The 2020 school education summit: The public good and the education of children State Library of New - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

The 2020 school education summit: The public good and the education of children State Library of New

Description:

The 2020 school education summit: The public good and the education of children ... times redolent of star-chamber administrative treatment with leaders chosen on ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:130
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: shar279
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The 2020 school education summit: The public good and the education of children State Library of New


1
The 2020 school education summit The public good
and the education of children State Library of
New South Wales, Saturday June 28th, 2008
  • What should be essential in the role, character
    and provision of public education? What role
    should private schooling play and what
    arrangements might support this role?

Mike Furtado, Co-Director, Boyce Furtado
Education Consultants, QLD.
2
Overview and Introduction What is negotiable
and not negotiable in public education
inclusivity?
  • Inclusion equal opportunity, belonging,
    identity, diversity
  • About welfarism, redistribution (RED) and a
    return to statist education?
  • About a moral-underclass discourse (MUD),
    anti-nuisance education or critical engagement
    with the dominant culture?
  • About a social integration discourse (SID) or
    separatism? (Levitas 2005)
  • Public education as a poststatist new times
    inclusive discourse

3
What is negotiable and not negotiable in public
education free?
  • Free available and accessible to all- fiscal
    restraint?
  • Free available to public-private partners-
    accountability?
  • Free available to low and high SES- equity?
  • Free available to diverse public providers, e.g.
    state schools and faith schools that are open to
    all?

4
What is negotiable and not negotiable in public
education secular?
  • Secularism as a liberal-democratic non-sectarian
    pluralist discourse and not as an anti-clerical
    Nietscheian discourse
  • Religious education and schooling as a liberal
    modernist democratic post-Vatican II discourse,
    and not as an anti-democratic, clericalist,
    fundamentalist discourse
  • Whats negotiable and non-negotiable in the
    present Post-Septembrist 11/2001 global context
    and whats realistic?
  • More especially, politics being the art of the
    possible, whats possible?

5
What is negotiable and not negotiable in public
education comprehensive?
  • Comprehension or selection Newsom (1963) and
    Plowden (1967) Reports?
  • Comprehension and attacks from the Right (the
    History Wars, Critical Literacy and grammar,
    pedagogy and social reproduction)
  • Comprehension and private education are they
    generically incompatible?
  • Comprehension and Catholic education why they
    are inseparable
  • Comprehension and inclusivity as a discourse that
    potentially unites public and Catholic education
    and some others?

6
What should be essential in the role,
accountability, operation and obligation of
publicly-funded private providers (1)?
  • Problems of publicly-funded private provision?
    Whats essential and what isnt?
  • Essential equity, anti-discrimination and
    transparency of professional conduct through the
    separation of powers, access to administrative
    justice and effective community participation
    through processes of governance. (The governance
    of private education is often clerical or
    corporate managerial and only selectively
    anti-discriminatory and publicly accountable).
  • Varying mechanisms and structures result in
    varying standards, practices and mechanisms,
    sometimes streamlined but at other times redolent
    of star-chamber administrative treatment with
    leaders chosen on grounds other than merit, e.g.
    religious grounds.
  • Effective governance requires greater
    accountability, the publication of reports, and
    transparency of administrative practice, external
    audits, accountability to Ombudsmen, and
    commitment to equal opportunity and social
    inclusion.

7
What should be essential in the role,
accountability, operation and obligation of
publicly-funded private providers (2)?
  • Advantages of integration
  • Integrated schools have brought a large measure
    of subsidiarity to school administration, e.g. in
    New Zealand all schools are Ministry schools
    rather than Departmental schools, demonstrating
    high levels of autonomy at local and internal
    levels, resulting in heightened teacher autonomy,
    accountability and standards.
  • Integrating schools has stymied trends towards
    the external imposition of standards in education
    through the appointment of an external
    inspectorate as in the UK and instead generated
    increased professional exchange and
    collaboration.
  • Integration has resulted in the demise of the
    state aid issue and a proper focus on the
    relative advantages and disadvantages of public
    and private schooling.
  • Independent schools in integrated polities do not
    get public funding.

8
What should be essential in the role,
accountability, operation and obligation of
publicly-funded private providers (3)?
  • Further Advantages of Integration
  • Integrated schools only independent focus is on
    effective religious education otherwise they are
    completely equal, accountable and comparable.
  • Integrated students pay low-figure dues on
    capital investment and therefore do not pay fees.
    Otherwise they enjoy equal access.
  • Integrated schools must enrol all students who
    seek their ethos.
  • There is no difference between the general
    aggregated SES profile of public and integrated
    school students.
  • In particular instances where these exist funding
    is amended to reflect levels of need.

9
Is it possible or desirable to create better
alignment between public and private providers of
school education?
  • Desirable?
  • Yes especially through integration
  • Otherwise stick with the status quo
  • Possible?
  • Yes through consultation
  • Through individual school agreements
  • Eliminating the no-disadvantage clause
  • Recognising that the systems differentiate
    between allocative and redistributive formulae
  • Ensuring that all funding (Commonwealth and State
    as well as for all programs) is rationalised

10
Conclusion and Summation
  • Public education must be inclusive, fully
    publicly-funded, secular in terms of pluralism,
    non-sectarian, and comprehensive
  • All private schools should be invited to
    contribute to the draft of a conditional private
    schools integration act New Zealand provides a
    successful evidence-based precedent for this
  • Education should be defined as a global merit
    good, emphasising the collective purposes or
    common goods of education
  • This can be done by identifying the socially,
    culturally and economically inclusive purposes of
    schooling, and how all schools might best assist
    in achieving those purposes through accessing
    public funding
  • This would inject a welcome but not exaggerated
    diversity into Australian schooling as well as
    contribute to the development of a regulatory
    regime to ensure that these purposes are
    implemented and met
  • I have no doubt that all Catholic schools and
    several others would join.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com