GATT WTO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

GATT WTO

Description:

The objective was to create a framework that would regulate ... exports wheat, durum, wheat flour and semolina by 21 percent and 36 percent respectively. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1009
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: karenk85
Category:
Tags: gatt | wto | semolina

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GATT WTO


1
GATT / WTO
2
GATT
  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was
    established in Geneva in 1947.
  • The objective was to create a framework that
    would regulate international trade and stimulate
    international commerce.

3
Objectives of GATT
  • The objectives of the 1947 Agreement were to
    establish an orderly and transparent framework
    within which barriers to trade could be gradually
    reduced, and international trade thereby
    expanded.

4
Objectives of GATT
  • The most important elements of the Agreement
    included those of
  • non-discrimination the Most Favored Nation
    (MFN) principle
  • reciprocity
  • transparency
  • tariff reduction.

5
Exception and Waivers
  • developing countries were given special status.
  • countries that offer each other more favorable
    treatment within a custom's union were allowed to
    waive full adherence to the MFN clause.
  • agricultural trade was given special treatment,
    especially with regard to non-tariff barriers.

6
The GATT Negotiating Rounds
7
Reasons For Exclusion of Agriculture from
Earlier Rounds of GATT
  • The general consensus of opinion was that
    agriculture was a unique sector of the economy,
    that, for reasons of national food security,
    could not be treated like other sectors.
  • With the expansion of the manufacturing economy,
    agriculture was in relative decline. Political
    and social pressures demanded, however, that the
    decline be halted or slowed down, and that
    agriculture be protected from the full rigors of
    the international market.

8
Special Treatment for Agricultural Trade
  • Quantitative import restrictions, banned for all
    other commodities, could be used in the case of
    agricultural commodities
  • The use of agricultural export subsidies was
    explicitly permitted
  • Other mechanisms for protecting agriculture, such
    as variable import levies and domestic subsidies,
    were not explicitly covered by the GATT, and
    provided additional loopholes for agricultural
    policy makers wishing to protect the agricultural
    sector.

9
The Latest GATT Round
  • Uruguay Round
  • Place Uruguay.
  • Date 1986-93
  • Doha Round just started in November 2001

10
Uruguay Round
  • The Uruguay round was launched at a meeting of
    trade ministers in Punte del Este, Uruguay, in
    October 1986.
  • It was expected to last for four to five years
    and instead took around eight years (until
    December 1993).
  • What made the Uruguay round so contentious?

11
Reasons for inclusion of agriculture within the
GATT framework
  • comparative advantage
  • world market instability
  • The effects of protectionism

12
Agriculture in the Uruguay round negotiations
  • The objectives with regard to agriculture were
    described as follows To achieve greater
    liberalization of trade in agriculture and bring
    all measures affecting import access and export
    competition under strengthened and more
    operationally effective GATT rules and disciplines

13
The Main Players in the Agricultural Negotiations
  • The USA was enthusiastic about promoting greater
    liberalization in agricultural trade, and was
    keen to reduce the protection and support enjoyed
    by producers in the EC under the CAP.
  • The EC was much less amenable to far reaching
  • liberalization, but was keen to reach a workable
    compromise, that could be enshrined in the GATT,
    in order to minimize future trade friction
    between itself and the USA.
  • The Cairns Group

14
Other Players in the Agricultural Negotiations
  • For the large group of developing countries
    which were net importers of food, the main
    concern was over the impact of the Round on the
    cost of food imports.
  • Two other countries with a major interest in the
    outcome of the round were Japan and the Republic
    of Korea. These countries had highly protected
    domestic rice markets, and a strong domestic
    opposition to reform of the sector.

15
Initial Positions of US in the Uruguay Round
  • USA opened the negotiation with an unrealistic
    demand for the zero-zero option.
  • All agricultural subsidies and all quantitative
    restrictions on agricultural imports be phased
    out over a period of ten years, and that world
    health and safety measures be harmonized.
  • This proposal found support among Cairn groups
    but the EC totally opposed it.

16
Positions of Other Players
  • The EC's demands focused primarily on the concept
    of "rebalancing.
  • Japan, like the EC was keen to protect its
    farmers from international competition.
  • The demands of developing countries were focused
    on their need for special and differential
    treatment within the negotiations.

17
Slow Initial Progress in the Negotiations
  • At the mid-term review in Montreal at the end of
    1988, the negotiating parties in the agricultural
    group were as far apart as ever.
  • In April 1989, U.S. negotiators dropped their
    demand for zero-zero option.
  • In 1991, finally arrived at a consensus, whereby
    countries agreed to make concessions in each of
    the following three areas
  • import access
  • domestic support
  • export subsidies.

18
Dunkel Draft Act
  • At the end of 1991, the director-general of the
    GATT presented a comprehensive Draft Final Act,
    known as the Dunkel Draft.
  • It included the first complete text on
    agriculture, in which quantitative proposals were
    presented with respect to concessions in each of
    the three major disciplines

19
The Blair House Accord
  • the 24 percent cut in the volume of subsidized
    exports that was originally proposed, was reduced
    to 21 percent.
  • direct payments made under production limiting
    programs, such as those made under the EC's CAP
    reform, and the USA's policy of deficiency
    payments and land set-aside, were made exempt
    from domestic support reduction commitments
  • commitments to reduce domestic support on a
    product by product basis were replaced by a
    commitment to reduce overall support to the
    agricultural sector.

20
Major Areas of GATT Disciplines
Market Access
Domestic Support
Export Subsidies
21
Market Access Commitments
  • Tariffication, Tariff Binding and Reduction.
  • Non Tariff Barriers to be converted to Tariff
    Equivalent.
  • All Tariffs to be bound.
  • Reduce existing and new tariffs by 36 percent, on
    a simple average basis, in equal installments in
    six years.
  • Reduce tariffs for each commodity by a minimum of
    15 percent .

22
Market Access (cont.)
  • Minimum and Current Access Commitment
  • Minimum access import opportunities to be
    provided for products with import below 5 percent
    of domestic consumption
  • Increase minimum access quotas from 3 percent of
    domestic consumption to 5 percent over the
    implementation period.

23
Japanese Minimum Access Commitment for Rice
24
Domestic Support Commitments
Amber Box Policies
Blue Box Policies
Green Box Policies
Largest effect on production and trade
Least effect on production and trade
Compromise between these two
25
AMS Support Level for 24 Countries (1986-88 vs
1995)
26
Export Subsidies Commitment
  • Under GATT agreement, both United States and the
    European Union agreed to reduce the quantity and
    budgetary outlay ceilings for subsidized exports
    wheat, durum, wheat flour and semolina by 21
    percent and 36 percent respectively.
  • The final year (2000) commitments are the
    required 21 and 36 below the 1986-90 base for
    the quantitative and budgetary commitments,
    respectively

27
U.S. GATT Commitments on Subsidized Exports
28
EU GATT Commitments for Subsidized Exports
  • The European Union will reduce the quantity and
    budgetary outlay for export subsidies from the
    current level. In the year 2000, the EU's maximum
    allowable quantity of subsidized wheat and wheat
    flour exports will be 13.4 MMT, 6.8 MMT less than
    the quantity of subsidized exports in 1991-92.

29
Uruguay round GATT Negotiations vs Old GATT
  • The old GATT was often criticized because it
    lacked an enforcement mechanism
  • One of the most sustentative achievement of the
    Uruguay round was the creation of a new
    international institutions, the WTO.
  • The WTO is responsible for enforcing existing
    international trade agreements and serve as a
    host for new talks to liberalize trade.

30
The WTO
  • As of 1999, 135 countries had become members of
    WTO. Another 30 countries are in the process of
    applying for membership.
  • As of 1999, the WTO dispute settlement system had
    been remarkably active and successful.
  • Between 1995 to 2000, more than 190 cases has
    been notified to the dispute settlement process

31
The Conduct of U.S. Commercial Policy
  • Since 1934, Congress has authorized systematic
    reduction in trade barriers. On the other hand,
    Congress has provided American business with
    alternative mechanisms for seeking and obtaining
    relief from foreign competition.
  • In this section, we will discuss some of these
    measures.

32
Dumping
  • It is defined as selling a product in a foreign
    country at a price that is lower than the price
    charged by the same firm in the home country.

33
Economic Impacts of Dumping
PW
P1
P2
Predatory dumping
34
Antidumping Law
  • Current antidumping law provides that under
    certain conditions, a special tariff be imposed
    on foreign goods if it is found to be sold less
    than fair value.

35
Antidumping Cases Initiated Worldwide, 1999
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com