Ethics, Professional Ethics, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Ethics, Professional Ethics,

Description:

Note the authors on page seven announce, near the bottom, that they are adopting ... top of page 11, do utilitarianism and deontologism really 'suggest if clarity ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:115
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: steveas
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ethics, Professional Ethics,


1
Health Care EthicsChapter 1
  • Ethics, Professional Ethics,
  • Health Care Ethics

2
Ethical Theories
  • Skip survey of moral theories, pp 1-7.
  • Note the authors on page seven announce, near the
    bottom, that they are adopting a holistic
    approach that amounts to adding emotion and
    cultural sensitivity to the practical wisdom
    component of Virtue Ethics.
  • They call their ethical position the approach of
    practical wisdom.
  • Does this buffet, pick and choose approach seem
    legitimate for professional ethics? Is there a
    better alternative?

3
Key Issues (pp 8-16)
  • --you may skim over these issues what are the
    authors trying to do here?
  • The Dignity of Individuals sounds like what
    ethical theory?
  • The Role of Society (page 9) sounds like what
    ethical theory?

4
Key Issues (cont.)
  • At the top of page 11, do utilitarianism and
    deontologism really suggest if clarity is not
    possible, ethics is not possible?
  • Page 12, under Society and Moral and Legal Rights
  • The authors say
  • a right is a moral or legal claim that an
    individual may assert against someone else,
  • then mid page
  • Any such claim imposes an obligation on another
    person
  • Note that asserting a right or claim against
    another imposes an obligation only
  • if you are correct in thinking you have a claim
    or right,
  • if the person you make the claim against is
    sufficiently aware of your claim, and
  • if they have no other more important obligation
    or obligations that conflict and thereby nullify
    your claim or right.

5
Key Issues (cont.)
  • Note that asserting a right or claim against
    another imposes an obligation only
  • if you are correct in thinking you have a claim
    or right,
  • (you loaned me 5 and I agreed to pay it back
    today)
  • if the person you make the claim against is
    sufficiently aware of your claim,
  • (today has arrived and you remind me to pay up)
  • if they have no other more important obligation
    or obligations that conflict and thereby nullify
    your claim or right.
  • (no one has a much stronger claim on that 5, say)

6
Key Issues (cont.)
  • Page 14, mid page
  • But our very personhood does not belong to
    society, and it would be unjust for society to
    demand that we sacrifice our life or our sanity
    for the common good.
  • What ethical theory is this a response to?
  • Whats wrong with the response?

7
The Professions and Professional Ethics (pp 16-
end)
  • Under Models of Medicine, pp 22-24
  • Ethical Models
  • Engineering Model
  • Paternal or Priestly Model
  • Collegial Model
  • Contractual Model
  • Covenant Model

8
The Professions and Professional Ethics (pp 16-
end)
  • Ethical Models (compare pp 10-12 in
    Towsley-Cook)
  • Which of the 5 are imposable on the patient?
  • Which of the 5 require cooperation between doctor
    and patient?
  • What are likely impediments to cooperation?
  • Which of the 5 require a good impression on the
    patient by the doctor?

9
The Professions and Professional Ethics (pp 16-
end)
  • The Patients Role (p 25)
  • What duties does a patient have?
  • The book says patients role should be a more
    active one than a sick role that respects
    equality of persons.
  • Isnt the customer always right?
  • Isnt the patient paying the doctor?
  • Isnt the patient expected to be sick or
    out-of-sorts?
  • Doesnt it seem odd to impose duties on someone
    who comes to you for help?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com