Air ViceMarshal Stu Butler - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Air ViceMarshal Stu Butler

Description:

'What, to Industry, would success look like in implementing 'McKane' ... Whither NEC? - Governance. Joint. Action. The NEC Challenge. A VERY Personal Perspective! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:112
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: palm86
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Air ViceMarshal Stu Butler


1
  • Air Vice-Marshal Stu Butler
  • Capability Manager (Information Superiority)

2
Scope
  • Last Years Exam Question
  • Is NEC Dead?
  • Through Life Capability Management
  • My Intent
  • This Years Exam Question
  • Challenges for Directors Equipment Capability
  • Challenges for Simulation and Training
  • Questions ?

3
Last Years Question
  • What, to Industry, would success look like in
    implementing McKane with reference to TLCM?

4
Feedback Enduring Messages
  • MoD needs to change rather than Industry
  • Both need to change?
  • Improved stability will be key
  • Openness and single set of data
  • TLCM forces changes to conduct of business
  • Nature and scale of change unclear
  • Consider across capability areas

5
Feedback Key Themes 1
  • Partnering between MoD - Industry
  • Views differ DIS v 2 will clarify
  • Aspirations must be realistic and benefit both
    sides
  • Organisation-centric thinking for TLCM delivery
  • Whats done is important, vice what we look like
  • CPG/CMG as the planning powerhouse
  • Closer Research and Development required
  • Better focused research goals?
  • Industry seek incentivisation and rewards
  • Stability a key driver
  • But how do we handle poor performance?

6
Feedback Key Themes 2
  • Small/Medium Enterprise engagement?
  • Not MoD business unless niche or capacity issue?
  • Drive SME knowledge in Business Cases
  • Common Models/Architecture/Tools/Standards
  • We want them too!
  • Programme Office project MIS and tools
  • Faster more agile procurement
  • Uncommitted headroom will help
  • MoD will always move the goalposts need to
    recognise the impact on both sides
  • Greater Transparency required
  • Under consideration needs to be realistic

7
Whither NEC? - Governance
Joint Command Group (E)
Chaired by VCDS
Senior Responsible Owner NEC CBM Lt Gen
Figgures, DCDS(EC)
NEC and CBM Executive Group
NEC Dimension Steering Groups 2 Programme
Directors
Networks
2 Programme Director AVM Butler, CM(IS)
Info
People
Joint Action
8
The NEC ChallengeA VERY Personal Perspective!!
Ops Team
Guidance User Focussed IC Strategic Estimate
Risk and Benefits Analysis PR Practicalities!
  • What does this look like ?
  • How much is enough ?
  • How do we know when we have got there ?
  • How do we measure how far away we are ?

JCB
Tech Team
(Described in User Speak)
Network Enabled Capability
Current Position
(Audit)
Prog Office
9
TLCM Progress
  • Planning Round 08 not ideal context . and
  • Savings Targets demanding.. yet
  • TLCM already proving beneficial
  • TLCM delivering Cross-DEC and DLOD coherence
  • TLCM being used throughout the ECC
  • CPG and CMG planning powerhouse
  • Stakeholders fully engaged
  • Much work to do
  • Management Plans and Strategies at Step 1
  • Industry feeds developing

9
10
Capability Planning - Sponsor
10
11
My Intent for NEC
  • User Focussed
  • Jargon Free
  • Clear Direction through
  • SRO
  • Dimension Steering Groups
  • Clear 2012 and 2017 Milestone Statements
  • Revised JSP 777
  • Purple Spotting
  • Test Industry Compliance even more?
  • Tech Team helping shape the standards
  • A coherent , deliverable and realistic NEC Vision

12
NEC Vision The Future
  • Coherent Capability Plan to Deliver
  • End-to-End Command Information System
  • One general purpose network based on IP
  • One Security Architecture
  • Single family of applications
  • One managed, globally accessible information
    domain
  • Move to one Joint Operations Picture (JOP)
  • Service Orientated Architecture
  • Open architecture, mandated standards
    (particularly at the Interfaces)
  • Joint and Coalition interoperability
  • Recognise and Celebrate Success

Design for Integration not Integration of
Designs
13
This Years Exam Questions
  • What do you believe are the essential activities
    to be undertaken in order for the MoD to deliver
    NEC over the short, medium and long term?
  • What do you understand by the term Open Systems
    Architecture and what standards do the MoD need
    to mandate in order to achieve it?
  • ONE side of A4 per Question
  • NO Annexes
  • 12 PointRichard.Lushington481

Richard.Lushington481_at_mod.uk
14
Challenge for Sim and Synth
  • New simulation systems, and legacy systems on
    update, should
  • Be progressively networked
  • Use open Industry standards and architectures
  • Have a mandated minimum level of interoperability
  • Make maximum use of common services
  • (e.g. computer generated forces, scenarios and
    geospatial data)
  • Be rapidly reconfigurable
  • Make maximum use of COTS technology

15
The Joint Collective Training Vision
  • Ends
  • A Joint Collective Training capability that
    optimises FEs for effects-based operations in a
    joint, multinational and inter-agency context
    thereby embracing the ethos of training as we
    fight.
  • Ways
  • ensuring that the operational environment during
    operational and tactical level training is
    sufficiently represented
  • exploiting aggressively developments in
    simulation technology and distributed training
    capability
  • delivering a cost effective, coherent and rapidly
    configurable capability.

16
Equipment Capability Organisation
Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff (Equipment
Capability)
17
Challenges for DsEC
  • Getting NEC Better defined
  • NEC Buy-in from the Front Line
  • Meeting Defence Industrial Strategy
  • C4 better for Long Term Partnering?
  • ISTAR more opportunistic?
  • Planning Round 08
  • Gripping Support Costs

18
C4ISTAR Sector Challenges?
  • Wide ranging sector
  • Few UK only issues
  • Wide Industry interest
  • Breadth of Capability Planning Group cover
  • Wide range of capability requirements
  • Very small to very large
  • Numerous procurement models
  • Fast moving
  • Not responsive to research and breakthroughs

19
C4ISTAR Sector - Issues and Thoughts
  • Greater financial flexibility will improve
    responsiveness
  • UORs a good model, but TL support adds risk
    and all off the shelf
  • How to show VFM without competition?
  • Openness key for both MOD and Industry
  • Changes to behaviour required on both sides
  • DES need to force the pace do they have the
    skills?

Benefit required on BOTH sides
20
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com