4D modeling of canopy architecture for improved characterization of state and functionning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

4D modeling of canopy architecture for improved characterization of state and functionning

Description:

The description of vegetation architecture is one of the ... Better senescence including keeping senescent leaves. Variability between plants (size, position, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:445
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: bare154
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 4D modeling of canopy architecture for improved characterization of state and functionning


1
4D modeling of canopy architecture for improved
characterization of state and functionning
  • F. Baret
  • INRA-CSE Avignon

2
Introduction
  • The description of vegetation architecture is one
    of the main limiting factor in the estimation of
    canopy characteristics such as LAI
  • Importance of the temporal dimension that drives
    the generation of canopy architecture and that
    offers regularities to be exploited

Turbid medium
Geometric
Explicit
3
Requirements
  • Good dynamic description of canopy architecture
  • Low amount of parameters/variables (for better
    retrieval)
  • Fast computation of the radiative transfer

Objectives of the study
  • Illustrate how canopy structure evolution could
    be generated
  • Present the corresponding variables and
    parameters used
  • Describe how to compute the radiative transfer
  • Conclude on the work to achieve

4
The context of high spatial and temporal
resolution observations
  • High spatial resolution
  • Generally pure pixels
  • object observed could be identified in terms of
    species
  • High temporal resolution
  • Continuous monitoring to be exploited in the
    understanding of how the architecture builds up
    (or destroys down!)

Case illustrated here maize canopies with
relatively simple and well known architecture
5
Modeling maize canopies architecture
  • Work derived from previous studies M. Espana,
    B. Andrieu, M. Chelle, B. Koetz, N. Rochdi
  • Describing the time course of individual leaves
    and stems
  • Based on a series of experiments
  • Semi-mechanistic models
  • Reduced number of variables
  • Reasonable level of details in canopy
    architecture description

6
Level of canopy architecture details required for
reflectance simulation
T0
T1
T2
7
Leaf area time course
  • Time of leaf of order n
  • Apparition nDTc
  • Disparition nDTcDTs
  • Variables required
  • N_max
  • S_max
  • To
  • DTc
  • DTs

8
Other architecture characteristics
  • Canopy
  • Plant density
  • Distance between rows
  • Row azimuth
  • Plant
  • Leaf insertion height
  • Leaf shape/curvature
  • Leaf azimuth
  • Leaf zenith

Leaf insertion height
Leaf order
9
Properties of the 4D maize model
  • Limited number of variables/parameters
  • N_max
  • S_max
  • To
  • DTc
  • DTs
  • H_max
  • Density
  • Leaf inclination
  • Dynamics well described
  • Improvements
  • Leaf curvature (easy)
  • Better senescence including keeping senescent
    leaves
  • Variability between plants (size, position, )
  • Flowers/ears
  • Vertical gradients in chlorophyll

10
Regularities in Chlorophyll gradients
1999
2001
Distribution verticale du contenu en chlorophylle
mesurée à partir de linstrument SPAD502
11
From canopy architecture to reflectance
Parcinopy
Multispectral version now available (M. Chelle,
V. Rancier)
12
Decomposing radiative transfer
Terms required
n(level,way,direction,inter_sol,inter_veget)numbe
r of photons (radiance) level bbottom
ttop way - downward upward direction
qssun direction qvview directionhhemispheric
interaction order (inter_sol,
inter_veget) 0 no interaction 1 1
interaction only ?1 one or more interactions
tss a tsstoo.rso f rso de rdd c/(a.Rsb.Rs)
tsd b tdo g /(a.Rsb.Rs)
13
Vegetation contribution (rso)
rso f(rleaf,tleaf,P(LAI,ALA,S,D,?,?s?v))
Parameters 'P' are spectral invariants
14
Approach
Building a parametric model
LAI,ALA,S,D,? Distribution of input variables
Constructionof the 3D architecture
?s?vSun/view configuration
PARCINOPY
rl, tl leaf reflectance Transmittance
Canopyreflectance
rs Soil reflectance
RT components
Parametric model P(LAI,ALA,S,D,?,?s?v, rl, tl)
15
CONCLUSION
  • A more mechanistic/realistic approach is proposed
  • Based on a simple description of canopy
    architecture to use fewer variables
  • No need for continuous description (discrete is
    enough)
  • Needs sensitivity analysis to evaluate the
    influence of the variation of N_max, H_max,
  • Needs full (or at least parametric for the
    spectral aspect) parametric model to be
    implemented to compute the reflectance fields
  • Needs coupling to canopy functioning models

16
Coupling between structure and function models
Reflectance
LAI
4D Architecture Model
Initialization
Stress (H2O, N)
S T
Work in progress for exploitation within an
assimilation scheme,
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com