Regulating Commerce and Speech in Cyberspace - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Regulating Commerce and Speech in Cyberspace

Description:

Camp and Chien (2000) identify 4 types of media: Publisher: newspaper, ... Prurient interest. Reasonable person. Community standards. Distribution or retrieval? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:776
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: burley
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regulating Commerce and Speech in Cyberspace


1
Regulating Commerce and Speech in Cyberspace
2
Internet regulation
  • Can the net be regulated?
  • Should the net be regulated?
  • What is cyberspace?
  • What is regulation?

3
Internet medium or place?
  • Choice influences approach to policies
  • Goodwin net is a medium
  • Telephone one-to-one
  • TV one-to-many
  • Net many-to-many
  • Camp and Chien (2000) identify 4 types of media
  • Publisher newspaper, magazine
  • Broadcast TV, radio
  • Distributor
  • Common carrier telephone, cable companies
  • Their conclusion spatial model more appropriate

4
Figure 9-1 The Ontology of Cyberspace
Cyberspace
Public Space (or Place) Broadcast Medium
(bookstore model) (common carrier model)
5
Regulate what?
  • Content FDA monitors food and medicine
  • Processes Health department ensures adherence to
    standards
  • Physical space regulated both ways

6
Figure 9-2 Two Modes of Cyberspace Regulation
Cyberspace
Regulating Content Regulating Process
Speech
Commerce
7
The Lessig Model
  • Cyberspace inherently decentralized
  • Larry Lessig the codes the thing
  • Four modalities laws, norms, market,
    architecture (physical constraints)
  • For cyberspace, replace architecture with code
    (digital constraints)
  • NET 95 libertarian architecture freedom and
    anonymity
  • Intranet architecture code is the law

8
Privatization of information policy
  • New level of enforceability in cyberspace
  • Prevention of behaviors via code
  • Loss of autonomy?
  • Coded restrictions negate public debate
  • 1998 Internet becomes giant mall
  • Congress passed DMCA, SBCTEA, NET Act
  • Domain name control given to ICANN
  • RIAA sought ban on MP3 players
  • AOL Time Warner merger

9
Domain names
  • gTLDs generic top-level domains
  • .com, .net, .org, .gov, .edu
  • Prior to 1998 NSF
  • First come, first served
  • Cybersquatting
  • 1999 Anticybersquatiing Consumer Protection Act
  • 1998 ICANN

10
Metatags
  • Keyword metatags
  • Used by search engines
  • Description metatags
  • Appear on search result
  • Potential for abuse

11
Deep linking
  • Should link levels be controlled?
  • Ads and hit counters usually on top level
  • Can controls be enforced?

12
Spam
  • Unsolicited, promotional, sent in bulk
  • Virtually unlimited (no postage)
  • Cost shifted to ISPs and recipients
  • Bandwidth and disk space wasted
  • Violates individual autonomy
  • Everyone a spammer?
  • Filters or laws?
  • Success stories

13
Censorship
  • First Amendment
  • Right to free speech is conditional
  • Regulation by social norms and market forces
  • Censorship by suppression
  • Censorship by deterrence

14
Cyberporn
  • Pornography and gambling most profitable
  • Miller v. California (1973) obscenity guideline
  • Prurient interest
  • Reasonable person
  • Community standards
  • Distribution or retrieval?

15
Internet pornography laws
  • Communications Decency Act (1996)
  • Struck down in 96/97
  • CPPA portion survived (for a while)
  • Child On-Line Pornography Act (1998)
  • Killed in 1999
  • RIP CPPA
  • Died 4-16-2002
  • Included virtual images

16
Table 9-1 Internet-specific Child Pornography
Laws
17
Cyberspeech
  • U.S. has emphasized pornography, Europe more
    concerned about speech
  • Germany Information and Communications Act
    (1997)
  • German law holds ISPs accountable
  • Biased towards violence
  • Bomb-building directions
  • Different rules for real space and cyberspace?

18
Filtration
  • Screens too much
  • Screens too little
  • ClearPlay
  • PICS self censorship
  • Reflect biases of content-labelers
  • Potential for abuse
  • Downstream vs. upstream filtering

19
Defamation
  • Libel (written) and slander (oral)
  • Flames and netiquette
  • Publisher liability repeater is as liable as
    originator
  • Role of ISPs

20
Liability vs. Accountability for ISPs
  • Morally accountable despite not being liable?
  • Spinello ISP is accountable if
  • ISP had capability to do something, and
  • Failed to act after being informed
  • Spinello ISP must
  • Remove defamatory remarks
  • Issue a retraction
  • Try to censure the originator
  • Realistic expectation?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com