Immunization Safety System Registry Linkages: Lessons Learned from the Smallpox Vaccination Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Immunization Safety System Registry Linkages: Lessons Learned from the Smallpox Vaccination Program

Description:

John Iskander, David Walker, Roseanne English-Bullard, Susanne Pickering, John ... Williams, Robert T. Chen, David King, Vicki Kipreos, Carol Knowles, Susan Reef ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: jxi0
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Immunization Safety System Registry Linkages: Lessons Learned from the Smallpox Vaccination Program


1
Immunization Safety System- Registry Linkages
Lessons Learned from the Smallpox Vaccination
Program
  • John Iskander, David Walker, Roseanne
    English-Bullard, Susanne Pickering, John
    Copeland, Warren Williams, Robert T. Chen, David
    King, Vicki Kipreos, Carol Knowles, Susan Reef

2
Presentation Outline
  • Registry-safety monitoring linkage the smallpox
    vaccination experience
  • The Data Mart approach
  • Routine integration of registry activities with
    vaccine safety systems review of benefits and
    status of current activities

3
Background
  • Smallpox Vaccine (Dryvax) re-licensed in October
    2002
  • United States Smallpox Vaccination Program
    announced in December 2002
  • State/local health departments commenced
    vaccinating response teams on 1/24/03
  • Because of rare but potentially serious adverse
    effects, extensive screening and safety
    monitoring established

4
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
  • U.S. spontaneous reporting system for vaccine
    safety In existence since 1990 jointly operated
    by FDA and CDC
  • The primary objectives of VAERS applicable to
    smallpox vaccine safety surveillance are to
  • 1) Detect new, unusual, or rare vaccine adverse
    events (AE)
  • 2) Monitor for increases in known AE
  • 3) Determine risk factors for particular types
    of adverse events
  • Subject to important limitations common to other
    passive surveillance systems
  • Underreporting/biased reporting
  • Inclusion of adverse events (AE) not known to be
    causally related to immunization

5
(No Transcript)
6
Adverse Event Reports After Infant ( lt 1 y.o.)
Vaccination,by Vaccine Combinations Received,
VAERS 1989-2000
7
US Smallpox Vaccine Adverse Events
Surveillance system overview
8
Pre-Event Vaccination System (PVS)
  • PVS served as a registry for civilians who
    received smallpox vaccine
  • The Pre-Event Vaccination Number (PVN) served as
    the unique identifier for each vaccination that
    was administered as well as the subsequent take
    reading and active surveillance report
  • Data was entered into either directly into PVS at
    the state/local level via secure web portal or
    indirectly into a state supported system

9
Electronic Reporting to VAERS Encouraged
  • Advantages
  • Permits entry of patient vaccination number (PVN)
    for comparison with denominator data
  • Electronic submissions available as data within
    as little as 24 hours paper reports 1-2 weeks
  • Security of data transmission (128 bit
    encryption, SSL technology)

10
Enhancements to VAERS for Smallpox AE Reporting
  • Both numerator (VAERS) and denominator (PVS) data
    updated regularly
  • VAERS data integrated with other safety databases
    to provide safety surveillance summaries weekly
    disseminated via MMWR and CDC website
  • Aggregate data reports and lists of serious and
    non-serious reports received by VAERS provided to
    state/local health departments weekly via CDC
    Secure Data Network (SDN)

11
Summary Data, VAERS and PVS 1/24 10/9/03
  • 38,655 persons vaccinated (through 10/3)
  • 814 civilian VAERS reports
  • 88 non-serious by regulatory criteria (no
    reported hospitalization, death, life threatening
    illness, or disabilty)
  • Event reporting rate 21.1/1,000 vaccinees
  • gt99 report only smallpox vaccine
  • 76 female
  • 61 from persons aged 40-59 years

12
VAERS Evaluation Data, 1/24-10/09
  • Proportion of reports
  • Submitted electronically 66.0
  • Containing accurate registry number (PVN)
    64.3 (after active follow-up)
  • Containing unverifiable PVN 4.3

13
Active Surveillance
  • As of 6/11/03
  • 10,835 records 28 days or more post vaccination
    44 of total in PVS
  • Specific conditions identified
  • Adverse events 3.7 39 local reactions
  • Medical treatment required 2.0
  • Contraindications to vaccination
  • Vaccinees 0.2, contacts 0.3
  • Cardiac risk factors 0.8-9.6

14
Lessons Learned
  • Need for stronger linkages between VAERS, PVS,
    and active surveillance
  • Barriers to more complete PVN reporting to VAERS
    included
  • Regulatory
  • IT/technical
  • State specific issues related to adverse event
    reporting policies and procedures

15
Smallpox Data Mart (SDM)
  • Copies data from disparate sources to a common
    repository
  • PVS
  • Active Surveillance
  • VAERS
  • Smallpox Weekly Progress Report (SWPR)
  • Performs transformations of raw transactional
    data to provide data that is more
    analysis-ready

16
SDM Data Transformation
  • Transactional data not analysis-ready
  • Duplicate records
  • Multiple vaccines for single person
  • Information contained in multiple tables
  • SDM cleans and transforms data as it is extracted
    from sources
  • Transformations can be tailored for
    frequently-requested analyses
  • Facilitates consistency among different analysts

17
SDM Source DataAnd Key Data Linking Fields
PVS
AS
VAERS
SWPR
PVN Grantee
PVN Grantee
PVN Grantee
Grantee
Smallpox Data Mart
18
Registries and Their Role in Vaccine Safety
19
  • Immunization Registries (IR) Vaccine Safety
    Recommendations
  • National Vaccine Advisory Committee,
  • Subcommittee on Coverage, 2/97
  • IR should be developed with the capability of ..
    monitoring vaccine safety.
  • Consumer Reports 8/01
  • Policy-makers should continue - and adequately
    finance - improvements in tracking and analyzing
    (potential) vaccine injuries. This includes
    expanding state IRwhich are invaluable for
    researching vaccine safety...

20
  • Immunization Registries and Vaccine Safety
    Potential Benefits
  • Improve reporting to VAERS
  • Decrease under-reporting
  • Increase timeliness
  • Increase accuracy
  • denominators gt rates gt better (only?) source
    of potential safety signals
  • Potential linkage to other population-based
    registry and datasets
  • Better care for minority with serious AEs
  • Alerts to potential contraindications
  • Advise/enroll in studies on managing AE

21
VAERS Reporting PathwaysFuture Direction
VAERS
Parent
Paper or Phone
Web (stand alone)
Health Care Provider
Registry
22
Vaccine Safety and Registry Community Working
Group(VASREC)
  • Purpose To serve as a forum for consensus
    development, problem solving, and feedback on
    issues, topics, concerns relating to closer
    integration of vaccine safety information into
    immunization registries. Specifically,
    electronic reporting to VAERS that originates
    from registries.

23
Products
  • The group will strive to produce documents that
    describe a consensus perspective on the specific
    issue being addressed. Many of the issues will
    be functional descriptions and descriptions of
    options.

24
Leadership of the VASREC Group
  • Chair Warren Williams, MPH
  • Meeting time 3rd Friday of the Month
  • Email wxw4_at_cdc.gov
  • Virtual meetings via phone call, email
  • CDC/AIRA (American Immunization Registry
    Association) representation by both registry and
    vaccine safety program staff
  • All interested parties welcome to participate on
    an ongoing basis
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com