Planned Revisions to 40 CFR Parts 72 and 75 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Planned Revisions to 40 CFR Parts 72 and 75

Description:

Revisions necessary to support or streamline reporting under ECMPS. Revisions to clarify, simplify, modify or correct ... Stack Tester Accreditation (AETB) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: matthe196
Learn more at: https://www.epa.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Planned Revisions to 40 CFR Parts 72 and 75


1
Planned Revisions to 40 CFR Parts 72 and 75
  • Matthew G. Boze
  • U.S. EPA
  • Clean Air Markets Division

2
Types of Revisions Proposed
  • Revisions necessary to support or streamline
    reporting under ECMPS
  • Revisions to clarify, simplify, modify or correct
    mistakes in existing requirements
  • Revisions to strengthen and clarify Hg monitoring
    provisions

3
Definitions 72.2
  • Adding Definitions for
  • Long-term cold storage
  • EPA Protocol Gas Verification Program
  • Air Emission Testing Body (AETB)
  • Qualified Individual
  • Revising Definitions for
  • Capacity Factor
  • EPA Protocol Gas
  • Excepted Monitoring Systems

4
General Provisions
  • Updating Incorporated References
  • Add Default Moisture Value for Natural Gas (14.0
    and 18.0)
  • Allowing use of F-23 default SO2 emission rate
    for low sulfur fuels without requiring SO2 CEMS.
  • Remove requirement for EPA to publish each
    Alternative Monitoring System (PEMS) approval in
    the Federal Register

5
Reference Methods
  • Adopt revised Part 60 Reference Methods with
    certain exceptions
  • No calibration gasses prepared by dilution in
    field using method 205 (must use EPA Protocol
    Gasses only)
  • No using multi-holed probes (without prior
    approval) in lieu of traversing stack
  • No using Dynamic Spiking in lieu of the
    interference and system bias checks of the
    method.
  • Allow use of EPA Method 29 as an alternative to
    the Ontario Hydro Method for Hg.

6
Stack Tester Accreditation (AETB)
  • Add requirements for individuals or companies
    performing stack testing to be certified as Air
    Emission Testing Bodies (AETB) in accordance with
    ASTM D7036-04
  • ASTM D7036-04 Standard Practice for Competence
    of Air Emission Testing Bodies is a consensus
    standard developed to ensure stack testing is
    conducted by qualified individuals
  • The following Part 75 test would be subject to
    this standard
  • RATAs
  • Appendix E LME NOs emission rate tests
  • Hg emission rate tests for Hg LME units

7
Missing Data Substitution
  • Make Stepwise approach the required approach
    rather than Block approach
  • Substitute Data for Controlled Units
  • Remove requirement to petition for controlled
    maximum value under 75.34(c)(3) Tier 3
  • Add Provision to allow MEC/MCR in lieu of MPC/MER
    whenever controls are documented to be operating
    properly Tier 4 and unmonitored bypass stack
    hours

8
(No Transcript)
9
Recordkeeping and Reporting
  • Revisions to general and specific monitoring plan
    recordkeeping requirements
  • Support transition to XML format
  • Adding WAF reporting requirements for Rectangular
    Ducts
  • Revisions to QA/QC recordkeeping requirements for
    transition to XML format
  • Revisions to Quarterly Reports requirements for
    transition to XML format

10
Other Reporting Issues
  • Provision to allow long term cold storage units
    to suspend quarterly reporting
  • New requirement to report the certification
    deadline date needed to know when to start
    counting allowances by 72.9
  • Relax initial monitoring plan submittal deadline
    from 45 days to 21 days prior to initial
    certification
  • Remove requirement for EPA Form 7610-14
  • Allow reporting of steam load in units of
    mmBtu/hr
  • Separate reporting requirements for MP, QA, and
    Emissions (New Reengineering Process)

11
NOx Mass and Heat Input
  • Limit Monitoring Plan to only one active NOx mass
    methodology at a time
  • Revise and Simplify the linearity and RATA QA
    requirements for ozone season only (OSO)
    reporters
  • Clarify that peaking status for OSO reporters is
    based on 3,672 hours and not 8,760
  • Require that either a CO2 or O2 monitoring system
    be identified and QAs whenever heat input is
    calculated from stack flow and diluent (CO2 or O2)

12
Appendix A
  • Allow CO2 spans less than 6.0 percent with
    technical justification provided in the
    monitoring plan
  • Require vendors of EPA Protocol Gas to
    participate in a Protocol Gas Audit Program
  • Clarify applicability of Linearity Exemption
  • Alternative stability specifications for
    performing cycle time tests for low span
    analyzers
  • Correct Part 60 cross references

13
Appendix B
  • Harmonize 5 year requirement for 3-load flow
    RATAs with other 5 year testing requirements
    (make 5 years 20 calendar quarters)
  • Simplify the requirement for determining RATA
    deadlines after completing a grace period RATA.
  • Clarify and extend provisions for range specific
    data validation wrt linearities and daily
    calibration error checks
  • Clarify requirements and limitations for data
    validation using off-line calibrations

14
Appendix D E
  • Update references
  • Relax qualification requirements for pipeline
    natural gas
  • Remove requirements for vendor to split and save
    oil samples
  • Specify substitute data requirement for when the
    Appendix E correlation curve expires (use maximum
    emission rate)

15
Appendix F
  • Add equations N-1 and N-2 to rule and modify NOx
    Mass equations to support reporting hourly data
    in lb/hr rather than lbs.
  • Limit use of diluent cap to NOx calculations only
    to simplify reporting
  • Specify substitution requirements for negative
    emission calculations for certain equations (HI,
    CO2)
  • Procedures for prorating F-factors
  • Add standard F-factors to rule for Petroleum Coke
    and Tire Derived Fuels

16
LME (SO2 NOx)
  • Default Emission Rates
  • Allow use of permit sulfur limits to calculate a
    lower SO2 default emission rate than is provided
    by rule
  • Clarify that Part 60 CEMS data may be used to
    establish a fuel and unit specific default NOx
    emission rate
  • Clarify
  • How to calculate hourly, quarterly, and
    cumulative NOx emission rates
  • That the LME provisions of 75.19 must be used
    for all parameters (SO2, NOx, CO2) if used for
    any one
  • Remove requirement for hardcopy LME
    certifications to CAMD

17
Hg
  • Add requirements to provide 21 day notice and
    provide testing results upon request for periodic
    Hg LME emission tests
  • These requirements are consistent with
    requirements for Hg emission tests used to
    certify and QA Hg CEMS
  • Add heat input monitoring provision
  • Inadvertently omitted from previous Hg monitoring
    rule
  • Correct error in requirements for weekly system
    integrity checks
  • Harmonize the linearity and system integrity
    specifications with alternate specifications
  • Other technical corrections and changes to
    reflect ECMPS
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com