Title: Friedel Weinert: Philosophy of the Social Sciences Year II: Semester II SS2000M
1Friedel Weinert Philosophy of the Social
SciencesYear II Semester IISS-2000M
- Three Models, Continued
- The Critical Model
- Lecture VII
2Critical Model
- Critical Model A Synthesis between Empirical and
Interpretative Models - Social science cannot treat society as an
undetached object of research combine methods of
explanation and understanding - Scientific rationality is not the paradigm of
rationality in society it is only means-end or
instrumental rationality - empirical model preoccupied with instrumental
rationality - social sciences should preserve the Enlightenment
sense of rationality - the interpretative model, based on a model of
anthropological understanding, is unable to
capture the complexity of modern societies - Critical theory includes A) criticism of
scientific rationality and B) reflection on
methodology in Social Sciences.
3Critical Model Horkheimer
As understood and practised in our civilization,
progressive rationalization tends to obliterate
that very substance of reason in the name of
which this progress is espoused.
The concept of rationality, underlying modern
industrial societies has destroyed the very aim -
the emancipation of man - from which it started
out.
- Origin of scientific rationality
- Enlightenment
- Secularisation and Globalisation
4Critical Model Theory and Praxis
- A) Theory and Praxis Critique of Instrumental
Reason - Horkheimer identifies the present crisis of
reason as its formalisation - formalisation of reason ? reduction of reason to
a mere instrument - as opposed to
- objective reason ? rational considerations of the
ends (purpose) - Implications of the formalisation of reason
- reflection becomes immaterial to determination of
desirability of any goal in itself (e.g.
technology) - ultimate decisions - acceptability of ideals,
criteria for our actions and beliefs, ethical and
political principles - are made dependent on
factors other than reason (decisionism) - identification of knowledge with science is
mistaken, because technological progress ? human
progress
5Critical Model Theory and Practice
- Implications for the social sciences?
- Distinguish critical and conservative functions
of the social sciences
- Critical Functions
- objective analysis of the state of society
- interest in evolution of society
- interest in rationality of ends justice,
emancipation - study of pathologies of societal rationalisation
- empirical methods
- engagement with use of empirical findings
- tension between ideal and reality
- Conservative Functions
- objective analysis of the state of society
- social engineering (Popper)
- organisation of society remains unquestioned
- empirical methods
- neutrality towards use of empirical findings
6Critical Model Theory and Practice
- Critical Functions
- Some empirical studies mass media, mass culture
- protest movements legitimacy crises in modern
societies - Violation of postulate of value neutrality
- Conservative Functions
- separation of values internal to research from
values external to research - objectivity
- piecemeal reform of institutions
- Critical Functions
- incorporation of internal and external values
into social science research - critique of modern rationalistic society
- reform of society
7Critical Model Poppers Criticism
- Poppers Criticism of Critical Function
- the problem of unplanned planning
- interference with a social process may change
direction of this process - self-fulfilling and self-negating prophecies
- unplanned planning arises for two reasons
- uncertainty of human agency
- uncertainty of predictions because of complicated
interactions between observer and observed - modification of Critical Theory as result of
criticism - interest in emancipation ? global reform of
society - Enlightenment as illumination
8Critical Model Explanation and Understanding
- Habermas
- Sociological Enlightenment
- technological (scientific) rationality leads to
technological society - structural barriers distort rational dialogue and
communication - model of communicative rationality (rather than
instrumental rationality) - seek universal conditions of communicative
action, discourse, rationality - B) Explanation and Understanding
- Aim of social sciences according to Weber
- study of social reality in cultural context and
explanation of social behaviour with the help of
hypothetical regularities (e.g. rationality
motives like achieving a purpose through the best
possible means) - study of social action as meaningful behaviour,
subject to empirical tests
9Critical Model Ideal Types
- historical explanation of the emergence of social
patterns, e.g. modern societies - use of ideal types (Verstehen)
- Ideal Types
- theoretical constructions (capitalism,
feudalism) (limit concepts or models) - systematic characterisation of societal patterns
- essential for working out cultural meaning of
social interactions - comparison of model behaviour (complete
rationality) and actual behaviour - subject to empirical testing