Vascular Access Considerations and Options for Pediatric CRRT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Vascular Access Considerations and Options for Pediatric CRRT

Description:

Minimum 30 to 50 ml/min to minimize access and filter clotting ... Quinton 8 Fr; n = 20; 120 Treatments) Venous Access for CRRT: Special Situation/LVAD-ECMO ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:261
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Stuar121
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vascular Access Considerations and Options for Pediatric CRRT


1
Vascular Access Considerations and Options for
Pediatric CRRT
  • Stuart L. Goldstein, MD

2
Vascular Access Overview
  • Required performance characteristics
  • Size and site options
  • Pros and cons of femoral vs IJ
  • Recirculation issues
  • Special situations
  • LVAD/ECMO
  • Citrate anticoagulation

3
Pediatric CRRT Vascular AccessPerformance
Blood Flow
  • Minimum 30 to 50 ml/min to minimize access and
    filter clotting
  • Maximum rate of 400 ml/min/1.73m2 or
  • 10-12 ml/kg/min in neonates and infants
  • 4-6 ml/kg/min in children
  • 2-4 ml/kg/min in adolescents

4
Venous Access for CRRT
  • Match catheter size to patient size and
    anatomical site
  • One dual- or triple-lumen or two single lumen
    uncuffed catheters
  • Sites
  • femoral
  • internal jugular
  • avoid sub-clavian vein if possible

5
(No Transcript)
6
Vascular Access for Pediatric CRRT Pros and Cons
of Femoral Site
PROS
CONS
  • Relatively larger vessel may allow for
  • larger catheter
  • higher flows
  • Ease of placement
  • No risk of pneumothorax
  • Preserve potential future vessels for chronic HD
  • Shorter femoral catheters with increased
    recirculation
  • Poor performance in patients with
    ascites/increased abdominal pressure
  • Trauma to venous anastamosis site for future
    transplant

7
Vascular Access for Pediatric CRRT Pros and Cons
of IJ/SCV Site
PROS
CONS
  • Tip placement in right atrium decreases
    recirculation
  • Not affected by ascites
  • Preserve potential vein needed for transplant
  • SCV stenosis (SCV)
  • Superior vena cava syndrome
  • Risk of pneumothorax in patients with high PEEP
  • Trauma to veins needed potentially for future HD
    access

8
Femoral versus IJ catheter performance
  • 26 femoral
  • 19 gt 20 cm
  • 7 lt 20cm
  • 13 IJ
  • Qb 250 ml/min (ultrasound dilution)
  • Recirculation measurement by ultrasound dilution
    method

Little et al AJKD 361135-9, 2000
9
Femoral versus IJ catheter performance
plt0.001 plt0.007
Little et al AJKD 361135-9, 2000
10
Femoral versus IJ catheter performance
Pediatrics
P value NS NS NS NS
(Gardner et al, CRRT 1997Quinton 8 Fr n 20
120 Treatments)
11
Venous Access for CRRTSpecial
Situation/LVAD-ECMO
  • Parallel to other extra-corporeal circuit
  • ECMO
  • LVAD
  • Blood prime
  • High ECMO/LVAD flows can cause minimal negative
    arterial pressure
  • access disconnect alarms
  • arterial screw clamp to cause negative pressure

12
CRRT in LVAD circuit
CRRT
LVAD
13
Vascular Access for Pediatric CRRTSome Final
Thoughts
  • Catheters with poor function will function
    poorly over and over and over and over
  • Balance between surgical/ICU expertise
    (preference?) and the necessary evils dictated by
    the patient
  • high PEEP femoral catheter?
  • massive ascites IJ catheter?
  • available sites are there any?
  • Which vessel are you willing to traumatize?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com