Title: Improving the YY ratio and other signals with the dHLT
1Improving the Y/Y ratio (and other
signals)with the dHLT
- Bruce Becker
- Research Centre
2Outline
- Mostly said already...
- Some interesting physics signals
- What can the dHLT bring to the game ?
- Work in progress
- outlook
3Physics introduction
- Quarkonium suppression well-established signal of
QGP. - Although suppression could be from other effects
- Normal nuclear suppression
- wrong description of initial state (CGC) etc
- Use ratio eliminates nuclear effects
- BUT
- Have to study many signals simulatneously
- pT dependace of ratios of resonances
- Centrality / ET / Temp dependance of resonance
production - etc...
4Why Upsilon family ratio?
- Large production cross section at LHC
- Clear suppression patterns for different QPG's
- Studies show that it's possible to make a
measurement within 1 month of running. (Eric,
Rachid Philippe) - Even pT integrated yield gives a nontrivial
measurement. - Fairly detailed study already done (Erics
talk some extensions possible) - DAY (YEAR) ONE OBSERVABLE !
5Reminder...
- Vogt Gunion (and refs therein)
- Predict suppression patterns dependant on nature
of plasma
6What can we measure in one (ALICE heavy ion
running) year ?
- Most important results of previous work (Eric
Philippe) - Given nominal
- Reaction rate
- Cross sec.
- Bkgnd level
- Feed-down contr
- Centr bins
- Can estimate
- PT spectra
- PT integrated yield
7ASSUMING L0 TRIGGERING WE CAN DISCRIMINATE
QGP/NON-QGPBut what about the dHLT ?Can we
determine the nature of the plasma ?
8What can the HLT bring to the game (I)
Reminder.
- Mandate of the dHLT is to
- Retrieve more signal (at high pT)
- Reduce background (at low pT)
- This may translate into
- Smaller errorbars
- More measurements as function of pT
- But this has to be MEASURED !
9What can the dHLT bring to the game (II)
- This requires an extended study
- real efficiency of detector (updated eff.)
- Full understanding of limitations of dHLT
- Limitations of algorithm
- Fundamental limitations from hardware
- Limitations due to current algorithm
- Both under investigation (Szostak, Becker)
- Requires offline and online implementation
10Improved trigger efficiency (I)
- The dHLT has higher efficiency than L0
To be updated !
11Improved trigger efficiency (II)
- Nothing existed in AliRoot yet to measure dHLT
performance - Nothing to link particles, hits to other data
containers (digits, clusters, etc) - dHLT needs input from digits (not hits) in order
to be realistic - Links added to AliRoot by Artur to overcome
problem - Next step dHLT into offline code
- Allow realistic efficiency determination
- See effect on various simulated signals
12Improved signal to background ratio
Tracker rejects unvalidated tracks
13Other signals of interest
- Not only interested in signals that vary with PT
but also - With centrality, T/Tc (Model dependant ! )
- Partial suppression case to be studied as
function of centrality - Remains to be seen exactly what dHLT brings to
that measurement
14Work in progress
- Full simulation necessary
- To check dHLT efficiency
- And biasies (with multiplicity, PT)
- Map out the efficiency of the trigger in an
interesting space - Eff(pT (GeV),b(fm))
- Perhaps increase the
number of cent classes
higher statistics ?
eff
b
PT
b
15Compare dHLT triggered set with L0 triggered set
- Once simulations are complete, can compare the
ratio of yields from dHLT and L0 to find out - How much you gain in total yield and sig/bkgnd
- Where in phase space you gain the most
- Realistically offline simulations to be
compared with results of dHLT prototype - (long term goal)
16outlook
- Full study of effect of dHLT on interesting
signals underway - Part of larger work, integrates with other work
at UCT - dHLT prototype building/testing
- Offline code development and integration
- AliEn setup at UCT (use PDC04 data for
simulations - Physics analysis
- Results in next 3-5 months
- Will be interesting to see what dHLT can REALLY
bring to the game !