Using Data to Guide School and District Change presented by Cheryl Dyer, Assistant Superintendent fo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

Using Data to Guide School and District Change presented by Cheryl Dyer, Assistant Superintendent fo

Description:

Using Data to Guide School and District Change presented by Cheryl Dyer, Assistant Superintendent fo – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: lisam163
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using Data to Guide School and District Change presented by Cheryl Dyer, Assistant Superintendent fo


1
Using Data to Guide School and District Change
presented by Cheryl Dyer, Assistant
Superintendent for Curriculum and
InstructionBridgewater-Raritan Regional School
District, NJ
www.LeaderEd.com
  • To hear this webinar you will need to choose your
    audio mode.
  • Go to the control panel in the upper right corner
    of your screen and click the button of how you
    will be listening. Your choices
  • Use telephone
  • Use mic speakers
  • If using mic speakers make sure your volume is
    turned up so you can hear
  • If using the telephone
  • Dial 213-286-1201
  • Access Code 181-694-285
  • Audio PIN unique PIN shown in audio control
    panel on screen
  • Technical difficulties? Contact Debra Light at
    (518) 723-2071.

All participants are on mute.
2
Webinar Guidelines
  • All participants are on mute during the entire
    webinar.
  • Presentation portion will be 45 minutes
  • Questions and Answers portion will be 15 minutes
  • To ask a question type it in the question control
    panel in the upper right corner of your screen.
  • Content questions will be answered in the order
    they were received at the end of the webinar
    presentation.
  • We will send you a follow up email with the
    PowerPoint presentation and helpful resources

3
Using Data to Implement Change
www.leadered.com
4
Cheryl Dyer
  • Assistant Superintendent
  • Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
  • ICLE Consultant

5
Webinar Objectives
  • Participants will
  • Examine macro level and micro level types of data
  • Understand the relationships among content, the
    nature and needs of the learner and the
    expectations of the community as they relate to
    program evaluations and change
  • Become familiar with resources available from
    ICLE to make data manageable

6
Focus Activity
  • Make a mental list of words and phrases that come
    to mind when you think of data.

7
Frequently Listed Words and Phrases
  • A sea of information
  • Formative assessments
  • Standardized test scores
  • Overwhelming
  • Time consuming to analyze
  • Mind boggling

8
Data Provides a Roadmap
  • Where are we as a district?
  • Where do we want to go?
  • How do we want to get there?
  • Managers keep the system in place and minimize
    risk, we need leadership for improvement!

9
Lead the way
The essential task of leadership in business, in
education, in family life, and in public life is
to inspire, to teach, to act with courage, to
live with honor and to show the way. Gerald
Ford Abraham Lincoln once said (paraphrased)
"Good leaders take people where they want to go
while great leaders take people where they ought
to go." 
10
Leading Change in High Schools
  • Information, ideas and best practices related to
    key principles of change
  • The most current research and models to craft
    school-wide solutions
  • Practical advice, insight, and effective tools to
    improve high schools

Preview this publication at http//store.leadered.
com/
11
Data Use Are you in Quadrant A, B, C or D?
12
Rigor/Relevance Framework
6
The administrators use the data to evaluate
programs and design adaptations that meet the
needs of the students and the expectations of the
community without sacrificing the integrity of
the discipline
The administration understands the data and can
explain it to others, but they havent been able
to drill down and develop programs to address
concerns
5
4
3
Application of low level analysis the
administrator uses the data to identify of groups
of students who are at-risk or in need of
something different
2
Putting data in the hands of the administrators
they have acquired it, its in a nice binder!
1
1
2
3
4
5
13
Rigor/Relevance Framework
The teachers use the data to design lessons to
address skill gaps and evaluate the effectiveness
of those lessons through formative assessments,
and differentiate to meet learner needs through
research-based interventions!
6
Teachers understand the data, but dont know how
to use it to design lessons or formative
assessments or develop interventions.
5
4
3
Application of low level analysis The teacher
can sort students into high and low groups of
achievement. At-risk students are identified.
2
Putting data in the hands of the teacher they
have acquired it, its in a nice binder!
1
1
2
3
4
5
14
Where are we?
  • Moving to Great
  • How do we define great?
  • Curriculum
  • Instruction
  • How far away is great?
  • What is the benchmark?
  • Where are we now?
  • How do we get there?
  • Put the right people on the bus in the right
    seats
  • Make sure the driver has GPS!

15
Big Picture Data
  • What do we believe?
  • Philosophy
  • How prepared are we?
  • Staff demographics
  • What is our community like?
  • Socioeconomic status

16
Philosophy 101
  • Understanding our beliefs
  • Basic premise What we believe about how children
    learn influences how we teach!
  • Think back to those child psychology classes and
    educational theory classes.
  • What have you internalized about educational
    philosophy?

17
Essentialists Believe
  • Skills must be taught first.
  • Basic skills and facts are necessary for future
    learning.
  • Teachers must provide students with foundational
    knowledge.
  • The main goal of education is develop the
    intellect.

18
Essentialists Believe
  • The pursuit of knowledge for its own sake is good
    in itself.
  • We need to get back to basics!
  • Students need rewards and punishments to learn.
  • Not everyone has the potential for academic
    success.

19
Constructivists Believe
  • The curriculum must be relevant to the lives of
    the learners.
  • Teaching must be based on the method of
    intelligence.
  • Learning activities must be designed based on the
    needs of the students.
  • The curriculum must be integrated in order for
    students to make sense of their learning.

20
Constructivists Believe
  • Students learn best through problem-solving and
    collaboration.
  • The goal of education is transfer.
  • Skills must be learned in context, not in
    isolation.
  • Education is a process of growth.
  • When learning activities are relevant, rewards
    and punishments are unnecessary.

21
The Curriculum Wars
The Content
Explicit Instruction
Discovery Learning
Can you be somewhere along the continuum?
22
Sitting in the Middle of the See Saw
  • Do some beliefs conflict with one another?
  • Students should not have a choice in their
    education. They are immature and unable to judge
    for themselves.
  • The school should be a great smorgasbord of
    intellectual, artistic, creative and athletic
    activities, from which each child could take
    whatever he wanted, and as much as he wanted, or
    as little.

23
Can we trust them to choose vegetables?
24
Less Big Picture Data
  • What programs do we have?
  • Curriculum
  • Is it aligned with the state?
  • Curriculum matrix
  • Is it rigorous and relevant?
  • Lesson Plan Analysis
  • What does our community expect?
  • Survey data

25
What is a Program Evaluation?
  • The First Step in the Curriculum Renewal Process
  • The basis and catalyst for curriculum renewal
  • A mechanism to critically review existing
    curriculum in a systematic and collaborative
    manner
  • A means of determining whether the existing
    curriculum is meeting the needs of the learner,
    the expectations of the community and is true to
    the discipline (curriculum paradigm)

26
How It Works
  • Five Year and Five Stage Process
  • Year One/Stage One Program Evaluation, Review
    and Research
  • Year Two/Stage Two Curriculum Development
  • Year Three/Stage Three Initial Implementation
  • Years Four and Five/Stages Four and Five Full
    Implementation, Monitoring and Assessment

27
The Cycle
28
Year One/Stage One
  • Process of comparing the actual program to the
    ideal program
  • Research, comparisons, surveys, analysis of
    student achievement
  • Preparation of the Program Evaluation Report
  • Overview, Description of Changes, Philosophy,
    Comparison Data, Perception of Program, Evidence
    of Effectiveness, Commendations, Recommendations,
    Timeline for Implementation of Recommendations

29
ICLE Resources for Year One
  • We Lead, We Teach, We Learn Surveys
  • Curriculum Matrix
  • National Essential Skills Study
  • White Papers on Researched Best Practices
  • Gold Seal Lessons

30
Its Time to Lead
Updated March 20, 2009 We Learn Student Survey
70,358 We Teach Instructional Staff Survey
6,554 We Lead Whole Staff Survey 12,430
www.successfulpractices.org
31
Year Two/Stage Two
  • Curriculum Development
  • Revisions
  • Might take place in years three and four
  • Summer Curriculum Writing
  • New Course Development
  • Two-year process
  • Summer Curriculum Writing
  • Textbook Adoption Recommendations
  • Budgeting and Purchasing

32
ICLE Resources for Year Two
  • Curriculum Matrix
  • National Essential Skills Study
  • White Papers on Researched Best Practices
  • Gold Seal Lessons
  • Successful Practices Network

33
Achieving AYP Using State-specific Curriculum
Matrix Data
  • Crosswalks state standards to state tests in
    English, math, and science and to the Essential
    Skills
  • High, medium, and low priorities assigned
  • Professional development activities and 150 Gold
    Seal Lessons

To learn more, order or view excerpt
http//store.leadered.com Curriculum Matrix series
34
Choosing Districts for Comparison
  • Criteria
  • Similar demographics
  • Socioeconomic status (DFG)
  • Diversity Limited English Proficient, Special
    Education, Racial and Ethnic groups
  • Similar configuration
  • K-12
  • Similar size
  • According to the NJ DOE large is a district
    with more than 3,500 total students

35
The Comparison Group
36
Is Our Current Model Working?
  • Achievement data from 2006 and 2007 NJ ASK for
    Language Arts Literacy reveals that it is not
    working!

37
Small Picture Data
  • How are the students doing?
  • Assessment data
  • How do they compare to others?
  • Assessment data
  • Are they making progress from year to year?
  • Assessment data

38
Student Data
of Total Students partially proficient by grade
level
39
Student Data
of Total Students partially proficient by grade
level
40
Student Data
of General Education students partially
proficient by grade level
41
Student Data
of SE Students partially proficient by grade
level
42
Reading Recovery Results
in Partially Proficient ranges from 17 to 50
for Discontinued students, of Partially
Proficient ranges from 43 to 100 for
Recommended Action
43
Analysis of Reading Recovery Results
  • Why arent all of the successful students
    successful on the NJ ASK two years later?
  • Lack of systematic Tier 2 and additional Tier 3
    intervention after 1st grade
  • What accounts for the high percentage of
    Partially Proficient scores among the
    Recommended Action group of students?
  • Students needs are addressed by MLS Assistants
  • Lack of clearly defined, evidence/research based
    Tier 2 and Tier 3 interventions for this group!

44
Overview of Grades 3-11 LAL Total Students
5th, 6th and 7th grade results show the effect of
the increased rigor of the revised tests in 2008.
45
Trend Data for 3rd Grade
Overall, students perform better than the state,
but worse than the DFG and worse than districts
in the comparison group.
46
Trend Data 3rd Grade
We have more students in advanced proficient than
in the state overall, but less than the DFG and
considerably less than in comparison districts.
47
Trend Data for 11th Grade
In 2006, the of partially proficient students
was almost identical to the DFG. In 2007 and
2008, the DFG out scored the district.
48
Year Three/Stage ThreeThe What are We Going to
Do About it? Stage
  • Initial Implementation
  • Curriculum is put into practice
  • Focus on Staff Development
  • Feedback from teachers, parents, and students
  • Mid-course adjustments are made if necessary
  • Revisions are made if needed

49
How is this information being used to meet
student needs?
  • Professional Development for special education
    and general education
  • Four rounds of grade level training combining
    special education and grade level teachers
  • Job embedded training through the literacy coach
    and supervisors
  • Training for pull-out replacement resource
    teachers in grades 5-12
  • Training for teachers of self-contained SE
    students in grades K-12

50
How is this information being used to meet
student needs?
  • Literacy Initiative at the HS
  • Required weekly writing
  • Required writing in all content areas
  • Formative Assessments
  • Six-week Summer Literacy Program
  • Use of NCLB funds for economically disadvantaged
    and LEP students

51
How is this information being used to meet
student needs?
  • Intervention Specialists
  • Supplemental resources for special education and
    general education
  • Fundations
  • Intervention Stations
  • Phonics
  • Words Their Way
  • Study Island
  • Versatiles

52
Years Four and Five
  • Full implementation
  • Student achievement data is gathered and analyzed
    as a function of the change
  • Strengths and weaknesses of the curriculum are
    determined

53
ICLE Resources for Years 3-5
  • Gold Seal Lessons
  • Successful Practices Network
  • Consultants for Staff Development
  • Resource Binders for Staff Development
  • Using Assessment for Instruction
  • Improving Performance for Special Education
    Students
  • How Brain Research Impacts Instruction

54
Do We Have Hidden Beliefs?
  • Do we really believe that students should be
    challenged to reach their full potential?
  • Then why is participation in Advanced Placement
    and honors kept low via complicated entrance
    criteria?
  • Do we really believe in a balanced curriculum?
  • Then why do parents still think we refuse to
    teach phonics and traditional math algorithms?

55
How Did We Get Here?
  • Too much emphasis on self-esteem
  • Not enough emphasis on self-control
  • Expectations that are too low
  • Over-scheduling of children
  • A culture of self-indulgence
  • No pain lots of expected gain
  • Sense of entitlement

56
The Bottom Line
  • Dont be afraid to ask the tough questions.
  • Admit when something isnt getting the results
    that you want.
  • Resist complacency!
  • Expect as much from others (including students)
    as you expect from yourself!

57
More Bottom Line
  • In order for people to buy in to change, they
    need to know
  • What needs to change?
  • Why does it need to change?
  • What skills do they need to effect change?
  • How will they supported?
  • What is the desired goal?
  • How will they know when the goal is reached?

58
And dont leave any child behind
  • In the words of John Dewey
  • What the best and wisest parent wants for his
    own child, that must the community want for all
    its children. Any other ideal for our schools is
    narrow and unlovely acted upon, it destroys our
    democracy. (1899)

59
Mark Your Calendar!
17th Annual Model Schools Conference June 28-
July 1, 2009 Atlanta
Visit www.LeaderEd.com for more information
60
  • 1587 Route 146
  • Rexford, New York 12148
  • 518-399-2776
  • 518-399-7607 (fax)
  • www.leadered.com

Cheryl Dyer Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School
District P.O. Box 6030 836 Newmans
Lane Bridgewater, NJ 08807 www.brrsd.k12.nj.us cdy
er_at_brrsd.k12.nj.us 908-685-2777 ext. 277
61
Questions and Answers
  • This is the end of the presentation portion.
  • Submit questions at this time and stay on to
    hear the answers.
  • If you are logging off, thank you for attending
    and we will email you with follow-up information.

For more information about the www.LeaderEd.com
62
Thank you for attending!We hope you found the
information valuable.
For future webinar dates and topics visit
www.LeaderEd.com
Please do not hesitate to contact us with any
questions or comments. We encourage and value
your feedback. (518) 399-2776
Info_at_LeaderEd.com
63
www.LeaderEd.com
ReFOCUS
RePOSITION
ReINVENT
  • Cheryl and our team of consultants are available
    to work
  • with your school or district.
  • Data Driven Decision Making
  • Response to Intervention (RTI)
  • Curriculum Design and Implementation
  • Literacy Across the Curriculum
  • Differentiated Instruction
  • Rigor, Relevance, and Relationships

For information, please contact Lindsay Kaufman
at (518) 723-2064 or Lindsay_at_LeaderEd.com. www.le
adered.com/consulting.html
64
Achieve Student Success with Less K-12 FALL
SYMPOSIUM OCTOBER 23 25, 2009 SAN DIEGO
www.LeaderEd.com
  • ReFocus RePosition
    ReInvent
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com