve better
results in - First-pass yield in billing
- Days in accounts receivable
- Percent of accounts greater than 90 days from
date-of-service - Secondary billing speed and accuracy
- Regulatory compliance
- Harris, Turning Your Revenue Cycle Into a Hot Rod
Using Bolt-On Technology, HFMA ANI 2004
112
114Information Technology Bolt-On Systems
- Denial management
- Claims edits and error checking
- Document imaging / scanning
- Contract management
- Automated authorization and pre-cert
- Electronic eligibility verification
- Utilization review tracking
- Address and credit check
- Pre-bill edit
113
115Information Technology Bolt-On Systems
- Prompt payment / interest calculation
- Receivables workstation
- Predictive dialer
- Returned mail address locator
- 3rd-party follow-up via Internet
- Outpatient and OR scheduling
- MPI duplicates control
- Electronic scrip (pre-svc automation)
114
116Information Technology Bolt-On Systems
Compliance
- Operates in real time to identify services not
covered by payors - Produces Advance Beneficiary Notices (ABNs), or
equivalent, for patient liability - Audits clinical codes before claim submission
- Offers multi-million comprehensive local and
national edits, with monthly updates
115
117Information Technology Bolt-On Systems
Contract Mgt
- Contracting module identifies denials and
underpayments - Produces reports to assist with collections
- Allows what-if analysis for new contracts
- Offers two-way integration with core HIS systems
- Provides national library of contract terms, to
ensure calculations are correct / reliable
116
118Information Technology Bolt-On Systems
Electronic Claims
- Identifies and corrects errors on-line, providing
clean claims - Flags administrative / clinical coding errors
- Two-way integration with core HIS systems saves
updating time, ensures data integrity - Electronic claim submission via central
clearinghouses eliminates the need to maintain
multiple payor connections
117
119Information Technology Bolt-On Systems
Electronic Remits
- Aids retrieval of electronic remittance files
from payors - Translates payors proprietary electronic
remittance file formats to ANSI 835 format
required for transaction posting - Enables denial management follow up and reporting
with KPIs reporting module
118
120Information Technology Bolt-On Systems A/R
WorkStation
- Provides single-point access for billing and
collection follow-up activities - Improves productivity via management-defined work
queues - Consolidates multiple sources of claim
information - Reduces cost of collections and claim follow-up
119
121Information Technology Bolt-On Systems
Denials Analysis
- Has built-in web-based GUI reports on payors
contract performance and denial history - Offers centralized repository of denial info, for
pinpointing and quantifying denial problems - Normalizes data across payors
- Measures follow-up success and tracks recoveries
120
122Information Technology Bolt-On Systems
Decision Support
- Consolidates financial and clinical data
- Performs profitability analyses and what if
scenarios to support payor negotiations - Supports Medicare Cost Report and state-mandated
reporting - Highlights key performance measures
- Provides web-based interactive analysis
121
123Information Technology Bolt-On Systems Exec
Info System
- Highlights key performance indicators
- Provides web-based interactive analysis with
drill-down capability - Consolidates financial and clinical data
- Performs profitability analyses and what-if
scenarios - Sends alerts and e-mail notifications, based on
pre-selected criteria
122
124Operationalizing Contracts
123
125Operationalizing Contracts Opportunities for
Improvement
- Denial management 50
- Cash acceleration 25
- Patient / guarantor collections 10
- 3rd-party payment accuracy 10
- Vendor contract coordination 5
- Source Guyton Lund, Healthcare Financial
Management, Mar 2003
124
126Operationalizing Contracts Opportunities for
Improvement
- Denials management 50
- Enhance authorization and certification
- Implement concurrent UR
- Document care completely and timely
- Improve registration data quality
- Implement concurrent coding
- Source Guyton Lund, Healthcare Financial
Management, Mar 2003
125
127Operationalizing Contracts Opportunities for
Improvement
- Cash acceleration 25
- Target large-balance accounts (leverage effect)
- Focus on over-90 accounts (outsource or bad debt)
- Re-deploy billers as collectors (automate claims
submission) - Automate follow-up (receivables workstation)
- Source Guyton Lund, Healthcare Financial
Management, Mar 2003
126
128Operationalizing Contracts Opportunities for
Improvement
- Patient / guarantor collections 10
- Implement point-of-service collection polices
train employees to ask for - Offer patient payment options (credit cards and
bank loan financing) - Accelerate self-pay follow-up process and
statements (predictive dialer) - Consider outsourcing to gain technology and
staffing leverage - Source Guyton Lund, Healthcare Financial
Management, Mar 2003
127
129Operationalizing Contracts Opportunities for
Improvement
- 3rd-party payment accuracy 10
- Implement contract management system
- Deploy specialized underpayment collectors
- Simplify contract terms
- Define thresholds of materiality for
underpayments (IP vs. OP) - Source Guyton Lund, Healthcare Financial
Management, Mar 2003
128
130Operationalizing Contracts Opportunities for
Improvement
- Vendor contract coordination 5
- Evaluate outpartner contract terms
- Enhance / intensify contract management and
performance evaluation - Coordinate RFP process to ensure optimum pricing
and service levels - Improve or implement technology integration
- Source Guyton Lund, Healthcare Financial
Management, Mar 2003
129
131Operationalizing Contracts Guiding Principles
for Improvement
- Reduced variability
- Implement common infrastructure and management
- Monitor registration data quality address
variances that result in denials - Proactively challenge payment denials and
underpayments - Measure and monitor back-end operations
- Source Guyton Lund, Healthcare Financial
Management, Mar 2003
130
132Operationalizing Contracts Guiding Principles
for Improvement
- Better information management
- Aggressively maintain CDM, MPI, contract matrix,
and insurance master - Ensure adequate and complete clinical and
collection documentation, to support payment - Leverage knowledge, insight, and clinical results
in scheduling, authorization, and
pre-certification processes - Source Guyton Lund, Healthcare Financial
Management, Mar 2003
131
133Operationalizing Contracts Guiding Principles
for Improvement
- Comprehensive integration
- Maintain and enforce common policies and
processes - Implement technology to automate workflow and
accelerate productivity - Leverage outpartner relationships and align
common incentives - Source Guyton Lund, Healthcare Financial
Management, Mar 2003
132
134Operationalizing Contracts Guiding Principles
for Improvement
- Pre-certification / pre-authorization
- On-line LMRP / CCI / medical necessity screening
- Process for obtaining ED / observation
authorizations - Fax server and/or on-line payor linkages
- Seven day per week operations
- Source Guyton Lund, Healthcare Financial
Management, Mar 2003
133
135Operationalizing Contracts Guiding Principles
for Improvement
- Insurance Eligibility Verification
- Payor-specific protocols
- Detailed, on-line insurance matrix
- Contract terms, exclusions , etc.
- Verification, certification, billing info
- Eligibility red-flag questionnaires
- On-line verification tools
- Source Guyton Lund, Healthcare Financial
Management, Mar 2003
134
136Operationalizing Contracts Guiding Principles
for Improvement
- Continued-stay certification / UR
- Dedicated employees trained about revenue cycle
implications - Coordinated communication about payor criteria
and/or denials with MDs - Automated certification renewal alerts
- Continuous monitoring of observation patients
- Seven day per week operations
- Source Guyton Lund, Healthcare Financial
Management, Mar 2003
135
137Operationalizing Contracts Guiding Principles
for Improvement
- Claim submission / billing
- Automated payor-specific and correct-coding edits
- Maximization of electronic submission
- Automated secondary / supplemental claim
submission - Standard and timely submission of payor-mandated
claim attachments - Source Guyton Lund, Healthcare Financial
Management, Mar 2003
136
138Operationalizing Contracts Guiding Principles
for Improvement
- Denials management cross-functional
- Maximizing denials reversal rates
- Automated managed care management system,
integrated with host patient accounting system - Denials management database
- Dedicated unit with no competing duties
- Source Healthcare Advisory Board, 2001
137
139Operationalizing Contracts Guiding Principles
for Improvement
- Denials management cross-functional (cont)
- Hardwiring verification / authorization
- Eligibility red flags questionnaires
- Physician authorization protocols
- Daily pre-certification fax notification to
high-volume payors - Dedicated authorization clerk(s)
- Source Healthcare Advisory Board, 2001
138
140Operationalizing Contracts Guiding Principles
for Improvement
- Denials management cross-functional (cont)
- Ensuring correct clinical documentation
- Real-time medical necessity software
- Medical-necessity DRG help sheets
- One-page CCs checklists in charts
- MD clinical documentation advisors
- Minimizing payor discretion through comprehensive
contract review - Source Healthcare Advisory Board, 2001
139
141Wheres Your Focus?
140
142Group-Work Exercise
141
143Group Exercise Things to Do
- Compare your contracting KPI standards and
processes to those on pages 25 - 44 - Do you even measure most of these KPIs?
- If so, how do you compare to these standards?
142
144Group Exercise Things to Do
- Consider the following questions
- How hard would it be to obtain this info in your
organization? - How would you use the info, if you had it?
- Do you have to pull info, or is it pushed to
users?
143
145Group Exercise Things to Do
- Do the best you can in the available time
- If youre a consultant (you know who you are),
use redacted (anonymous) client data - Be creative think outside the box
- Expect to have fun and meet new colleagues
144
146In Conclusion, A Call to Action!
145
147A Call to Action!
- How do you start?
- Open the discussion
- Take time to define / refine KPIs
- Gain consensus and commitment
146
148A Call to Action!
- How do you use KPIs to enact change?
- Understand processes that generate KPIs
- Create a culture of accountability and reward
- Continuously adapt and iterate
147
149A Call to Action!
- Reduce complexity simplify your work
- View key indicators that provide early warnings
- Maintain personal involvement in critical areas
- Access a mix of early-warning and historical data
148
150A Call to Action!
- How do we enter data?
- How do we get reports?
- How do we use information to evaluate and
renegotiate contracts? - When / why are things out-of-control?
- What do we do next?
149
151A Call to Action!
- Open / frame the discussion 5
- Define / refine KPIs 50
- Gain consensus / commitment 10
- Demand accountability / reward results 25
- Continuously adapt and iterate 10
- Achieve results! 100
150
152Presenters Resume
David Hammer, Vice President, McKesson Mr. Hammer
is a Vice President in McKessons Business
Performance Solutions group. He focuses on
revenue cycle, consumer-directed health care, and
pay for performance issues for hospitals, health
systems, and related entities. In his more than
23 years of industry experience, Mr. Hammer has
held a variety of positions with leading health
systems, Big-4 consulting firms, I. T. vendors,
and revenue cycle outsourcing companies. Backgroun
d and Affiliations Mr. Hammer received an MBA in
Management and an MHS in Health Care
Administration from the University of Florida in
1987. He also received a BBA in Accounting with
a minor in Information Systems (Magna cum Laude)
from the University of North Florida in 1985.
Mr. Hammer is certified by HFMA as a Fellow
(FHFMA) and as a Certified Healthcare Finance
Professional (CHFP). He has been named an HFMA
Distinguished Speaker for five consecutive years,
and has received HFMAs Gold, Silver and Bronze
service awards. Recent Publications Mr. Hammers
most recent publication is Dont Panic CFOs
React to the New Economic Reality, which
appeared in the March 2009 issue of HFMAs
healthcare financial management journal (hfm).
Mr. Hammer authored the February 2008 cover story
in hfm, entitled Beyond Bolt-Ons Breakthroughs
in Revenue Cycle Information Systems. He also
wrote the July 2007 cover story, called The Next
Generation of Revenue Cycle Management, as well
as the July 2005 hfm cover story, entitled
Performance is Reality Is Your Revenue Cycle
Holding Up? Another one of his articles,
UPMCs Metric-Driven Revenue Cycle, appeared in
the September 2007 issue of hfm, and Data and
Dollars How CDHC is Driving the Convergence of
Banking and Health Care was published in hfms
February 2007 issue. His article Black Space
Versus White Space The New Revenue Cycle
Battleground appeared in the January 2007 issue,
and Customer Service Adapts to CDHC appeared in
the September 2006 issue. He also publishes
regularly in McKesson Provider Technologies
Answers magazine. Contact Information Mr. Hammer
can be reached by telephone at (954) 648-4764
and/or by e-mail at david.hammer_at_mckesson.com.
151