Hvorfor er brugbarhedsafprvninger usability tests ikke tilstrkkeligt til at sikre reel brugerinddrag - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Hvorfor er brugbarhedsafprvninger usability tests ikke tilstrkkeligt til at sikre reel brugerinddrag

Description:

... tests) ikke tilstr kkeligt til at sikre reel brugerinddragelse? ... Hvorfor opn s reel brugerinddragelse ikke ved brugbarhedsafpr vning (usability tests) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: itu75
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hvorfor er brugbarhedsafprvninger usability tests ikke tilstrkkeligt til at sikre reel brugerinddrag


1
Hvorfor er brugbarhedsafprøvninger (usability
tests) ikke tilstrækkeligt til at sikre reel
brugerinddragelse?
  • Gæsteforelæsning
  • ph.d.-stipendiat
  • Datalogi, RUC

2
Participatory Design (PD)
med udgangspunkt i to tekster af Lucy Suchman
Suchman, L. A. (1995). "Making Work
Visible." Communications of the ACM 38(9) 56-64.
Suchman, L. A. (2002). "Located Accountabilities
in Technology Production." Scandinavian Journal
of Information Systems 14(2) 91-105. Special
issue on Ethnography and Intervention
3
Lucy A. Suchman Ph.D. i antropologi fra
Berkeley, 1984. Udgav i 1987 bogen Plans and
situated actions The problem of humanmachine
communication, som er et epoke-gørende studie
af brugen af kopimaskiner og udviklingen
AI-hjælpesystemer 1979 2000 Forsker hos Xerox
PARC, hvorfra hun bl. a. blev med-stifter af CPSR
og PDC. 2000 Professor i antropologiske
studier af videnskab og teknologi (STS)
Sociologi, Lancaster England http//www.comp.lan
cs.ac.uk/sociology/staff/suchman/suchman.htm
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
"Recognizing the assignment of technology users
to the position of other within systems design
makes available critical resources from recent
anthropology and feminist research. An effort to
reflect on these relations where we are system
designers and the others system users is
presented." Suchman, 1995, p. 61 note 9
"But as Hales points out, the technological
usefulness of artifacts created in this way
remains unknown, or known only indirectly, and
relies upon extensive forms of articulation work
that remain invisible to professional design
Users 'construct' technology they do this
both symbolically, in their 'reading' of
artefacts, and literally, in the articulation
work that is essential before a concrete
configuration of artefacts (as distinct from the
generic system-products that emerge from
usability labs in Silicon Valley) can serve as
an adequate day-by-day supporting structure for
a live practice. Hales 1994, p. 162 Suchman
2002, p. 94, original emphasis
7
Hvorfor opnås reel brugerinddragelse ikke ved
brugbarhedsafprøvning(usability tests)?
  • Fordi den form for afprøvning for ofte er et
    kvalitetstjek på 'færdige' produkter, som ved f.
    eks. tænke-højt forsøg.
  • En designerkontrolleret repræsentation af
    virkeligheden formuleret i et sprog som afspejler
    designernes forståelse af verden fremfor
    brugernes.
  • Det fører til 1) eller 2) af nedenstående tre
    perspektiver på design-praksis1) Objektivt
    design (design from nowhere)2) Intimitet på
    afstand (detached intimacy)3) Lokaliseret
    ansvarlighed (located accountability)

8
Objektivt design (design from nowhere)
  • Politiske og økonomiske strukturer, hvor anonyme
    og ulokaliserbare designere, som producerer
    teknologiske objekter til dekontekstualiserede
    brugere. Deres professionalisme gør en dyd ud af
    at fjerne sig fra brugspraksis og dermed også
    ansvaret for konsekvenserne. Kritik af skarp
    design/brug adskillelse, som en foregår i design
    uden PD.

9
Intimitet på afstand (detached intimacy)
  • Kritik af PD og usability studier for deres
    selv-centrerede måde at behandle repræsentationer
  • " Wagner (1994) identifies three processes that
    underwrite the combined detachment (from other
    sites) and intimacy (within their own) of
    scientific and technical communities.
    Organizational egocentrism refers to a kind of
    'autopoesis' of such communities, through which
    they "select those aspects of reality that can
    be grasped by existing cognitive structures and
    create their own artificial worlds in which
    their potential can unfold" (p.260).

10
Lokaliseret ansvarlighed (located accountability)
  • Vores viden er bestemt af perspektiv og
    stedbundethed. Dette giver en særlig
    ansvarlighed, selvom (og netop fordi) det er et
    delvist og personligt perspektiv.
  • " The only possible route to objectivity on
    this view is through collective knowledge of the
    specific locations of our respective visions. By
    extension, the only possibility for the creation
    of effective objects is through collective
    knowledge of the particular and multiple
    locations of their production and use."

11
Working relations of technology production and use
  • Fornyet opmærksomhed på arbejdsrelationer kunne
    forandre design praksis
  • 1. Recognizing the various forms of visible and
    invisible work that make up the production/use
    of technical systems, locating ourselves within
    that extended web of connections, and taking
    responsibility for our participation
  • 2. Understanding technology use as the
    recontextualization of technologies designed at
    greater or lesser distances in some local site
    of practice
  • 3. Acknowledging and accepting the limited power
    of any actors or artifacts to control technology
    production/use
  • 4. Establishing new bases for technology
    integration, not in universal languages, but in
    partial translations
  • 5. Valuing heterogeneity in technical systems,
    achieved through practices of artful
    integration, over homogeneity and domination."
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com