Title: Hvorfor er brugbarhedsafprvninger usability tests ikke tilstrkkeligt til at sikre reel brugerinddrag
1Hvorfor er brugbarhedsafprøvninger (usability
tests) ikke tilstrækkeligt til at sikre reel
brugerinddragelse?
- Gæsteforelæsning
- ph.d.-stipendiat
- Datalogi, RUC
2Participatory Design (PD)
med udgangspunkt i to tekster af Lucy Suchman
Suchman, L. A. (1995). "Making Work
Visible." Communications of the ACM 38(9) 56-64.
Suchman, L. A. (2002). "Located Accountabilities
in Technology Production." Scandinavian Journal
of Information Systems 14(2) 91-105. Special
issue on Ethnography and Intervention
3Lucy A. Suchman Ph.D. i antropologi fra
Berkeley, 1984. Udgav i 1987 bogen Plans and
situated actions The problem of humanmachine
communication, som er et epoke-gørende studie
af brugen af kopimaskiner og udviklingen
AI-hjælpesystemer 1979 2000 Forsker hos Xerox
PARC, hvorfra hun bl. a. blev med-stifter af CPSR
og PDC. 2000 Professor i antropologiske
studier af videnskab og teknologi (STS)
Sociologi, Lancaster England http//www.comp.lan
cs.ac.uk/sociology/staff/suchman/suchman.htm
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6"Recognizing the assignment of technology users
to the position of other within systems design
makes available critical resources from recent
anthropology and feminist research. An effort to
reflect on these relations where we are system
designers and the others system users is
presented." Suchman, 1995, p. 61 note 9
"But as Hales points out, the technological
usefulness of artifacts created in this way
remains unknown, or known only indirectly, and
relies upon extensive forms of articulation work
that remain invisible to professional design
Users 'construct' technology they do this
both symbolically, in their 'reading' of
artefacts, and literally, in the articulation
work that is essential before a concrete
configuration of artefacts (as distinct from the
generic system-products that emerge from
usability labs in Silicon Valley) can serve as
an adequate day-by-day supporting structure for
a live practice. Hales 1994, p. 162 Suchman
2002, p. 94, original emphasis
7Hvorfor opnås reel brugerinddragelse ikke ved
brugbarhedsafprøvning(usability tests)?
- Fordi den form for afprøvning for ofte er et
kvalitetstjek på 'færdige' produkter, som ved f.
eks. tænke-højt forsøg. - En designerkontrolleret repræsentation af
virkeligheden formuleret i et sprog som afspejler
designernes forståelse af verden fremfor
brugernes. - Det fører til 1) eller 2) af nedenstående tre
perspektiver på design-praksis1) Objektivt
design (design from nowhere)2) Intimitet på
afstand (detached intimacy)3) Lokaliseret
ansvarlighed (located accountability)
8Objektivt design (design from nowhere)
- Politiske og økonomiske strukturer, hvor anonyme
og ulokaliserbare designere, som producerer
teknologiske objekter til dekontekstualiserede
brugere. Deres professionalisme gør en dyd ud af
at fjerne sig fra brugspraksis og dermed også
ansvaret for konsekvenserne. Kritik af skarp
design/brug adskillelse, som en foregår i design
uden PD.
9Intimitet på afstand (detached intimacy)
- Kritik af PD og usability studier for deres
selv-centrerede måde at behandle repræsentationer
på - " Wagner (1994) identifies three processes that
underwrite the combined detachment (from other
sites) and intimacy (within their own) of
scientific and technical communities.
Organizational egocentrism refers to a kind of
'autopoesis' of such communities, through which
they "select those aspects of reality that can
be grasped by existing cognitive structures and
create their own artificial worlds in which
their potential can unfold" (p.260).
10Lokaliseret ansvarlighed (located accountability)
- Vores viden er bestemt af perspektiv og
stedbundethed. Dette giver en særlig
ansvarlighed, selvom (og netop fordi) det er et
delvist og personligt perspektiv. - " The only possible route to objectivity on
this view is through collective knowledge of the
specific locations of our respective visions. By
extension, the only possibility for the creation
of effective objects is through collective
knowledge of the particular and multiple
locations of their production and use."
11Working relations of technology production and use
- Fornyet opmærksomhed på arbejdsrelationer kunne
forandre design praksis - 1. Recognizing the various forms of visible and
invisible work that make up the production/use
of technical systems, locating ourselves within
that extended web of connections, and taking
responsibility for our participation - 2. Understanding technology use as the
recontextualization of technologies designed at
greater or lesser distances in some local site
of practice - 3. Acknowledging and accepting the limited power
of any actors or artifacts to control technology
production/use - 4. Establishing new bases for technology
integration, not in universal languages, but in
partial translations - 5. Valuing heterogeneity in technical systems,
achieved through practices of artful
integration, over homogeneity and domination."